Friday, 29 November 2019

American Mary (3 Stars)


This is my 20th and probably my last horror film in November 2019. It will probably be a while before I watch another horror film. I have nothing against horror films, if they're well made, but I'm not a horror film fan. I think you know what I mean.

When I watched "American Mary" six years ago I didn't expect to watch it again. I even offered to give away my DVD, but nobody wanted it. Something about it has haunted me ever since. While watching it I felt violated, but I couldn't get the imagery out of my mind.

Before carrying on, read what I wrote about it six years ago. That review contains a plot summary, which I won't repeat here.

I still have problems with the film, but I've raised the rating to three stars. It's not an awful film, far from it. It's very artistic, even if I find many of the images distasteful. It features a strong woman, and I always like films about strong women. There have been other rape'n'revenge films, but there's never been a film in which the revenge goes so far. Mary is strong. Mary is beautiful. Mary is deranged. Everyone in the club where she works is scared of her. When she walks into the bathroom the other women flee. Even the club owner, Billy, is terrified of her, but he can't resist her. He fantasises about her killing him. Didn't Valerie Solanas say that all men have a death fetish? What she meant was that the sexual act involves the woman devouring the man's body, swallowing it up, but some men have a more explicit death fetish.

The film demythologises the surgeon profession. What I mean is, there are certain careers that are held in high esteem, or at least they used to be. Maybe their glamour has been eroded in the last 50 years. The highest career that people look up to is airline pilot, followed by doctors and teachers. It used to be that a character recommendation from any of these people would be accepted as support for a job application.

The film shatters the myth that surgeons are something special. At work they save lives, but after work they're abusive perverts and sexual sadists.


The writers and directors of the film are the Twisted Twins, Jen and Sylvia Soska. They play twins in the film. They don't want to be separated, even if one of them dies before the other, so they pay for Mary's unique services. They each have their left arm amputated and attached to one another. That's real sisterly love.

The problems that I have with the film are my own sensibilities. I don't like films which feature medical operations. They're too realistic. I'd rather see a head being chopped off and flying through the room. I don't like body modifications, and I don't even like piercings. "American Mary" combines all the things that I find repulsive. That makes it a good horror film.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Marvel Years 10.10 - October 1970


In 1970 Marvel wanted to try something new. Instead of writing about its own characters, they wanted to attempt to write about a character that belonged to someone else. This led to lengthy negotiations to acquire the rights to publish stories about Conan the Barbarian. He was a character who had first appeared in pulp novels in the 1930's, and after the early death of his creator Robert Howard the rights had been acquired by Glenn Lord, a literary agent who was passionate about Robert Howard's writing.

Eventually Marvel agreed to pay Glenn Lord $200 for every issue it published. This was a huge sum for a small company like Marvel, making it a risky venture. The first issues were written by Roy Thomas and drawn by Barry Smith, and the sales were so low that the comic was in danger of being cancelled, but within two years it became one of Marvel's best selling comics. The series continued until 1993, when Marvel lost the rights to the series. Roy Thomas wrote the first 115 issues, and it was considered by many to be his signature comic.

As an external character licensed for Marvel's use, I don't consider Conan's comics to be canon. (That sounds like a word play, but it's not intentional). That doesn't mean that I don't enjoy the comics. It just means that I shan't review them in my future posts.


Another new comic that appeared in October 1970 was Spoof. It was a second attempt at a satirical comic after the cancellation of Not Brand Echh. It contained three short stories each month in which the writers made fun of Marvel's other comics. For instance, the first issue begins with a seven page story written by Roy Thomas and drawn by Marie Severin, which is a parody of Marvel's recent horror anthology stories. Then follow a seven page story written and drawn by Stu Schwartzberg, and a six page story written by Len Wein and drawn by Marie Severin. I don't find the comic particularly funny, and it was never popular with the readers. It was cancelled after five issues.




Amazing Spider-Man #89

Title: Doc Ock Lives!

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Gil Kane

Villain: Doctor Octopus

Regulars: J. Jonah Jameson, Joe Robertson, Randy Robertson


After the explosion at the end of last issue, Spider-Man assumes that Doctor Octopus is dead. Strange as it seems, he even feels touches of grief for his deadliest foe. Then Spider-Man reads in a newspaper that his body wasn't found in the plane wreckage, so he has to search for Doctor Octopus again.

In a rooftop battle Doctor Octopus overpowers Spider-Man and throws him off the roof, barely conscious.




Sub-Mariner #30

Title: Calling Captain Marvel!

Writer: Roy Thomas
Artist: Sal Buscema

Villain: Mr. Markham (gangster)

Guests: Captain Marvel, Rick Jones


Rick Jones sees Sub-Mariner on the beach. He's acting strangely, so he becomes Captain Marvel to challenge him. After a fight Sub-Mariner breaks down into a nervous wreck, so Captain Marvel becomes Rick Jones again to comfort him.

Sub-Mariner reports that a concussion grenade used against him has temporarily made him afraid of the sea. It was used against him by a gangster called Markham, who has threatened to turn the sea radioactive with a Molecular Polluter (TM) if he isn't paid 100 billion dollars. Oh wait! I'm getting him confused with Dr. Evil. The exact sum isn't named.

Together Sub-Mariner and Captain Marvel easily overwhelm Markham, and they throw the device into space, where it explodes harmlessly.

This story is out of sync with the current Fantastic Four comics. It probably takes place before Fantastic Four #102.




Fantastic Four #103

Look! This is the first time the Thing has ever yelled his battle cry on the cover of a comic: It's clobbering time!

Title: At war with Atlantis!

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: John Romita

Fantastic Four: Reed Richards, Susan Richards, Ben Grimm, Johnny Storm

Villains: Magneto, Sub-Mariner

Regulars: Crystal, Franklin Richards, Agatha Harkness

Guests: Dorma


War between Atlantis and the surface world, in particular the USA, is imminent, but Reed Richards advises caution. He suspects that it might be a misunderstanding, and he's right. Magneto is tricking Sub-Mariner into starting a war.


Look who's talking to the Fantastic Four. It's Tricky Dicky himself!

Reed Richards flies to Sub-Mariner's ship with Ben Grimm and Johnny Storm to talk to him. Susan Richards delivers Franklin to Agatha Harkness. Magneto fires one of Sub-Mariner's missiles at the approaching Fantasti-Car. Sub-Mariner blocks the missile, not wanting to strike first, and falls into the sea. Magneto uses the opportunity to take control of the ship.

Magneto sees Susan Richards returning and takes her prisoner. He also captures Lady Dorma. Sub-Mariner realises that he and the Fantastic Four have a mutual enemy.




Thor #181

Title: One God must fall!

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Neal Adams

Villain: Loki, Mephisto

Regulars: Odin, Balder, Sif, Fandral, Hogun, Volstagg, Heimdall


The Warriors Three fight against Mephisto while Sif frees Thor, who is still in Loki's body. Mephisto can't stand to be in the presence of Thor's goodness, so he sends all of them back to the Rainbow Bridge.

On Earth, Loki (in Thor's body) is threatening the United Nations. Thor (in Loki's body) fights him, even though he's much weaker. When Loki throws the hammer, Thor prevents him from retrieving it. After 60 seconds Thor's body disappears and is replaced by Donald Blake's body. Thor's essence enters the body, forcing Loki back into his own body.




Captain America #130

Title: Up against the wall!

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Gene Colan

Villain: The Hood, Batroc, Porcupine, Whirlwind

Guests: Hulk (in film), Peter Parker (cameo)


This simple little story is one of the best Captain America comics so far.

Captain America is still travelling on his motor-bike as Steve Rogers. He comes across a police roadblock, so he suits up to investigate. He finds a riot on a university campus. The students are insisting on speaking to the dean, who's locked himself in his room. Captain America rescues the dean, but he's sympathetic with the students.

Captain America is invited to speak on television about the riot. The invitation is a plot by a criminal called the Hood – nice name! – who wants to turn older people against the youth. He's shocked when Captain America gives a very balanced speech, expressing good feelings towards both sides.

The show is interrupted by a newly formed group, the Brigade of Batroc, which is made up of Batroc the Leaper, Whirlwind and the Porcupine. They are working for the Hood.

Did you figure out what the Hulk is doing in this story? Steve Rogers was watching a film in a movie theatre. I wonder when this fight took place.




The Incredible Hulk #132

Title: In the hands of Hydra!

Writer: Roy Thomas
Artist: Herb Trimpe

Villain: Hydra

Regulars: General Ross, Major Talbot, Betty Ross, Jim Wilson


After being bombarded with the Gammatron rays a second time the Hulk no longer reverts to Bruce Banner, not even while he's asleep. He's held unconscious by a sedative while General Ross decides what to do with him.

On the way home from the army base, Jim Wilson is abducted by Hydra. They tell him that the Hulk is their friend, and they want to release him. He returns to the base the next day and says he wants to spend some time with the Hulk. He opens an air vent, through which Hydra lowers a rigging to pull the Hulk up to their hovercraft. They want to use him as their slave to create chaos on Earth while they quietly take over, but the Hulk fights with them and destroys their craft.

Back on the ground, the Hulk finds Jim badly wounded and swears revenge.




Iron Man #30

In the 1970's Marie Severin and Bill Everett frequently created the covers for comics drawn by other artists. She drew the artwork, he inked it. They signed their covers e7v. I'll let you work out why. Sometimes this signature was hidden in the artwork. On the cover above you can find their signature in the balcony of the Japanese house.

Title: The Menace of the Monster-Master!

Writer: Allyn Brodsky
Artist: Don Heck

Villain: Monster-Master


This story is an homage to the Japanese monster films that had been popular ever since the first Godzilla film was made in 1954. It's written by Allyn Brodsky, who has already written a few stories in Marvel's horror anthology comics, but this is only his second super-hero story after the Hercules one-shot in Ka-Zar #1.

Iron Man travels to Japan to help scientists with a research project. They're attacked by a giant winged creature that they call Zoga the Demon. It's actually a flying robot piloted by someone who calls himself the Monster-Master. At the end he's unmasked. He's Toru, one of the scientists, who wants to rule Japan and purge the country of foreign invaders.




The Avengers #81

Title: When dies a legend!

Writer: Roy Thomas
Artist: John Buscema

Avengers: Captain America, Thor, Iron Man, Black Panther, Goliath, Vision, Quicksilver, Scarlet Witch

Villain: Cornelius Van Lunt, Jason Birch


That's strange. In the last issue it seemed to be an amiable decision that a few Avengers should aid Red Wolf against Cornelius Van Lunt while the others looked for Scorpio. Now the remaining Avengers are criticising them for not following the majority decision and talking about the Avengers breaking up.

After this discussion, the story follows Goliath, Vision, Scarlet Witch and Red Wolf. They're shot out of the sky by a flying vessel belonging to Van Lunt that's piloted by robots. This is the first time that we've seen he has high tech capabilities. Vision and Scarlet Witch are separated from the others. Van Lunt's men take Scarlet Witch prisoner, and Vision is forced to act as Van Lunt's personal bodyguard to save her life.

Goliath and Red Wolf attack Van Lunt's headquarters with an army of Indians. While Goliath fights with Vision, Red Wolf and the Indians destroy the dam that has been keeping the water out of their native lands.

Cornelius Van Lunt and Red Wolf seemingly die in the falling rubble of the dam, but the story ends with William Talltrees (Red Wolf's alter ego) returning to his tribe.




Daredevil #69

Title: A life on the line

Writer: Roy Thomas
Artist: Gene Colan

Villain: Thunderbolts (black gang)

Guests: Black Panther


Daredevil and Black Panther both arrive to foil a robbery, acting on different tip offs. They decide to unite to put the Thunderbolts gang out of business. They claim to be fighting for black rights, but in truth they're just stealing money for their own profit.

Billie Carver is an ex-soldier who has recently returned from Vietnam to pursue a civilian life. His 15-year-old brother Lonnie, a student in Black Panther's school where he teaches as Luke Charles, is associated with the Thunderbolts. Lonnie is one of the boys that Black Panther wants to save, as he's recounted in the last two issues of The Avengers.




Astonishing Tales #2


Title: Frenzy on the Fortieth Floor!

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Jack Kirby

Villain: Kraven the Hunter

I'm not sure what Jack Kirby is up to in this issue. Look at Ka-Zar on the splash page. His body is stiff and his face is featureless. The drawings on the second page are just as bad. The art improves from the third page onwards, but I still have to ask what's wrong with Jack. Was he deliberately sabotaging the comics in his last few weeks before leaving Marvel? This is a sad way for him to leave the company that he made great. Apart from a few issues of Inhumans stories, which he probably drew months in advance for Amazing Adventures, this is his last artwork that will be published for Marvel.

Ka-Zar arrives at the Arlington Arms Hotel in New York and demands to see Kraven. The hotel staff refuse, saying that he's given instructions not to be disturbed, but Kraven comes down to the lobby to attack Ka-Zar. He fights his way up to the fortieth floor, where Zabu is being kept prisoner. Ka-Zar defeats Kraven, while Zabu is rescued by someone calling himself the Petrified Man.




Title: Revolution!

Writer: Roy Thomas
Artist: Wally Wood

Villain: Prince Rudolfo, Doomsman, Faceless One

Prince Rudolfo, who was captured last issue, is revealed to be a robot, built by Doctor Doom himself but reprogrammed by the real Rudolfo.

Someone called the Faceless One allies himself with Rudolfo to make a new attack on Latveria. They recruit the Doomsman as an ally. An attack on the city is carried out, more successful than the previous one. The story ends with Doctor Doom standing face-to-face with his enemies in the palace dungeon.



Other comics published this month:

Conan the Barbarian #1 (Roy Thomas, Barry Smith)
Millie the Model #186 (Stan Lee, Stan Goldberg)
Chili #17 (Stan Lee, Stan Goldberg)
Our Love Story #7 (Stan Lee, John Buscema)
Rawhide Kid #80 (Larry Lieber, Larry Lieber)
Western Gunfighters #2 (Gary Friedrich, Dick Ayers)
Chamber of Darkness #7 (Bernie Wrightson, Bernie Wrightson)

Note the appearance of Bernie Wrightson as writer and artist in the lead story of Chamber of Darkness. This was the beginning of his career as a freelance writer/artist for Marvel and DC simultaneously. As he continued he wrote hardly any stories, preferring to work as an artist. Over the next 20 years he worked for Marvel, DC and other companies, but his most famous work appeared in DC Comics.

Thursday, 28 November 2019

Guilty of Romance (5 Stars)


This is a film with a subject matter that would totally disgust me if it were made by any other director. The scenes of depravity and violence against women make me feel sick in my stomach, but Sion Sono's unique portrayal of madness lifts the film to a high level of art.

The film is about prostitution, literature and Kafkaesque alienation. There are also streaks of feminism running through the film, but the final scene seems to undo their validity.

The characters are so unfeasible that they border on absurdity. Mitsuko is a university profesor who leads a double life as a prostitute in Tokyo's sleazy love hotel district. She justifies it by saying that being a prostitute is female empowerment. Men have to pay for what they want.

Izumi is the bored housewife of a best-selling author. She feels that she's wasting her life, so in the week before her 30th birthday she becomes a model for an agency that sells videos of beautiful women. Her boundaries are constantly being pushed back. She says she will only appear in sexy clothing. Then she's persuaded to appear nude. Then she's persuaded to have a man on top of her pretending to be intimate. Finally she's persuaded to perform actual sex acts for the camera. When Mitsuko approaches her on the street and suggests she becomes a prostitute, she has nothing left to lose. She's degrading herself from one level to the next, however much Mitsuko claims that she's elevating herself.

The whole story is told in flashbacks during a murder case. The dead woman has been decapitated, so it's not clear who has been murdered or why.

If I had to sum up the film in one word, I would call it insane.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.de

Master Z (4 Stars)


Donnie Yen has finally stepped back from the Ip Man film series. After the second film he swore he wouldn't make any more films, but he was persuaded to make a third film. Now it's enough for him. "Master Z" is a spin-off from the series, continuing with the story of Cheung Tin-Chi, who was Ip Man's rival in the third film.

In the film his name is abbreviated to Tin, so that's what I'll call him in this article. The character is based on Sum Nung, a Wing Chun master who is still alive today and didn't want his name to be used. I don't understand why the film is called "Master Z". That name isn't used at all in the film.

It's not stated when the film takes place, but my guess is between 1965 and 1975, probably after Ip Man's death in 1972. Hong Kong is a place where corruption is unchecked. The British police are on the payroll of foreign gangsters. The Chinese police are honest, but they have to obey the wishes of the British police.

Tin hasn't just given up teaching Wing Chun, he no longer practises it. After a few years of work as a hired fighter, he uses the money that he's saved to buy a small grocery store. His moral integrity makes it impossible for him to stay out of trouble. When he sees drugs being sold on the street, first opium then heroin, he beats up the dealers, which leads to conflicts with the local gangs.

It's always a pleasure to see Michelle Yeoh in any film. She appears as the leader of the Cheung Lok gang, which she's trying to turn into a legitimate business. Her younger brother Tso Sai Kit opposes her and continues to sell drugs behind her back.

The fights are almost as spectacular as in the Ip Man films. I say almost, because there are brief occurrences of wire fu, something that the Ip Man films avoided, at least visually. I find the film's tone lighter than that of the Ip Man films. Its biggest disadvantage is that it doesn't have Donnie Yen, with the exception of a few flashback scenes.

Success Rate:  - 1.4

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Wednesday, 27 November 2019

Wine: Eberbach-Schäfer Trollinger-Lemberger

Two days ago I bought a bottle of Eberbach-Schäfer's wine made with a mix of the Trollinger and Lemberger grapes. This is a common mix that's made by most Württemberg vineyards. The dry taste of the Lemberger grapes is a good contrast to the fruity taste of the Trollinger grapes.

I'm glad that I didn't write a review immediately when I drank a glass of this wine two days ago. My immediate impression was, "Wow! This is the best wine I've ever tasted!" That's what I would have written. When I drank another glass today I thought differently. It's a good wine, but it didn't overwhelm me as much as it did two days ago. It doesn't have the same explosive after-taste as the Dry Trollinger, but it's very pleasant if drunk quickly.

The experts write:

The spicy bouquet has an aroma of blackberries, currants, cherries, pepper, nutmeg, herbs and lilac. Fleshy on the palate, dense, spicy, velvety, fine-meshed tannins, very nice fruit, it shows finesse and elegance and has a long after-taste.

I don't agree with the statement about the after-taste. It has a pleasant taste, but this taste fades fast. To put it a different way, the Dry Trollinger is a wine to be sipped slowly and savoured, but the Trollinger-Lemberger is a wine to be drunk quickly.

I might not call this the best wine I've ever tasted, but it's still an excellent wine.

Bram Stoker's Dracula (5 Stars)


This is my 19th horror film for November 2019. I feel awkward about writing this review. After watching it today I had a good idea what I wanted to write about it. Then I read my last review, which I wrote seven years ago, and guess what? Everything that I wanted to write today was already in my old review. This meant that I could either rack my brains trying to figure out something new to write, or I could just give up and write practically nothing, which is what I usually do when I write multiple reviews of a film.

There's one new factor that influences my review. A few months ago I read Bram Stoker's novel "Dracula" for the first time, so I understand more of the film's background than I did when I wrote my last review. I was rather shocked – I use the word deliberately – when I found that the whole novel is told by stringing together letters and diary entries. I've read other novels where letters and similar documents are quoted, but never any where the whole book is a series of quoted documents. It works very effectively, for the most part. My only criticism is of a newspaper article that's quoted, which is very eloquent and elaborate in its details. I think that a real newspaper article would stick to the facts of the case and not use too many flourishes. Maybe I'm being too pedantic. It's only one small fault in an otherwise perfect novel.

The film quotes diaries and letters through the voice of Anthony Hopkins as a narrator. That is borrowed directly from the novel. I didn't recognise it last time.

I don't know whether it's correct to say that this is the most accurate presentation of the novel in film. It's certainly more accurate than "Nosferatu" (1922), the 1931 version with Bela Lugosi and the 1958 version with Christopher Lee, but some of the minor, less well known adaptations may be more faithful to the book. The version that I'm reviewing now is more sexual than any of the other versions, and definitely more sexual than the book. This is something I like about the film. In the 1922 and 1958 versions Dracula is a harsh, unlikable character. In the 1931 version he's strangely quaint, but still not someone appealing to the viewer. The one played by Gary Oldman is a tragic character, and the viewer feels sympathy with him. He has an almost child-like naivety about him. He arrives in London, and the first thing he wants to do is go to the cinema, which in those days was all about showing short clips that only lasted a few minutes each. He sees naked women on screen, and he marvels at the advances of science. He doesn't understand how these images might seem immoral to Mina.


In the novel Mina's best friend Lucy is playful. In the film her portrayal hints that she's sexually promiscuous. At the very least, she likes to tease the men around her. This is her nature from the beginning of the film, but it becomes more exaggerated after she's bitten by Count Dracula.


The most sexual women in the film are the three brides of Dracula. In the book they aren't described in much detail, so the director Francis Ford Coppola is filling in the blanks. The way they seduce Jonathan Harker is so thrilling that I can't understand why he wanted to return to his fiancée Mina. Yes, he loved her, but I don't understand how any man could resist three scatily clothed vampiresses who caress him while they drink his blood. I would have forgotten Mina. Does that mean I'm a heartless rogue? No, it means I'm a man.


Whether it's the most accurate adaptation of Bram Stoker's book is a question for scholars to discuss. For me there's no doubt that this is the best adaptation, i.e. the most enjoyable adaptation. It's the Dracula film that I feel most willing to watch repeatedly.

Success Rate:  + 3.4

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Tuesday, 26 November 2019

Rabid [2019 version] (4 Stars)


This is my 18th horror film for November 2019. Halloween might be over, but the horror continues. This is a remake of the 1977 film with the same name directed by David Cronenberg. It keeps to the basic premise of the original film, but the details are different. Supposedly David Cronenberg was consulted and approved the changes.

"Rabid" was one of the films that I was most excited about seeing at this year's Fantasy Film Festival, but I wasn't able to see it because of the scheduling. What I mean is, from Sunday to Thursday I was unable to see the last film of the day because I would have missed my last bus home. Luckily the film was released on Blu-ray in England only a few weeks later, so I didn't have to wait long. The American release date isn't until February next year.


Rose Miller works as a fashion designer for the House of Gunter. She's surrounded by beautiful people, but she doesn't feel beautiful. She feels inadequate. Her plight is worsened when she has a motorbike accident which completely deforms her face. I'll refrain from publishing screenshots, because she really does look nasty.

A doctor is offering a radical new form of surgery. He claims that it's more than just plastic surgery, the process will completely transform her. She wakes up and finds that she's more beautiful than she ever was before. Men are unable to resist her. She's also more sexual than she was before, but she's rough. Very rough.


Very, very rough.

It doesn't end there. In the city a new strain of rabies breaks out, highly contagious. It starts with the men that Rose has been with. The disease is deadly, but its victims have time to pass it on to others before they die a horrible death. Rose seems to be the carrier.

The film started off very lightly, seeming like a superficial romp. That was probably deliberate, since hardly anything is as superficial as the fashion industry. Halfway through, as the horror began, the film became dark and terrifying, and I found it riveting until the final minutes.


The film is directed by the identical twin sisters Jen and Sylvia Soska. I gave their film "American Mary" one of my worst reviews ever, but even though it's been six years since I watched it, I can't get it out of my mind. I intend to watch it again soon, probably this month.


There's something sexy about girls with chainsaws. I blame Fred Olen Ray. I should never have watched "Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers".


But now I have to add Sexy Twins with Chainsaws to my ever-growing list of fetishes. I can't blame Fred for that. It's all the fault of the Soska Twins.

Actually, they prefer to call themselves the Soska Sisters. It must be the alliteration.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Monday, 25 November 2019

Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale (5 Stars)


This is my 17th horror film for November 2019. It's also a Christmas film. Am I allowed to do that? Christmas is only a month away, exactly one month, so it must be okay by now. We're almost there.


The film claims to be about the real Santa Claus. He's not a friendly old man who bounces children on his knee and gives them presents. He's a monster who eats little children, after beating them to tenderise the meat. As the story goes, he was trapped underground on the Finland-Russian border hundreds of years ago. Now he's escaped, and his loyal elves, who have been waiting all this time for his return, are gathering children, so that he will have something to eat on Christmas Day.

The film's tone is serious from beginning to end. By pretending not to be a comedy, it's all the more hilarious. You might not laugh out loud while you watch it, but you'll have to chuckle when you think about it afterwards.


I'm sorry to say that the film is now out of print. If you live in America, you can watch it on Amazon Prime. In other countries you'll have to look for it on Ebay.

Merry Christmas!

Success Rate:  + 0.0

Sunday, 24 November 2019

The Irishman (4 Stars)


I admire Martin Scorsese, even though he's not one of my favourite directors. He's created several great works of art in his career. "The Irishman" is one of his best films, although I had to lower my rating because it slowed down too much in the last half hour. However, I'm quite shocked by his recent statements that Marvel films "aren't cinema". That's such a stupid statement that I can hardly believe he really said it. It's not something that I would expect from a man of his stature. Doesn't he know what cinema is?

Let me tell him. Cinema is about human experience. People go to the cinema to be touched, which can happen in a variety of ways. If a film is a tragedy, people are dragged down. If a film is a romantic love story, people are uplifted. If a film is an action adventure, people sweat and their pulses race while they watch it. If a film is a horror film, people jump and are terrified. If a film is a pornographic film, people are sexually aroused.

Which of those is cinema? All of them, and there any many other examples that I could add. Do people like all of these types of films? I do, I'll watch anything, but most people have their favourite genres that they stick to. That's not a problem to me. If someone tells me that he doesn't like horror films I accept it, even though I think he's missing out. But if someone tells me that horror films aren't cinema, I shake my head and I say he doesn't know what he's talking about.

I've tried to understand Martin Scorsese by reading his "not cinema" quotes in context. I get it. Almost. He thinks that Marvel films don't touch human emotions. He thinks they don't offer intellectual enlightenment for the viewer. If he were a food connoisseur he would be saying that McDonald's isn't food because it's not a three star Michelin restaurant.

What he's saying is partially snobbish, partly ignorant. People walk into the cinema expecting to be touched in different ways. Not all Marvel films are the same. Has he ever watched them? Has he ever compared them with one another? "Deadpool" isn't the same as "Infinity War". What's wrong with Martin Scorsese? If he'd said, "I don't like Marvel films because fill-in-the-blank" I would nod and say that I understand him. If he says that Marvel films aren't cinema, my answer is "That's just dumb".

I enjoyed watching "The Irishman" today. I didn't enjoy it as much as "Avengers: Endgame", even though I'm an intelligent film fan. Nevertheless, I'll watch it again when it's available on Netflix. That's a certainty.

I wasn't aware that it's a true story until I walked into the cinema. I'd never heard of Jimmy Hoffa and the other characters in the film. That's probably because I grew up in England. I was never affected by American mob-influenced politics. "The Irishman" has educated me more than it's entertained me. The lasting impression that I took with me today is that it's Robert De Niro's best performance for a long time. I've been annoyed by his comedy roles over the last 20 years. I've always thought he could find better roles, and by playing Frank Sheeran he hit the jackpot.

I'll write about the plot the next time I watch it.

Saturday, 23 November 2019

Strange Circus (5 Stars)


This is my 16th horror film for November 2019, and it's a classic psychological horror story from Sion Sono. There are so many different elements thrown into the story that it would seem overloaded in the hands of a lesser director.

It's a very disturbing film. Some of the elements hit close to home through their realism. Mitsuko is growing up in an outwardly perfect home. Her father is a school headmaster, her mother is a fine, cultivated lady, and they live in a luxurious home. Appearances can deceive. She's being sexually abused by her father and physically abused by her mother. Mitsuko's father makes her hide in a cello case with a small spy hole, so she can watch while her parents have sex. At first her mother doesn't know they're being watched, but when she finds out things only get worse. The father has sex alternately with his wife and his daughter, and his wife begins to see Mitsuko as a rival for her husband's affections.  Mitsuko is frequently beaten without reason, and yet she still loves her mother. She wants to be her mother.


This is where the film's dialogue becomes confusing. As the years pass, Mitsuko's memories become unclear. She thinks that she's her mother, so that when things happen she doesn't remember which one of them it happened to. Was she the one being hit or the one hitting?


And there's the circus. It's a time, maybe the only time in Mitsuko's childhood, that she was really happy. The bizarre female clowns invite her on stage to put her head in a guillotine. Death can be a pleasurable release from all the suffering of life.

Those are just a few elements of the story. It's a complex plot that confuses the viewer when he first watches it, although everything becomes clear at the end. The film is terrifying, sometimes repulsive, but morbidly fascinating.


"Strange Circus" was released on DVD in 2005, but is now out of print. I'm desperate for a Blu-ray release, but I don't know if there will ever be one. I've been told that Sion Sono is a director who only lives for the moment. What I mean is, as soon as he's made a film it's done and gone. He has no interest in his old films, he's only concerned with his next film. That's tragic. He needs a partner to work by his side. Sion Sono can create art, while his partner is responsible as an intermediary with the fans, providing updated ideal versions of the older films that they still love. Are there any volunteers?