My intention today was to review the WZG Original Trollinger by comparing it
with the standard WZG Trollinger. Technically the standard bottle on the right
is the original wine, which confuses matters. It wasn't until I sat down to
start writing that I realised I've never written about the standard
Trollinger. I haven't drunk it for years. I usually have a bottle in the
kitchen for use as cooking wine, but I don't consider drinking it.
Yesterday I drank a glass of the WZG Original Trollinger and found it
pleasant, though slightly acidic. Today, realising I had a bottle in the
kitchen, I grabbed the standard WZG Trollinger for comparison. I must
have looked like a fool. I had a glass of wine in each hand, sipping
alternately.
The difference was much less than I expected. The Original wine is very
slightly milder, as I recognise when I drink the two wines side by side, but
if someone poured me a glass tomorrow I wouldn't be able to tell which one I'm
drinking. According to tables I've found online, the Original Trollinger has
residual sugar (Restsüße) of 12.8 grams per liter, whereas the standard
Trollinger has residual sugar of 15 grams per liter. Does this difference come
from different fermentation procedures? I don't know. All I know is that the
standard wine should taste slightly sweeter, but I can't tell the difference.
I don't think I'll return to either wine, apart from continuing to use the
standard Trollinger for cooking. I prefer the
Eberbach-Schäfer Trollinger.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Tick the box "Notify me" to receive notification of replies.