Is this a good film? A bad film? Or merely average? It depends on how you
judge it. It's a perfect performance by Robin Williams in a deeply emotional
film that made me cry at several points. That would normally guarantee a film
a five star rating. But when the emotions died down, after a cup of coffee, I
had to ask myself what junk I'd just watched. It presents an afterlife that
matches no existing religion and would be ridiculed by any atheist or
agnostic.
Robin Williams plays Dr. Chris Nielsen, a man who dies in a horrific car
accident. As a ghost he follows his loved ones, from the hospital to his funeral.
Then he falls asleep and wakes up in a painting. Yes, a painting. When he
walks through the fields of flowers they squelch, because they're all made of
paint. That's Nielsen's heaven. He's told by a man called Albert, at first his
only companion in the painting, that everyone can choose his own afterlife,
but Chris has subconsciously picked a picture painted by his wife. Later he
travels to other afterlifes, for instance to a playful kingdom created by his
daughter, who died four years previously. Just writing about it makes it sound
even more ridiculous.
Finally Chris finds out that his wife is in Hell, so he abandons Heaven to go
to find her and bring her back. That's a romantic notion, but would any
religion, even one, envisage such a possibility? Added to all of this, the
film's philosophy has reincarnation, but it's purely voluntary. Anyone who
grows tired of Heaven can return to Earth as a baby.
So what's the bottom line? Is the film good or bad? Heaven is a personalised
art project; Hell is a kind of psychological sinkhole; identity persists,
except when it doesn't; rules exist, except when love overrides them. The
film insists on emotional truth while playing fast and loose with its own
cosmology.
At times, this contrast is almost jarring. The same film that treats grief
with such grounded sensitivity also asks you to accept a universe governed
by what amounts to sentimental logic. Love conquers all, quite literally;
but not through any moral or philosophical framework that holds up to
scrutiny, rather through sheer narrative insistence. It’s less theology than
wish fulfilment dressed in painterly grandeur.
I think my four star rating is fair. Maybe more than the film deserves, but
I'll stick with it.
Films can be judged by the people who like them. Leslie Colligan was my
girlfriend for a few years while I lived in America. "What Dreams May Come"
was one of her favourite films. In retrospect, it's easy to understand why.
She had confused religious beliefs. She claimed to adhere to the ancient
Celtic religion, but she also believed in Heaven and Hell and reincarnation.
She was a confused person, so she was quick to accept the film's
pseudo-theological babble.
By the way, this photo shows her sitting in front of my CD collection. This
was one of the greatest tragedies in my life. When I became ill I gave her
$5000, more than enough to mail the CDs to me, but her new boyfriend, Thomas
Kuzilla of Dearborn Heights, Michigan, took the CDs into his own hands and
attempted to sell them back to me. I lost all 1800 CDs, with the exception of
six CDs that Leslie mailed to me behind his back. For all her faults, she had
a good heart; Thomas was pure evil. Would Leslie journey into Hell to bring
Thomas back? No; in the afterlife she'll know that he's not worth it.
Success Rate: - 1.1
![]() |
Order from Amazon.com |
| Order from Amazon.co.uk | |
| Order from Amazon.de |




No comments:
Post a Comment
Tick the box "Notify me" to receive notification of replies.