Friday 31 December 2021

General: Top Films of 2021


This is my personal list of the 10 best films of the year. As I remind you each year, to qualify for inclusion in the list I must have seen the film in the cinema during the year. This is the second year in a row that my list has been warped by the Coronavirus. German cinemas were closed for the first six months of the year. Normally I watch more than a hundred films in the cinema each year. This year I only watched 48. That's more than last year (23), but not enough to give me a good selection of films.


A DC film in first place? Until this year I would never have expected it. The sequel to "Suicide Squad" is gloriously trashy.


A Japanese film about a cafe owner who manages to send messages to himself from two minutes in the future.


Natasha Romanoff died in "Avengers Endgame", but this film tells the story of earlier events in her life.


The true story of Richard Williams, the father of the tennis stars Venus and Serena Williams.


The first documentary ever to appear in my yearly top 10.


Zombies, Nazis and flying sharks. Everything a good film needs.


A sequel that lives up to the original film.


An Irish vampire film. Just what the world needs!


The second film in my top 10 directed by Edgar Wright (after "The Sparks Brothers").


A good film, even if it has absolutely no connection with the comics.



That's my list for this year. I welcome comments from my readers, as well as your own top 10 lists. Don't be too hard on me, because I already know that I've omitted some good films due to my lack of cinema visits.

Fist of Legend (4½ Stars)


This is my last film of 2021. I picked it at random, which is unusual for me. Usually I select my next film a day or two in advance. It's a very good film, though I do have one big complaint: Jet Li isn't a very good actor, or at least he wasn't a good actor at this point in his career. His acting improved as he got older. His fighting was always excellent. Comparing him with Donnie Yen, who also played the role of Chen Zhen in "Legend of the Fist", Jet Li was more brutal. It's more obvious that he's fighting to the death.

"Fist of Legend" (1994) is a remake of "Fist of Fury" (1972), a famous film starring Bruce Lee. Despite the many differences, which I listed in my last review, it's obviously the same story. Both films contain a lot of racism, but it's on different levels.

I've often written that racism is stupid. I'm not taking back that statement, but "Fist of Legend" shows that racism is sometimes understandable. There's a scene where Chen Zhen isn't allowed to rent an apartment because his girlfriend is Japanese. Racism? Yes. Bigotry? Yes, but there was a reason for it. The Japanese were occupying China, so they were hated as an occupying force. I'm not saying that it was right for the landlord to hate Chen Zhen's girlfriend Mitsuko, but it was understandable in the context of China in the 1930's.

What I mean when I say that the racism is on different levels is that the Japanese are presented differently to the viewers. In "Fist of Fury" the Japanese are all bad. In 1972 the Japanese occupation of China was still fresh in the memories of the director and the other crew members. "Fist of Legend" was made 22 years later and is more conciliatory. We see that not all the Japanese are bad. Chen Zhen judges each person on his own merits. And as I already mentioned, he has a Japanese girlfriend.

I feel like re-watching a few of Jet Li's films. I own quite a lot on DVD, but I haven't watched them for many years. Maybe some time in the middle of next year. I'll see how I feel then. My main priority at the moment is a marathon of true stories, which I intend to start tomorrow.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Thursday 30 December 2021

Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (5 Stars)


In 1973 Todd Rundgren wrote the words "Love between the ugly is the most beautiful love of all". It's been a long time since I've listened to his album, "A Wizard, A True Star", considered by many to be his best album, but I'll never forget that song. It went through my head as I watched the final scenes of "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" tonight.

In the past I only rated it four stars. I don't know why. It deserves more. I might have been distracted by the imperfect picture quality. The picture is fuzzy, especially in the darker scenes. It's in need of a better remastering.


Beauty is in the eye of the beholder?

In case you're interested, I wrote more about the film in my 2018 review.

Success Rate:  + 0.5

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de



Addendum on 31st December, 2021

I just found out that "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" will be released on 4K disc on 29th March 2022. That will mean a new remastering. I'm excited.

Wednesday 29 December 2021

The Matrix Resurrections (4 Stars)


When this film was announced, 15 years after the third part, I groaned. What's the point? The Matrix trilogy was perfect as it was. Neo forged an alliance with the machines in order to eradicate the virus, Smith. Peace was made. The machines no longer tried to destroy Zion.

That's the question that I took with me into the cinema today. What's the point?

Let me explain it in a few words, without giving away any spoilers.

The film takes place 60 years after "The Matrix Revolutions". The peace treaty between the machines and the free humans has held. However, the Matrix is still necessary to provide the machines with the power they need. Neo died at the end of "Revolutions", but the machines somehow revived him and plugged him back into the Matrix to use him to keep the people in the Matrix contented. They also revived Trinity, though I don't understand why.

That's what the point is. The Matrix (a new version of the Matrix) is continuing without a war in the background.

The film is acceptable, though not up to the standards of the previous films. It's enjoyable, but it's unnecessary. It didn't need to be made. If it had been made at all, it should have been made shortly after the third film, when it was still fresh. Being made now, it looks like the studios are just trying to squeeze the last drops out of a cash cow. Will they succeed? I don't know. A friend of mine who works in the cinema told me that it wasn't performing as well as expected. Today, less than a week after it was released, the theatre was less than a quarter full. In comparison, "Spider-Man No Way Home" is still sold out every night in its second week.

Nobody wants to return to the Matrix.

P.S. Nobody except for me remained in the theatre to see the after-credits scene. Didn't they know about it, or didn't they care?

Tuesday 28 December 2021

Glass House (4 Stars)


I'm happy to say that this film has been released on Blu-ray in Germany, even if it's only available on DVD in England and America. I have the impression that Germany takes films more seriously than other countries. American films released in Germany always have the original English dialogue in addition to the dubbed German version. You can choose between dubbing and subtitles. Don't knock the dubbing. Even though I prefer subtitles, Germans dubbing is very good.

The film is a psychological thriller. Two young children, Ruby (16) and Rhett (11) are orphaned when their parents die in a car accident. The children are adopted by their godparents. At first it all seems too good to be true. Terry and Erin Glass live in a luxurious house overlooking the sea in Malibu. Slowly Ruby realises that it isn't all as ideal as it seems. Terry is deeply in debt to mobsters, and Erin is a drug addict. Ruby persuades Rhett that they need to run away, but what can children do?


17-year-old Leelee Sobieski is excellent in the role of Ruby Baker. She was my favourite actress for years. She retired from acting at the age of 29, giving as an excuse that 90% of film roles require sexual stuff. She's deluding herself. Of the 31 films that she made in her career, only two contained sexual stuff, and even that was tame. That's 6%. It's sad that such a wonderful actress as her should give up her career for a nonsensical reason. She could have continued acting for another 50 years without filming any more sexual stuff.

Success Rate:  - 1.3

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Monday 27 December 2021

King Richard (5 Stars)


Have you noticed the recent trend of not announcing film titles until the end of the film? It's been happening sporadically for decades, but it's become a big habit in the last two years. It became most apparent to be in this year's Stuttgart Fantasy Film Festival, where almost half the films showed the title at the end.

Today I went to see a local cinema's Sneak Peek, as they call it. Every Monday a film is shown before its official release date, but it's a heavily guarded secret what film it is until it starts. Today I sat down and waited with baited breath. The film started. Will Smith walked across the screen, evidently living in a medium quality black ghetto, not too primitive but definitely not posh. I groaned. Will Smith has never been one of my favourite actors, and today I was hoping for "The King's Man". But what was the film called? I had no idea. No title screen. Nothing. When the credits finally rolled, two and a half hours later, I still didn't know. It wasn't until the middle of the credits that the title appeared on screen: "King Richard".

That's unusual, even for today. Many films have the title at the end of the film, before the credits, but I've never seen a film that postpones the title until the middle of the credits. Curious.

Before I describe the film itself, I have to say that Will Smith's performance won me over. I'll never criticise him again. I think my prejudice against him stems from the "Fresh Prince of Bel-Air" series, which I absolutely hated. I should forget it. He's made many excellent films since then. I think that in every film of his that I've reviewed I write "I don't like Will Smith, but in this film he's great". I have to take that back. He's always great.

The film is the true story about Richard Williams, the father of the tennis stars Venus and Serena Williams. If I was paying attention properly, it takes place from 1990 to 1994. I'm sure about the ending year, but not the start. I'll have to check next time I watch it.

Was Richard Williams crazy or a visionary? If I'd known him at the time I would have said the former. He read that the winner of a women's tennis tournament earned as much in four days as he did in a year, so he decided that his two daughters would become tennis champions. Which two daughters? He already had three daughters, but he was referring to two daughters who weren't yet born. His wife wasn't even pregnant. Does he sound crazy already? The first part of his prophecy came true. His next two children were girls: Venus in 1980 and Serena in 1981. He began to teach them tennis from the age of four. They trained hard. They even had to practise at the local tennis court when it was raining.

And he kept pushing them. He found a professional trainer, Paul Cohen, who recognised the girls' talent and was willing to train Venus free of charge. He was only willing to coach one girl for free, and Richard couldn't afford to pay for Serena. All the time Richard insisted that the girls shouldn't neglect their school education. He said that Venus could only continue with her training if she was top of her class. That's heavy pressure. Most children would turn against a parent like that, but the girls loved their father.

Richard wanted to control the business for his daughters, often contradicting the advice of experts. As their manager, in fact if not in name, he decided what they would sign. When 14-year-old Venus was offered a $3 million advertising contract, he told her to turn it down. The next day the offer was increased to $4 million. He still told her to refuse it. Crazy? Less than a year later she signed a contract for $12 million. Richard Williams seemed crazy, but all of his dreams came true.


The film is overwhelmingly powerful. Richard Williams isn't always a pleasant character, but throughout the film Will Smith plays him in such a way that we sympathise with his faults. "King Richard" is one of the best films I've seen this year. It's almost time to put together my top 10 list for 2021. It'll have a high place.

Sunday 26 December 2021

The Matrix Revolutions (5 Stars)


The critics didn't like this film much. It only has a 35% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. That's all the proof we need that today's film critics are rotten. It's an excellent film that neatly ties up all the loose ends from the first two films. Peace is made between humans and the machines. There's no need for a fourth film.

Most of the people in the film are characters that we know from the previous films, but there are a few new faces.


The Trainman works for the Merovingian, transporting programs into and out of the Matrix.


Rama-Kandra is a program with human traits. He loves his wife and daughter. He believes in Karma. He's very soft spoken, and he makes an effort to explain to Neo that humans and computer programs aren't all that different. He tells Neo that he saw him visit the Merovingian in the last film. If you pay close attention you can see him in the Merovingian's restaurant.


Kamala is Rama-Kandra's wife. Sati is his daughter. It's not obvious where Sati should be sent. In the conversation with Neo it sounds like she'll be sent from the Matrix to the machine world, but later on it seems to be the opposite direction, because she's put in the care of the Oracle.

This is a very good film, whatever the critics say. I hope the fourth film is just as good.

Success Rate:  + 1.9

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

The Matrix Reloaded (5 Stars)


I intend to watch the new Matrix film this week, either Tuesday or Wednesday, so I'm rewatching the second and third films today. I already watched the first film in September.

Most people say that the sequels aren't as good as the first film. I agree, but I still think they're very good. "The Matrix" could have existed as a standalone film, but the sequels made sense. "Reloaded" (to shorten its title) shows Neo as the reluctant Messiah. Some believe in him, others don't. Many ascribe omnipotence to him and ask him to look over their loved ones. That's a heavy burden for any man to bear.


Nobody is a more dedicated believer than Morpheus. He's spent all his like searching for The One.


The Oracle has prophesied the coming of The One. In "Reloaded" we learn that she's not what Morpheus and everyone else believed. She's not human, she's a computer program, written to give humanity hope. Hope can be something good, but in this case hope is used to keep humanity under control. Hope is intended to manipulate mankind. Hope has manipulated Morpheus. And yet Morpheus still believes. His belief is no longer in the words of the Oracle, it's in the person of Neo himself.

Let's apply that to ourselves. Many people believe in a religion. Let's take Christianity as an example, although it could just as well be any other religion. Imagine that we were able to meet and talk with the people who wrote the Bible, the Evangelists and Paul. Imagine that they told us that Christianity is a fake, and they only invented it to make us better people. How would we react? Would we just close our ears and continue with our belief system?


The Oracle's co-conspirator is the Architect. He's the one who designed the Matrix. First he made it perfect, and then he destroyed it and rewrote it with flaws to make it more realistic to its inhabitants. We find out that the current Matrix in which Neo lives is the sixth iteration. It's Matrix 6.0. The Architect is unable to make it fully acceptable to its inhabitants, so the Oracle adds the element of hope.


Agent Smith returns after seemingly being destroyed in the first film. Do you remember his definition of humanity?

"I'd like to share a revelation I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species. I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with their surrounding environment, but you humans do not. You move to another area, and you multiply, and you multiply, until every natural resource is consumed. The only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet. You are a plague, and we are the cure".

It's ironic that Agent Smith himself has now become a virus. The other Agents just take over one human body at a time, but Agent Smith takes over body after body, until ultimately he'll be the only person inhabiting the Matrix.


New characters join the film, such as Collin Chou as Seraph. The role was offered to Jet Li, but he turned it down. He said he was afraid that his martial arts moves would be digitised and copied by the studios. I don't understand that. Couldn't his moves be copied in other ways?


Other new arrivals are the Merovingian and his wife Persephone. This adds a new flavour to the mythology of the Matrix franchise. The Merovingian is a rogue computer program. He exists in the Matrix, but he doesn't obey the machines who created it. He's a smuggler who secretly moves programs into and out of the Matrix. 

"Reloaded" has an incredible 15-minute car chase that's worth the price of the film in itself.  "Reloaded" is a great film, even if I didn't include it in my top 100. It's a film that deserved to be made.

Success Rate:  + 3.8

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Saturday 25 December 2021

Bride of Frankenstein (5 Stars)


This 1935 film is a sequel to "Frankenstein", made four years earlier. It's considered a sequel, but it's more like an afterthought. It's a film that contains many of the details from the novel that were omitted in the original film.

Both the Monster and Henry Frankenstein seemingly died at the end of the first film, but we see that they both survived. It's not clear how much time elapses after the initial scenes, because Henry's father dies and he becomes the new Baron Frankenstein.

"Bride of Frankenstein" differs from the original in several aspects. There's more humour, especially when Dr. Pretorius displays his miniature creations. There's also a prologue which emphasises that the film is only a story. Is this to make it less horrific for the sensitive audiences of the 1930's?

Dr. Pretorius is an original character who wasn't present in the novel, but he plays a major role in the creation of the Bride. I don't see any reason to add him to the film, except maybe for the sake of humour. It also shows redemption for Henry Frankenstein. After the first film Henry wanted to give up creating life; he wanted to give up trying to be God's equal. Dr. Pretorius is the new villain. First he uses friendly persuasion to make Henry create new life, and when that doesn't work he blackmails him by taking his wife hostage.

Success Rate:  + 3.0

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Friday 24 December 2021

Night Train (5 Stars)


This is my second Christmas film today. I planned it well in advance. It's a film I should watch at Christmas every year. "Rare Exports", which I watched earlier today, was a random choice, but the two films fit together very well. Both films begin on Christmas Eve and finish on Christmas Day. Actually, "Rare Exports" has a prologue three weeks earlier and an epilogue a year later, but the main action takes place on 24th and 25th December.


Leelee Sobieski shows off her skill at chopping a body into small pieces. Don't worry, he was already dead.


It's a messy job. At least she wears spectacles.

I've watched the film a lot, but today I noticed an error in the film for the first time when Steve Zahn speaks to the two Japanese businessmen playing Go.


This is what the board looks like when Steve first approaches the businessmen. He tries to give them advice, even though he has no idea how to play the game.


Then there's a close up of a businessman making a move. Most of the pieces have disappeared from the board.


Then the camera pans out, and the pieces are back again. Oops. This is what happens when a scene isn't filmed in chronological order.

That's only a minor fault. "Night Train" still deserves its place in my top 100 films. I just checked the list. It's in 49th place.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.de

Rare Exports (5 Stars)


Today I submitted to the pressure and decided to watch a Christmas film. I hope my readers will forgive me. It's difficult to completely avoid the Christmas spirit all around me.

The film is about an isolated village on the border between Finland and Russia, where most of the villagers work in the reindeer herding business. They find proof that Santa Claus isn't a myth, he's a real person who's still alive today. Then they do whatever they can to kill him.

Merry Christmas!

Success Rate:  + 0.0

Thursday 23 December 2021

Frankenstein (1931) (5 Stars)


It can be argued that the monster in the film "Frankenstein" isn't Boris Karloff, who walks around with a scarred face and bolts in his neck. The true monster is Henry Frankenstein, the man who created him. Note that his name is Henry in the film, not Victor as in Mary Shelley's novel. There doesn't seem to be any logical reason for renaming him. Maybe the director and the screenwriter never read the novel?

What I mean to say is that Henry Frankenstein is driven by madness. In the novel Victor Frankenstein wants to do something to benefit mankind. In the film Henry Frankenstein wants to be like God. He wants to replace God as the creator of life. His famous words after creating the monster are "In the name of God, now I know what it feels like to be God". This isn't atheism. It's a man who believes in an almighty God but thinks he can be God's equal.


The Monster, which I write with a capital M because it's the only name given him in the film, isn't really evil. He's an innocent creature who doesn't know what he's doing. For instance, he plays with a little girl by a lake. She throws flowers into the lake, showing him how they float. He throws the girl into the lake, expecting her to float as well. This apparent murder, which would be called manslaughter today, is what drives the villagers to hunt him down. The Monster is a tragic character. If Henry Frankenstein had trained him better he wouldn't have killed as many people.

This is a magnificent film, despite the strong deviations from the novel.

Success Rate:  + 43.8

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

88 Minutes (5 Stars)


My memory is weird. Sometimes I can clearly remember a film that I only watched once 30 years ago. Then there's "88 Minutes", which I've watched at least three times, but when I sat down to watch it today I could hardly remember it. It was like watching a completely new film.

Al Pacino was nominated for a Golden Raspberry award as Worst Actor for this film. That's unfair. There's nothing at all wrong with his performance. Leelee Sobieski was also nominated as the Worst Supporting Actress. That's terrible. Sometimes the critics have no taste at all.


Success Rate:  - 0.9

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Wednesday 22 December 2021

West Side Story (2021 Version) (4½ Stars)


This is the first film that Steven Spielberg has remade in his long career. If he had to remake any film, it was a bold move to pick this one. The 1961 version won 10 Oscars, so it's difficult to live up to the original. On the other hand, I trust Steven Spielberg to make good films. He's not my favourite director, but he's never made a bad film. If I go to see one of his films in the cinema I won't be disappointed, whatever it's about.

I can't comment on whether the new version as good as the original. I vaguely remember seeing it on television when I lived with my parents, but I can barely remember it. If it had been available on a streaming service I would have watched it in preparation. So I went to the cinema to see "West Side Story" as a new film. Except it wasn't completely new to me. As the film ran I realised that I knew all the songs. This must have been from hearing them on the radio as I grew up. My parents listened to BBC's Radio 2 for hours every day as background music. I didn't consciously pay attention to the radio, but the songs that I heard a lot were imprinted in my memory.

The film is overwhelming. It has a deep emotional depth. The dance numbers are nothing short of amazing. As a social commentary, the story is just as relevant today as it was in 1961. Racism and bigotry abounded then, and it still exists today. Maybe the difference is that racism was more acceptable then. I mean it was more acceptable on an institutional level. Nobody was arrested for making racist utterances. Today's racists have to be more careful where they utter their disgusting words.

My main problem is the lack of subtitles for the Spanish dialogue. On the way home I read an interview with Steven Spielberg in which he said that this was deliberate. He wanted typical English speaking Americans to feel excluded, the same way that the characters in the film feel excluded. I think this is a mistake, and I hope that subtitles will be added when the film is released on disc.

The film's story takes place in 1957, but there's a serious blunder in the props used. In a shop that sells comics we see an issue of X-Men. Oops! The first issue of X-Men wasn't released until September 1963.

Monday 20 December 2021

Bram Stoker's Dracula (5 Stars)


I did it yesterday, so I'll do it again today. Instead of writing anything new about this film, I'll just tell you to read my last review. I'll just give you a screenshot of the beautiful Winona Ryder as Jonathan Harker's fiancée Mina.

Maybe I'm just not in the mood for writing this month. I shan't force myself. Anything that I wrote today would be substandard.

Ha! I used the word "just" three times in my first four sentences. That's bad writing style. I really am substandard this week. Let's see if I'm in better form next month.

Success Rate:  + 3.4

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Sunday 19 December 2021

Dracula (1958 version) (5 Stars)


It's six years since I last watched Hammer Horror's version of "Dracula". I remembered how good it is, but I'd forgotten how much it deviates from Bram Stoker's novel.


Success Rate:  + 13.4

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Saturday 18 December 2021

TV Series: The Avengers Season 4


"The Avengers" is a British television series that was broadcast from 1961 to 1969. It was made up of six seasons (arguably seven). It went through various style changes during its run. The first three seasons were spy thrillers. The fourth season began with spy thrillers, but it gradually introduced science fiction and fantasy elements, which took over as the series continued. Comical elements became prevalent in the fifth season, and were strongest in the sixth. In particular, in the sixth season people repeatedly died under ridiculous circumstances.

The cast changed over the years. In the first season the main character was Dr. David Keel, a police doctor, who was accompanied in most episodes by a mysterious man called John Steed. In the second season Dr. Keel no longer appeared, and Steed became the main character. It was hinted that Steed was a British secret agent, although we didn't see any of his organisation until the sixth season. Steed was accompanied by various partners in the second season, of which the most famous was Cathy Gale. In the third season she was his only partner and appeared in every episode.

Steed's partner in the fourth and fifth seasons was Emma Peel. She isn't introduced in season four; she's just there in the first episode, as if she'd always been there. In the fourth season they seem to be equal partners, but in the fifth season Steed seems to be the senior partner, requesting Peel's help whenever he needs it. I say "seems", because their relationship is never explicitly described. It's all up to the viewer's interpretation.

There's no romance between Steed and Emma, although there's frequent light flirting. Steed never calls Emma by her first name. To him she's always Mrs. Peel. In the second episode of the fourth season, "The Murder Market", Steed suggests that Peel should find another husband. This means that she's either divorced or widowed. This makes sense, because we never see her husband throughout the whole two seasons. However, at the end of the fifth season her husband, who looks remarkably similar to Steed, collects her and drives her away. This is strange, and I think it's a mistake.

Most of the episodes of the first season have been lost, i.e. the original tapes were reused. Only three of the 26 episodes still exist. The rest of the series is still available. The second and third seasons can be bought on DVD, but the quality isn't always perfect, due to the technology of the time. The other three seasons have been remastered for Blu-ray, and the quality is excellent.


John Steed is a perfect gentleman. He always wears a suit with a bowler hat and a tie, and he carries an umbrella. I have to add something here about the definition of gentleman, something that I only realised a few years ago. Most people say that a gentleman is someone who's polite and treats women with respect. By that definition I'd be a gentleman. But there's more to it, as is apparent in old films, and even in "The Avengers". Being a gentleman is also about clothing. If a man dresses as elegantly as Steed, he's assumed to be a gentleman. If a man dresses like me, with ripped jeans and over-sized T-shirts, I don't qualify as a gentleman, however politely I may act. Another factor is the social standing, but that's something that's displayed by the clothing, so I consider it secondary.

The villains in Season 4 of "The Avengers" are all gentlemen, or at least they are in the 12 episodes that I've watched so far. They dress exquisitely and speak perfectly, however evil they may be. They're all from the upper or upper middle classes. They're noble landowners, politicians or company owners. Steed is in his element when mixing with them.


Sometimes I hear fans of "The Avengers" claim that Steed never used a gun. There are several cases in the first three episodes of Season 4 where he uses a gun, but he doesn't use a gun in the following episodes. I'll be paying attention to this as I continue with the series.


There's no doubt about whether Emma Peel uses a gun. She's seen carrying a gun in almost every episode.


Not that she needs a gun. In episode five, "Death at Bargain Prices", she's threatened by a man with a gun. She slowly walks towards him clicking her fingers and saying "Give me the gun". He hesitates, his eyes fixed on her fingers, until she's close enough to kick the gun out of his hand. Something about this scene is immensely sexy. I watched it on 23rd October 1965, when I was 10, and I didn't see it again until I owned the series on DVD in late 2003. That was 38 years later, and yet I remembered the scene perfectly. It imprinted itself on my brain.

There's something that I haven't mentioned before now. When I bought my first DVD player in 2003, it wasn't primarily to watch films. I bought it in order to watch TV series. I had four series on my shopping list: "Highlander", "The Avengers", "Black Scorpion" and "La Femme Nikita". (In that order). I bought them as quickly as possible, and my first 12 months were spent watching more TV series than films. I added "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" to my list the next year. At some point I might return to watching series more than films, but I haven't reached that point yet, even though the number of series I want to watch is steadily mounting.


Emma Peel has a hint of sexiness in her whole posturing. She always has a sly smile on her face, however great the danger. My daughter Fiona used to watch "The Avengers" with me, and she called Emma Peel the woman who's never afraid. That's an apt description.

The episodes are all stand-alone stories. Theoretically, they can be watched in any order. The episode order on the Blu-rays that I bought this year is different to the order on the DVDs that I bought in 2003. On the DVDs the episodes are in their broadcast order. On the Blu-rays they're in their production order, which is almost but not quite the same. It's claimed that different ITV regions in England broadcast the episodes in different orders, but I haven't been able to verify this. I rely on the list that's been published on the Epguides web site.

Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de