Showing posts with label Gabriel Byrne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gabriel Byrne. Show all posts

Thursday, 30 April 2026

Ballerina (5 Stars)


This is a film that's grown on me. I gave it five stars from its first viewing, but I've always added "it's not as good as the John Wick films". Now I'm not so sure. "Ballerina" is different to the John Wick films, but it's just as good, in its own way. John Wick himself was always a master assassin, from the first film onwards, but Eve Macarro is a new recruit to the Ruska Roma, who needs to be trained from the ground up. She's like "Nikita", or more like "Red Sparrow"


"Ballerina" doesn’t so much expand the John Wick mythology as refract it; a side-step rather than a leap forward, yet one that reveals new textures within a world that had, by "John Wick Chapter 4", begun to feel almost sealed.

Set against the familiar framework established in John Wick and elaborated through "John Wick Chapter 2" and "John Wick Chapter 3", the film’s most immediate contribution is perspective. Where those entries centred on John Wick as both participant and anomaly, Ballerina shifts the focus to an initiate; someone shaped by the system from the outset rather than dragged back into it. This alone alters the tone. The mythology is no longer something glimpsed from the outside or resisted from within; it becomes an environment, almost a culture, that produces its own agents.

The Ruska Roma, previously a striking but secondary presence, moves into the foreground. What had once seemed like a stylistic flourish, ballerinas trained alongside assassins, now reads as a fully realised institution with its own internal logic. The film leans into the idea that artistry and violence are not merely juxtaposed, but intertwined. Discipline, repetition and performance become the connective tissue between dance and killing, suggesting that the mythology’s rituals are not confined to coins and markers, but embedded in the very bodies of its practitioners.

This emphasis on training and transformation adds a layer that the earlier films only hinted at. In the mainline series, assassins simply are; their skills are presented as faits accomplis. Ballerina asks how such figures are made. The answer is not comforting. The mythology expands to include systems of control that feel less like honour codes and more like indoctrination. The world of assassins, once alluring in its elegance, acquires a harder edge; its beauty is revealed as something constructed through coercion.

At the same time, the film subtly recalibrates the role of institutions like the The Continental. In the earlier films, the Continental functioned as a neutral sanctuary, a space where rules imposed order on chaos. Here, its neutrality feels more ambiguous. Seen from the perspective of someone raised within the system, it is less a refuge than a checkpoint; one node in a network that monitors, regulates and ultimately constrains. The mythology becomes less romantic, more systemic.

Crucially, "Ballerina" resists the temptation to over-escalate. After the globe-spanning, rule-bending climax of "John Wick Chapter 4", it would have been easy to introduce an even higher authority or a deeper layer of conspiracy. Instead, the film narrows its focus. The High Table remains distant, almost irrelevant; what matters are the local structures, the immediate relationships and the personal costs of participation. This contraction paradoxically enriches the mythology. By showing how the system operates on the ground, it makes the larger hierarchy feel more credible.

There is, however, a tension at the heart of this approach. By explaining how assassins are trained, by detailing the mechanisms that produce them, the film inevitably demystifies aspects of the world that were once left to the imagination. The danger, as in "John Wick Chapter 3", is that myth hardens into procedure. The more we see, the less we wonder.

Yet "Ballerina" mitigates this by shifting the emotional centre. The mythology is no longer primarily about rules; it is about identity. What does it mean to belong to this world if you never had a choice? Can its codes be internalised without being questioned? In this sense, the film doesn’t just add lore; it interrogates the cost of that lore on those who live inside it.

In the end, "Ballerina" functions as a kind of echo within the larger saga. It doesn’t reshape the mythology in the way the sequels did, nor does it attempt to conclude it. Instead, it deepens it laterally, filling in the spaces between what we already know. The result is a world that feels less like a series of elegant rules and more like a lived-in system; one that creates its own adherents, and perhaps its own victims.

It’s a quieter form of expansion, but a meaningful one. If the John Wick films built a myth, Ballerina shows how that myth is sustained; not by legends like John Wick, but by the countless figures shaped in its image.

Success Rate:  - 0.4

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Sunday, 8 June 2025

Ballerina (5 Stars)


As far as I can recall, this is the first film I've watched twice in the cinema this year. It's worth it. Unfortunately, it looks as if it won't make a profit. The critics agree that it's a good film, and those who've watched it praise it, but somehow it can't tempt people into the cinema. Isn't the poster appealing? Isn't the trailer exciting? Or are people just sick of John Wick after four films and a mini-series? They don't know what they're missing. Or maybe they just want to wait till it arrives on streaming.

John Wick himself has a short appearance in the film. Two appearances, actually. The first is a brief cameo. The second is about ten minutes towards the end of the film. It's not necessary. I think these scenes were only added to tempt John Wick fans into the cinema, which obviously hasn't worked. With a small amount of rewriting he could have been removed without harming the film in any way.

Wednesday, 4 June 2025

Ballerina (5 Stars)


I expected this film to be brilliant, and I wasn't disappointed. Ana de Armas is splendid in the title role. She knows how to fight like a girl, which is enough to send the men running for cover.


Monday, 11 May 2020

The Brylcreem Boys (4 Stars)


"Some day when this war is over, some of us will be dead. The rest of us will go back to eating, drinking and making love".

Most people know that Switzerland remained independent during the Second World War. Less people know that there was another independent country in Europe: Ireland. That's where this film takes place, from September to December 1941.

In September 1941 the Canadian pilot Miles Keogh was involved in a dogfight with a German pilot. They shot each other down and crashed a few miles from one another. At first he thinks he's in France, but he soon discovers that he's in the Irish Republic. He hitches a ride into the next town and heads to a pub for a drink. He hasn't even finished his pint before Irish military police arrest him and transport him to a POW camp. (The camp isn't named in the film, but it's Curragh, 30 miles Southwest of Dublin). What shocks him even more is that the German pilot, Count Rudolph von Stegenbek, is sitting opposite him in the military vehicle.

On arrival, Miles finds himself prisoner in the most bizarre POW camp of WW2. The Swiss concept of neutrality is to be everyone's friend, but the Irish concept of neutrality is to be everyone's enemy. Whenever anyone in uniform is found in Ireland, whatever nationality, he's sent to Curragh POW camp. The German and the Allied prisoners are kept in the same camp, separated only by a barbed wire fence. They will be kept until the end of the war, however long that is. They're kept in relative comfort. It's more like a holiday camp than a prison. The officers have large rooms, the normal airmen and seamen have smaller rooms. There are pubs for the prisoners. The camp reports the names of the prisoners to the embassies of their countries, so that their wages can be sent to them on a regular basis.

As if that isn't unusual enough, the prisoners are allowed to leave the camp and visit the local village with a day pass. All they have to do is promise to return. Germans have no way of returning to Germany, but in case British airmen flee to Northern Ireland or England, they'll be sent back. The Irish government has made an agreement with the British government that all escapees will be returned.


The camp's commander is played by Gabriel Byrne. He's quiet and relaxed. He just wants everyone to get along. "We don't want your war here", he tells the men when they start shouting abuse across the fence. The problem is worse if the prisoners start fights in the village, when they're no longer segregated. If they create a disturbance they're arrested, and they'll lose their day pass privileges.

War is the ideal breeding ground for racism. The Allied forces think all Germans are evil, and the Germans think all of the Allied forces are evil. Miles especially is hotheaded, and he has a reason for it. Count Rudolph (who prefers to be called Rudi) killed his co-pilot. Miles tries to start fights, but Rudi tells him that they should get along. The German airforce has a long tradition of gentlemanly conduct. When they fight they respect their enemies, and they attack the planes, not the pilots. If a pilot dies in an attack it's considered an unfortunate accident.

Being imprisoned together is educational. Not everyone is the same. Everybody has his own history, on both sides of the war. There are hardcore Nazis among the prisoners, but Rudi isn't one of them. He's an officer and a gentleman, fighting for his country, not his leader. When he's told about German atrocities he's shocked and says he doesn't believe Germans could ever do such things. On the Allied side, not everyone is committed to the war. Sam Gunn is an American film star, and he only volunteered with the RAF for a few months because he wanted publicity.


The conflict between Miles and Rudi takes on a personal note when they both fall in love with the Irish farm girl, Mattie Guerin. Miles meets her by chance, but Rudi is an old friend of her father from before the war. She's played by Jean Butler, a professional dancer appearing in her first film. She danced in Riverdance with Michael Flatley for three years, and she has a short scene in "The Brylcreem Boys" where she can show off her talent.


This is an unusual film based on unusual events. If the film has a message, it's that we should learn to tolerate one another, even in the middle of war. That's a good message, but it's easier said than done.

Saturday, 20 April 2019

End of Days (5 Stars)


It's Easter. What better way to celebrate than Arnold Schwarzenegger being crucified in New York?

What do my readers think about this film? I'd really like to discuss it. I'm not blind to its faults. The film's premise is ridiculous, but everything else about it is amazing. If you can turn your brain off and accept the idea behind the film, everything else is wonderful: the acting, the pacing, the thrills, the action sequences. That's what I think, anyway. I'd like to hear from my readers. Would anyone like to write a full review of the film?

Success Rate:  + 0.1

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Wednesday, 27 February 2019

End of Days (5 Stars)


This is a film that's been slammed by the critics, despite being a moderate box office success. I know what's wrong with the film. The plot doesn't always make sense. Or rather, the film's premise doesn't make sense, but if you close your eyes to these faults it's an excellent supernatural action film. It stands out as a film in which Arnold Schwarzenegger proves he can act well when he wants to. That doesn't happen often.


Gabriel Byrne's performance as the Devil is stunning. He's exactly as I imagine the Devil to be. He's not openly evil, but he has a seductive way of talking. He has a way of making his point of view seem positive. He sounds very persuasive when he tells people he's the good guy and God's the bad guy.


Nevertheless, this is Arnold Schwarzenegger's film. He's moving as an ex-policeman who's lost his faith. How can a man without faith stand up against the Devil? Only by finding his faith once more.

Success Rate:  + 0.1

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

I'm thinking about doing something different next month. I'll be on holiday for two weeks, and I doubt I'll have time to write reviews, at least not detailed reviews, so I'll post at least one holiday photo each day.

I also intend to listen to all of Klaus Schulze's albums in order. At the moment I don't think I know how to review music. All I can say about a piece of music is whether I like it or not. If I don't know what to write I'll just post a picture of the CD cover and a list of the tracks. I might start early next month, or I might wait until after I return from holiday. Probably the latter.

My Ai Shinozaki month will end tomorrow, and it wasn't as popular as I expected. I doubt I'll do anything like that in future. Or maybe I will. Don't expect me to be predictable.

In September and October last year I did a "Video of the Day" feature. I never intended to stop posting video reviews, I just haven't had time. I'll start again soon. I still watch YouTube videos almost every day, mostly children's videos, and I ought to write about the better videos. So far I've only reviewed children's videos, but I might write about other videos.

I'll continue with my Marvel Years posts. I'm going to make an effort to increase the frequency to twice a week, if possible. They take a lot of time to write. So far I'm up to April 1967. I want to continue to 1972 at least, maybe as far as 1984. I still don't know for certain. At the moment I'm writing about 10 comics each month. This will increase in mid 1968, which is the year when Marvel drastically increased its output. By the late 1970's I'll be reviewing less comics, because there will be more titles that I don't consider to be canon.

Is there anything else that you, my readers, want me to do? Films will always be my main focus, but I'm willing to add other things as I go along. Leave me a comment below.

Wednesday, 27 June 2018

Hereditary (4 Stars)


This is a difficult film for me to review without giving away spoilers. It's a horror film, but it changes direction frequently, moving seamlessly from sub-genre to sub-genre. If I wanted to explain the film I'd have to tell you most of the plot.

Annie Graham is an artist who makes miniature models based on real life. Her creations look like doll houses, but they're much more detailed. When her mother dies she deals with it by making miniature models of her. Less than a week after the funeral her mother's body is stolen from the grave, but Annie's husband Steve doesn't tell her about it. There are apparitions in the house. Annie sees her mother, which drives her to the verge of a nervous breakdown.

Soon afterwards Annie's daughter Charlie is killed in a car accident. Annie blames her son Peter, the driver, for Charlie's death. Peter blames Annie, because she had made him take Charlie to a party she didn't want to go to. This drives Annie closer to despair. At a support group for people who are mourning a lost one she meets a woman called Joan who teaches her a ritual which will summon Charlie.

I'll stop there. The plot has twists and turns all the way to the final scene.

The film has an atmosphere of foreboding throughout. The Graham family lives in such a creepy old house in the woods that I would have nightmares even without anyone dying. The film overwhelmed me. I need to see it again.

Saturday, 21 May 2011

End of Days (5 Stars)


This is a film I enjoy a lot. I saw it in the cinema when it was first released in 1999, and I've often watched it since, first on videotape, now on DVD. I know that there are lots of things that can be criticised about it. The plot has more holes than Swiss cheese. An example is the priest's explanation of the number 666 in Revelation 13:18. "Prophets sometimes see the future upside down. The number isn't really 666, it's 999, which signifies our year, 1999". Doh! That's amazing theology, isn't it?

But I still like the film. Why? First of all, this is Arnold Schwarzenegger's best performance as an actor, even better than his acting in "Terminator". Gabriel Byrne is the ultimate in cool as the Devil. The action scenes are exciting. The underground cults in New York encompassing doctors and police detectives are scary but plausible. Just close your eyes to the illogical elements, and you'll enjoy this film too.