Monday, 20 April 2026

Ambulance (4 Stars)


Michael Bay's "Ambulance" is a loud, breathless exercise in controlled chaos that succeeds on its own terms. It takes a simple premise, a desperate bank robbery gone wrong, and stretches it into a near two-hour chase sequence that rarely lets up.

The standout feature is, unsurprisingly, the driving. The film's lengthy car chases are relentless, jittery and often astonishingly staged, with Bay turning Los Angeles highways into a shifting maze of ambulances, police cruisers and military response units. The camera rarely sits still; drones, dash cams and sweeping aerial shots create a constant sense of motion that borders on overwhelming but feels deliberately so.

Plot and character work are minimal, which is fine here. "Ambulance" is less interested in motivation than momentum, with Jake Gyllenhaal and Yahya Abdul-Mateen II driving much of the tension through escalating panic and strained brotherhood dynamics. It's scrappy rather than deep, but that suits the film's stripped-back survival structure.

It won’t convert anyone who finds Michael Bay's style exhausting, but for viewers willing to go along with the noise and velocity, it delivers exactly what it promises: an extended, high-octane chase film that barely pauses to breathe.

Success Rate:  - 0.7

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de


Saturday, 18 April 2026

Kill Bill (5 Stars)


Oops I did it again. I went to see "Kill Bill" for a second time in two days. When I bought my tickets it seemed necessary, because it was claimed it would never be released on disc. Quentin Tarantino has  changed his mind, fortunately. But it was still good to see the film again.

One recent change to the complete film that wasn't in the 2011 version shown at the Cannes Film Festival is a 12-minute after-credits scene, called "Kill Bill: The Lost Chapter". It's a fully animated sequence featuring Gogo's sister Yuki. It doesn't really belong to the film, especially not at the end. When I own the film on disc I'll probably watch it separately, not tagged on to the end.

One thing that amused me tonight was the man sitting in the seat next to me. I always respect people who go to the cinema alone, like me, not with their partners or friends. It shows that they take films seriously. This man was different. During the fight scene in the House of Blue Leaves he covered his eyes every time a head or an arm was chopped off. Someone should have warned him that it would be so violent.

Friday, 17 April 2026

Kill Bill (5 Stars)


Finally! I've waited 22 years to see this film. "Kill Bill" was originally released as two films in 2003 and 2004. Quentin Tarantino re-edited the two films into a single film in 2011, but it was only released in Japan. In December 2025 it was finally shown in America at a few select cinemas and minor re-editing. Conflicting statements were made, possibly deliberate misinformation to raise expectations among film fans. First Tarantino said the film would only be shown in cinemas and not be made available for home viewing on disc or streaming. That was depressing. Then it was said that it would be released on Blu-Ray, but not streaming. Ideal! For me, at least. Then I was surprised to see that it was dropped onto Amazon Prime today, without prior announcement.

My local cinema was only showing the film twice, today and tomorrow. I bought tickets for both days. Then, last Monday, they announced that it would be lengthened to four days, probably because both days were sold out.

The main changed are

1. Oren Ishii's origin story is lengthened.

2. The fight scene in the House of Blue Leaves is in colour throughout, not partially black and white.


One small change that I noticed immediately was that the Klingon proverb was missing from the opening scene. I've read theories why Tarantino edited it out, but I miss it.

The official name of the film is "Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair". Giving it that name makes it sound like two films that have been stitched together. I prefer to call it "Kill Bill", which emphasises that it's a single film that was chopped in two.

Thursday, 16 April 2026

From Dusk Till Dawn (5 Stars)


"From Dusk Till Dawn" is a film that practically splits itself in half; a crime thriller mutates into a vampire siege, and the clash between its two central families sits right at the heart of that transformation.

On one side we have the Gecko brothers, Seth and Richie; criminals defined by chaos, instinct and a complete absence of moral restraint. George Clooney plays Seth as cool and calculating, a man who understands violence as a tool, while Quentin Tarantino makes Richie something far more disturbing; impulsive, erratic, and barely tethered to reality. Their family bond is real, but it's warped; loyalty exists, yet it's rooted in survival rather than care.

In stark contrast stands the Fuller family; a broken but fundamentally decent unit led by Jacob, a former preacher struggling with his faith after personal tragedy. Harvey Keitel gives Jacob a weary gravity, a man trying to hold his children together even as his beliefs crumble. Kate and Scott represent a more recognisable familial dynamic; tension, grief and affection all coexisting in an uneasy balance. Where the Geckos are united by crime, the Fullers are held together by something more fragile; the remnants of love and moral responsibility.

The early part of the film thrives on this contrast. The Geckos dominate through fear, forcing the Fullers into submission, yet there's a quiet sense that the balance could shift at any moment. The Fullers' decency becomes a kind of resistance; they endure rather than retaliate, and that endurance gives them a moral strength that the Geckos lack.

When the film pivots into horror at the Titty Twister, the dynamic evolves rather than disappears. Faced with a supernatural threat, the distinction between the families begins to blur. Survival becomes the common ground; Seth's ruthlessness suddenly has value, while Jacob's moral compass regains purpose. The Geckos' amorality and the Fullers' ethics, once opposed, now function as complementary traits in a fight neither family could survive alone.

What makes "From Dusk Till Dawn" compelling isn't just its genre switch; it's how that shift forces both families to confront what defines them. The Geckos, stripped of control, reveal flickers of reluctant cooperation, while the Fullers, pushed to extremes, discover a capacity for violence they would never have chosen.

By the end, the film suggests that family is less about moral purity and more about what people are willing to do for one another under pressure. The Geckos start as predators and the Fullers as victims, but the night reduces everyone to the same basic instinct; survive, protect, endure. It's in that levelling that the film finds its strange, blood-soaked unity.

Success Rate:  + 1.1

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Wednesday, 15 April 2026

Two Orphan Vampires (5 Stars)


"Two Orphan Vampires" is Jean Rollin's 18th film, made in 1997. It's one of his last films, but in many ways it's his most typical film. It barely pretends to belong to the horror genre, even as it trades in vampires, blood and nocturnal wandering. The action, if it can even be called action, is downplayed. The film is like an abstract painting, creating emotions in everyone who watches it.

The film follows two blind girls who live in an orphanage. What the nuns don't know is that they're only blind in the daytime. At night they can see everything in a blue tint. They sneak out of the orphanage to drink blood, sometimes human blood, sometimes animals. They're not vampires in the conventional sense. They frequently live and die. How often they remain dead varies, but they always claw their way back to the surface. Dying is a time of rest for them. They've lived for a long time. In the 15th Century they were worshipped as Goddesses by the Aztecs. In a single ceremony 40,000 men were laid out for them to feed, all of them volunteers. Towards the end of the film we find out that they're much older, and there are hints that they've existed since the beginning of time, before Adam and Eve.

Rollin’s pacing is always languid, but here it feels almost defiant. Scenes linger far beyond what mainstream storytelling would allow; conversations drift, actions feel ritualistic, and long stretches pass where nothing much happens in a traditional sense. Yet this isn’t indulgence for its own sake. The slow rhythm creates a kind of trance state, pulling the viewer into the same suspended existence as the protagonists; caught between day and night, blindness and vision, innocence and predation.

The two leads carry the film less through dialogue than presence. Their performances are deliberately stylised, almost affectless at times, which only adds to their otherworldly quality. They don’t behave like typical horror figures, nor like realistic teenagers; they exist somewhere in between, embodying Rollin’s recurring fascination with fragile, doomed femininity. There’s an undercurrent of sadness running through everything they do, as though their vampirism is less a curse than an extension of an already isolated existence.

Visually, the film is steeped in a muted, dreamlike atmosphere. Rollin contrasts the drabness of daytime interiors with the freedom of the night, where cemeteries, empty streets and shadowy corners become spaces of strange beauty. His usual gothic imagery is present but subdued, less about spectacle and more about texture and feeling. The result is a Paris that feels detached from reality; familiar, yet ghostly and removed.

Anyone approaching "Two Orphan Vampires" expecting tension, scares or even a clear narrative arc will likely come away frustrated. This is a film that resists those pleasures almost entirely. But for those willing to meet it on its own terms, it offers something rarer; a melancholy, dreamlike meditation on isolation, identity and the strange freedoms of the night. It’s less a story you follow than a mood you inhabit, and it lingers precisely because it never fully resolves into something concrete.

Tuesday, 14 April 2026

Isn't it romantic? (5 Stars)


When I first reviewed "Isn't it romantic?" in 2019 I said that it was a Netflix original film and would probably not be released on disc. Fortunately, I was wrong. It took a few years, but now it's available on Blu-Ray in the USA. Click on the image above if you don't believe me. It's region free, as all Blu-Rays should be, so you can play it anywhere.

It's a bright, self-aware romantic comedy that plays like both a parody and a celebration of the genre it mocks. Directed by Todd Strauss-Schulson and starring Rebel Wilson, the film follows a cynical New Yorker who wakes up trapped inside a glossy romcom fantasy world after a head injury.

What makes it work is its willingness to lean into the clichés it's satirising; sweeping musical numbers, impossibly attractive love interests and picture-perfect cityscapes are all pushed to absurd extremes. Wilson carries the film with sharp comic timing, while Liam Hemsworth and Adam DeVine knowingly play into archetypes of the genre.

It doesn't completely escape the conventions it pokes fun at, and its message about self-love is delivered a little too neatly, but that's arguably part of the joke. Light, fast-paced and intermittently clever, it's an enjoyable riff on romantic comedy tropes rather than a full reinvention of them.

Success Rate:  - 0.4

Monday, 13 April 2026

Sagrada Reset Part 2 (4 Stars)


This is a direct sequel to "Sagrada Reset Part 1". It was released only two months later, which gives the impression that the two parts were originally made as a single film, but the four hour running time was deemed too long. In the film's chronology, the second film starts six days after the end of the first film.

In the first film Soma was brought back to life after her suicide was undone by her time travelling friends. That was two years previously. Ever since then she's been hiding at Haruki's house. She doesn't want anyone except for her closest friends to know she's alive, because it's important to her that events unfold the same way as they did when she was dead. Now it's time to reveal herself as the Second Priestess.

I didn't mention in my review of the last film that there's an organisation called the Bureau which watches over the people in the town with abilities. Supposedly the Bureau has been created to prevent misuse of the powers, but the Bureau's leader Urachi actually wants to remove everyone's powers and make the town normal again. I apologise, I couldn't figure out why he wants to do this. The films are too complex for me to understand everything after a single viewing. I can't help feeling that things have been cut from the comics that would have explained everything.

Soma's intention, and the reason she committed suicide, was to prevent the special powers in the town from being removed.

There was a character in the first film, Kagaya, that I considered so insignificant that I didn't mention him. He's Urachi's personal assistant, responsible for opening and shutting doors and carrying Urachi's diary. That doesn't sound like much, does it? Whatever Kagaya closes stays locked, and nothing can open it. In the second film it's explained that this is a time lock; any door he shuts is frozen in time. The second film shows that he can even freeze people in time.

51 years ago there were only three people in the town with powers; a married couple and their piano teacher. The woman could foresee the future, and the man could make the town a place where people would have powers, but only for a brief time. The man had an unspecified illness, and he would die within a year. His wife knew that if the townspeople had powers there would be a healer able to cure him. Shortly after the powers appeared in the town, they had a son: Urachi. When he was eight years old he asked his friend Kagaya to freeze them in time so that the powers in the town wouldn't disappear. I still don't understand why. Ever since then, for more than 40 years, they've been kept as prisoners. But now Urachi wants to free them.

My head hurts. The story is fascinating, but I just don't get it. As far as I can tell, the comics aren't available in English, but the animated mini-series based on the comics keeps close to the stories. Maybe I can buy them. I'll consider it.