Showing posts with label Bill Skarsgard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill Skarsgard. Show all posts

Wednesday, 29 April 2026

John Wick 4 (5 Stars)


"John Wick Chapter 4" feels like the moment the series finally confronts the weight of its own mythology; not by expanding it further, but by testing whether it can be broken.

Across "John Wick" and "John Wick Chapter 2", the assassin world evolved from suggestion into structure; by "John Wick Chapter 3", it had hardened into something close to dogma, enforced by the High Table with near-religious authority. "Chapter 4" takes the next logical step; it treats that system not as an unchangeable fact, but as a construct that can be challenged, manipulated and, ultimately, outplayed.

What's striking is how the film reframes the mythology through ritual. The duel that forms the climax is not just a plot device; it's an ancient mechanism embedded within the rules of the High Table itself. After three films of escalation, the idea that everything can be resolved through something so formal, so archaic, almost feels like a loophole in the system. The mythology turns inward, revealing that its rigidity contains the seeds of its own undoing.

This is where John Wick changes most significantly. In earlier films, he was defined by his relationship to the rules; first as a legend outside them, then as a man bound by them, and finally as someone hunted by them. Here, he becomes a strategist within the mythology. He doesn't just fight the system; he learns how to use its language against itself. The coins, the markers, the codes of conduct; these are no longer constraints, but tools.

At the same time, "Chapter 4" subtly demystifies the High Table without ever fully exposing it. Its representatives, particularly the Marquis, suggest that power within this world is not purely ancient or divine, but also political, contingent and, crucially, vulnerable to ego. The mythology shifts from something monolithic to something inhabited by individuals who can make mistakes. That shift matters; it brings the series back from abstraction towards something human, even as it maintains its operatic scale.

Yet the film resists the temptation to over-explain. After the relative over-articulation of "John Wick Chapter 3", this instalment pares back exposition and lets ritual, geography and action carry the meaning. The journey through Osaka, Berlin and Paris suggests a world that is vast but coherent, bound by shared customs rather than explicit rules. The mythology regains some of its mystery, not by shrinking, but by becoming less verbal.


The question of whether John Wick can still be alive sits at the centre of this approach. On a literal level, the film presents his death with a degree of finality; the wounds, the exhaustion, the quiet acceptance. But the staging is deliberately ambiguous. We see a grave, but no body; we hear eulogies, but no confirmation. In a series so concerned with codes and appearances, that absence feels intentional.

More importantly, the mythology itself provides a possible answer. This is a world where identity is fluid, where names carry weight and can be shed or reclaimed. John Wick has already died once, retreating into legend before being drawn back. Within a system that runs on ritual and perception, death does not have to be purely physical; it can be symbolic, a way of exiting the game.

There is also the practical dimension. The High Table operates on recognition and enforcement; if it believes Wick is dead, its pursuit ends. In that sense, death becomes a strategic disappearance, a final exploitation of the rules he has spent four films learning to navigate. The mythology allows for that possibility because it values order over truth; what matters is not whether Wick lives, but whether the system believes he does not.

Still, the film walks a careful line. To insist too strongly on his survival would undercut the thematic resolution; Wick's arc has always been about escape, and death is the only absolute escape the series can offer without contradiction. By leaving the question open, "Chapter 4" preserves both possibilities; the man may be gone, but the legend, as always, endures.

In the end, "John Wick Chapter 4" doesn't just conclude the mythology; it reflects on it. What began as a whisper of a hidden world has become a fully realised system, then a prison, and finally something that can be transcended. Whether John Wick is alive or dead almost becomes secondary. The real question is whether he has finally stepped outside the mythology that defined him; and for the first time, the answer might be Yes.

Success Rate:  + 2.4

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Friday, 9 May 2025

Locked (4 Stars)


This is the fifth film in the Stuttgart Nights Festival.

Eddie Barrish isn't a bad man, but he does what he has to do to survive. His van breaks down, and he can't afford the repair costs, making it impossible for him to pick up his daughter from school. He steals a wallet and a few other small items, but it's not enough to pay the repair bill. Then he sees a luxury car standing in a car park. The door isn't locked, so he enters it to look for valuable items. He doesn't find anything, so he wants to leave, but the door is locked. A voice tells him that he's being punished for breaking into the car. Eddie is kept in the car for days on end while the voice taunts him.

The film is interesting, though I don't find it particularly feasible. The acting by Bill Skarsgard is excellent.

Saturday, 11 January 2025

Nosferatu [2024] (4½ Stars)


"Nosferatu" is a curious candidate for a remake. It was made in 1922 by the German director Friedrich Murnau. He wanted to make a film based on Bram Stoker's novel "Dracula", but he needed permission from the owner of the book's rights, Florence Balcombe, Stoker's widow. Since she was a racist who hated Germans, she refused to allow Murnau to make the film. Refusing to be put off, he made a film based on the story, changing the names of the characters and the locations of the events. For instance, Count Dracula was renamed Count Orlok. He thought he could get away with it, because his film was only planned to be shown in Germany. Balcombe found out and sued him. The court ordered that all copies should be destroyed, but several copies were rescued. In retrospect, "Nosferatu" (the 1922 version) is considered one of the greatest horror films ever made, while Florence Balcombe's name lives on in infamy.

In 1931 she allowed the book to be adapted by an American director. The film was called "Dracula", and the characters had the correct names. Since then more than 50 adaptations of the novel have been made, not counting the many films in which Dracula appears as a character. It's the most frequently adapted book ever. I own several of the films on disc. It's interesting to see which ones are more accurate and which ones leave out details.

But "Nosferatu" stands alone as an adaptation that deliberately changed the details. Why should something incorrect be copied? Nostalgia?

In 1979 Werner Herzog made a film called "Nosferatu the Vampyre", but I don't count it as a remake of the 1922 film. Not quite. He copied the visuals of the 1922 film, but he called the characters by their correct names.

The new film is a dedicated remake of the 1922 Nosferatu film. The wrong names are used throughout. The only reason I can think of for calling it "Nosferatu" is to set it aside from all the other films called "Dracula". The suspense is outstanding. Instead of slavishly following the 1922 film it adds several details from the book.

I'm happy to say that despite being in its second week the cinema was packed, about 90% full. I don't know how it's doing in other countries, but in Germany it's a big hit.

Tuesday, 30 July 2024

Barbarian (3 Stars)



This is a topical film. Tess arrives in Detroit to get a job making a documentary, and she books an AirBNB house in a run down area of Detroit. It was cheap. When she arrives late at night she finds that it was double booked. There's already a man staying in the house. At first she wants to leave and sleep in her car, but he seems pleasant enough. After a friendly chat and a bottle of wine they decide to share the house for the night. There are enough rooms for both of them.

The next day she goes into the cellar and finds strangely furnished rooms. Then she finds a door leading to another room below the cellar.

I feel like I'm missing something. The film was a box office hit, and the critics praise it. I don't understand why. I find the film very disjointed, jumping uncomfortably from one scene to another. Without giving spoilers, the explanation of the mystery doesn't make sense.

After its cinema run Netflix obtained exclusive rights, so it can't be bought on disc.

Success Rate:  + 9,4

Saturday, 20 April 2024

Boy Kills World (unrated)


This is the tenth film in the Stuttgart Nights Festival.

It's not often that I decide not to rate a film. There's a lot in "Boy Kills World" that annoys me, but there's also a lot that I like. If I'd just averaged the film out with a three star rating, it wouldn't have accurately expressed my feelings.

The whole film has a post-apocalyptic feeling to it. It takes place in an American city that's controlled by Hilda Vanderkloy. Once a year she holds a ceremony called the Culling, in which she publicly executes anyone who opposes her rule. Bill Skarsgard plays an unnamed young man whose family was killed in a culling ceremony. He's been training all his life so that he can kill Hilda.

What I like about the film is the incredible fight scenes. They're a joy to behold. What I don't like is the film's post-apocalyptic premise and the stupid look on Bill's face. It's annoying. There are other things that annoy me which I can't reveal without giving away spoilers. Nevertheless, I'll watch the film again when I get the chance. Maybe I'll rate it next time.

Thursday, 28 March 2024

John Wick 4 (5 Stars)


I watched this film two days ago, but I didn't write much because I was getting ready to go away for a weekend holiday. I took the Blu-ray with me because I wanted to watch it again. Now I'm not writing much because I'm away from home and have even less time. It's a terrific film, probably the best in the series. I say probably because it's difficult for me to make up my mind. Visually, it's in a class of its own. New York, Morocco, Osaka, Paris, Berlin. The action switches from country to country like a James Bond film.

Donnie Yen plays Caine, a blind assassin who's an old friend of John Wick. He enjoyed making the film so much that he's asked to return, either in a sequel or a spin-off. No decision has been made yet. I hope he's given a chance.

Success Rate:  + 2.4

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Tuesday, 26 March 2024

John Wick 4 (5 Stars)


Farewell to Charon, as played by Lance Reddick. In "John Wick 4" he's executed in a senseless act by the Marquis de Gramont. A short while after making the film the actor himself died of a heart disease.

This is truly a wonderful film. I don't know why I only gave it a four star rating when I saw it in the cinema last year. The only thing negative is that I'm annoyed by Scott Adkins' bloated appearance. I barely recognise him. All I can say is that I'm glad he was killed, because it means I don't have to see him in a future sequel.

Or do I? John Wick was killed, but the fifth film in the series has already been announced. You can't keep a good man down.

Success Rate:  + 2.4

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Thursday, 23 March 2023

John Wick 4 (4 Stars)


After the third John Wick film was made, the director Char Stahelski said there would be at least another two films. That was before the Corona pandemic. Everything was put on hold. The fourth film now seems to be the last film in the series. Keanu Reeves is getting older, and he can't carry on as an action hero forever.

At the end of the third film, John Wick's death was faked. That was the only way to free him from the domination of the High Table. He could have got away with this, but he makes the foolish decision to assassinate the unnamed leader of the High Table. When it's known that he's still alive, the High Table holds the Continental Hotel manager Winston responsible, and the hotel is destroyed.

This leads to an escalating spiral of revenge and counter-revenge.

As in the previous films, the lines between friend and foe are unclear. John has friends who're now compelled by duty to kill him.

It's an exciting action film, but the pacing is unusual. The film starts very fast. Then there's a long quiet passage in the middle. Then there's action again, but the final scene is calm, almost anti-climactic. I've rated it lower than the previous films, but I might change my mind after watching it again.

And there's an after-credits scene. Don't miss it!