This 1935 film is a sequel to
"Frankenstein", made four years earlier. It's considered a sequel, but it's more like an
afterthought. It's a film that contains many of the details from the novel
that were omitted in the original film.
Both the Monster and Henry Frankenstein seemingly died at the end of the first
film, but we see that they both survived. It's not clear how much time elapses
after the initial scenes, because Henry's father dies and he becomes the new
Baron Frankenstein.
"Bride of Frankenstein" differs from the original in several aspects. There's
more humour, especially when Dr. Pretorius displays his miniature creations.
There's also a prologue which emphasises that the film is
only a story. Is this to make it less horrific for the sensitive audiences of
the 1930's?
Dr. Pretorius is an original character who wasn't present in the novel,
but he plays a major role in the creation of the Bride. I don't see any reason
to add him to the film, except maybe for the sake of humour. It also shows
redemption for Henry Frankenstein. After the first film Henry wanted to give
up creating life; he wanted to give up trying to be God's equal. Dr. Pretorius
is the new villain. First he uses friendly persuasion to make Henry
create new life, and when that doesn't work he blackmails him by taking his
wife hostage.
Success Rate: + 3.0
Order from Amazon.com | |
Order from Amazon.co.uk | |
Order from Amazon.de |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Tick the box "Notify me" to receive notification of replies.