Monday, 13 January 2025

Shadow of the Vampire (5 Stars)


After watching "Nosferatu" on Saturday I felt inclined to rewatch the 1922 version of the film for comparison. I changed my mind and picked up "Shadow of the Vampire" instead. When's the last time I watched it? It was before I started writing my blog, so I have no exact date. I remember seeing it in the cinema in 2001, at a time when I rarely visited the cinema. It was one of the first films I bought on DVD, probably in 2003. I know I watched it a few times, but it was long, long ago. For this reason it was a good idea to choose it today.

The film follows F. W. Murnau and his filming of "Nosferatu" in 1922. Rather than tell the true story as a biopic, it tells a fantasy version of the story. Max Schreck, the man who was to play Count Orlok, wasn't an actor; he was a real vampire. After discovering him, Murnau asked him to appear in his film in exchange for being given the German actress Greta Schröder as his bride.

All went well on the film set, until Schreck got hungry and started to eat other members of the cast and crew. Murnau fights to keep Schreck's true identity a secret.

From my description the film might sound like a comedy, but it's played seriously. Willem Dafoe is genuinely scary as Max Schreck the vampire. It's tragic that this magnificent film has been forgotten with the passing of time. Despite its critical success, it's no longer available for purchase except for a Spanish Blu-ray. It has the original English version.

Success Rate:  - 0.6

Saturday, 11 January 2025

Nosferatu [2024] (4½ Stars)


"Nosferatu" is a curious candidate for a remake. It was made in 1922 by the German director Friedrich Murnau. He wanted to make a film based on Bram Stoker's novel "Dracula", but he needed permission from the owner of the book's rights, Florence Balcombe, Stoker's widow. Since she was a racist who hated Germans, she refused to allow Murnau to make the film. Refusing to be put off, he made a film based on the story, changing the names of the characters and the locations of the events. For instance, Count Dracula was renamed Count Orlok. He thought he could get away with it, because his film was only planned to be shown in Germany. Balcombe found out and sued him. The court ordered that all copies should be destroyed, but several copies were rescued. In retrospect, "Nosferatu" (the 1922 version) is considered one of the greatest horror films ever made, while Florence Balcombe's name lives on in infamy.

In 1931 she allowed the book to be adapted by an American director. The film was called "Dracula", and the characters had the correct names. Since then more than 50 adaptations of the novel have been made, not counting the many films in which Dracula appears as a character. It's the most frequently adapted book ever. I own several of the films on disc. It's interesting to see which ones are more accurate and which ones leave out details.

But "Nosferatu" stands alone as an adaptation that deliberately changed the details. Why should something incorrect be copied? Nostalgia?

In 1979 Werner Herzog made a film called "Nosferatu the Vampyre", but I don't count it as a remake of the 1922 film. Not quite. He copied the visuals of the 1922 film, but he called the characters by their correct names.

The new film is a dedicated remake of the 1922 Nosferatu film. The wrong names are used throughout. The only reason I can think of for calling it "Nosferatu" is to set it aside from all the other films called "Dracula". The suspense is outstanding. Instead of slavishly following the 1922 film it adds several details from the book.

I'm happy to say that despite being in its second week the cinema was packed, about 90% full. I don't know how it's doing in other countries, but in Germany it's a big hit.

Friday, 10 January 2025

SE7EN (4 Stars)


This is the January selection for the "Best Of Cinema" series. Usually the film is shown on the first Tuesday of the month, but it's been shifted to Friday this week for reasons unknown to me.

It's a film I've never seen before. I admit that I was put off by the film's title. It's pronounced seven, but it's written with a 7 instead of the V. Some people might think it's cool; I think it's stupid. The only advantage of misspelling the title is that it won't be confused with the Andy Sidaris film called "Seven".

"Se7en" – I hate typing that word! – was filmed in Los Angeles, but according to reviews it takes place in an unnamed fictional city. Why not just call it Los Angeles? The action takes place in grubby little streets, carefully avoiding any well known landmarks. Morgan Freeman plays William Somerset, a detective seven days before his retirement. He's joined by David Mills, a young, impulsive detective who's been transferred from a smaller city. Somerset wants to get away from violent crime, Mills is looking for it. They spend Somerset's last week working together.

There are a series of seemingly unrelated deaths. The victims have no connection to one another and come from all walks of life. At the scene of the first death the word "gluttony" is written on the wall. At the scene of the second death the word "greed" is written on the floor. The detectives surmise that they're the first two victims of a serial killer who's basing his murders on the seven deadly sins.

The killer might seem mad, but he's a very calm, religiously motivated man. He doesn't care if he's captured, as long as he can carry out his seven murders first. He wants to send the world a message that committing any of the seven deadly sins is a greater sin than traditional crimes and should be punished accordingly.

It's a good film, but is it best of cinema? That's a matter of taste. It won't ever enter my top films list.

Success Rate:  + 7.9

Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Sunday, 5 January 2025

Better Man (4½ Stars)


Have you ever had one of those days when you feel you're going to see the wrong film? When I arrived at the cinema today it was packed. The queue was so long that it stretched out of the foyer and into the entrance area. That always warms my heart. I'm happy to see cinemas doing well. Cinema attendances took ages to recover after the Corona pandemic.

But what were the people going to see? At the door where the tickets were checked, almost everyone headed straight on to watch "Nosferatu" on the largest screen downstairs. I was one of a few who went up the stairs to watch "Better Man". In fact, the theatre upstairs was almost empty. There couldn't have been more than twenty of us watching "Better Man". That's understandable. Robbie Williams was a big star in Britain, but only moderately popular abroad. In America he was almost unknown.

Nevertheless, those of us who sat watching "Better Man" were greatly entertained.

It was moving for me to see Robbie's childhood in the streets of Stoke-on-Trent. It was an important city for me in my teenage years, and the scene of one of the most dramatic events of my life. It was the place where I attempted suicide when I was 18. It was something I'd been planning for weeks. I never talked about it to anyone. I always say that people who talk about suicide won't go through with it. It's just a cry for help. There's nothing wrong with that. People who want help shouldn't be ashamed of asking for it.

I took a train to Stoke-on-Trent in the morning. I was careful not to carry anything with me that would identify me. I went onto a hill overlooking the city and swallowed a packet of rat poison, washing it down with lemonade. It had a bitter taste, difficult to swallow. Then I sat watching boys playing football lower on the hill, until I grew tired. Eventually I lay down to sleep, happy in the knowledge that I would never wake up.

But I did wake up. I don't know how long I'd been sleeping. I didn't have a watch with me. The sun was still shining, but it was summer, so it could have been two hours later. I don't know. I didn't feel bad, so I went to the train station and travelled home.

In the evening I was watching television with my mother, as if nothing had happened. Then I developed stomach cramps, so I told her what I'd done. An ambulance came. In hospital my stomach was pumped. I was told that I was very lucky. Lucky? I considered myself unlucky. I was surrounded by people asking me why I'd done it. That was a nightmare. I never told anyone the truth, even when I spent six weeks in a lunatic asylum.

I'd attempted suicide because of my mother. Growing up we'd always been close. She wasn't just a mother, she was my best friend. That changed in my mid teens. She became addicted to alcohol. She was drunk every night when she came home, and it was impossible to talk to her. This broke my heart. I'd lost her. Death was the only way out.

But I survived. Things didn't get better with my mother, but I carried on. Two years later she left my father to live with another man. I felt like she was leaving me, not him. Ironically, she never moved in with the man. They rented a small apartment together, but he got cold feet at the last moment and didn't leave his wife. I still thought about suicide, but I didn't try it again. I was terrified that I'd fail again. The aftermath of a suicide attempt is awful.

One thing though. I never returned to Stoke-on-Trent. I had friends there, but I never visited them again. I've avoided it all my life. It was emotional to see the city today. It gave me a feeling of melancholy.

I could hardly bring myself to write a review. I've backdated this post to January 5th, the day I went to the cinema, but I'm writing it a week later. I needed time to overcome myself.

Friday, 3 January 2025

Mufasa: The Lion King (4 Stars)


This is the first time I've gone to the cinema with my grandson Oliver since October. That's a long time. Usually I try to go with him twice a month.

There are a lot of children's films being shown over the Christmas holidays, but he's been busy with other things. What my friends might not know is that the Christmas holidays last longer in Germany than in other countries. Most companies are closed from 23rd December to 6th January. The reason is that the 6th of January is also a national holiday, the Holy Three Kings day, usually called the Epihany in English. It's an important day in Germany, because the skeletons were buried in the Cologne Cathedral after being passed around for centuries.


The shrine is now on an elevated platform behind the altar, and it's become a place for pilgrims to visit. I find it strange. The three kings went to Bethlehem to worship Jesus. Today the kings themselves are worshipped by Catholics, at least in Germany. This isn't right. If the kings were alive today they'd tell us they don't want to be worshipped.

Now to the film. It serves as a prequel to the classic Disney film, "The Lion King". The story seems to repeat the plot. I found the film interesting, but what fascinated me the most was the beautiful imagery. I visit the zoo in Stuttgart frequently (in some months more than others), but the animals looked more beautiful in the film than anything I've seen in the zoo.

Oliver greatly enjoyed the film. That's the most important thing. I need to encourage him to watch the glorious 1994 animated film.

Thursday, 2 January 2025

Ma (4½ Stars)


Octavia Spencer is one of my favourite actresses. I've forgotten in which film I first noticed her, but it was a long time ago. Was it "Spider-Man"? Maybe. She only has a small role, but she's very noticeable. I can't be sure. She started her career with minor roles in a few films, such as "Being John Malkovich" and "Never been kissed". I think I noticed her for her beauty first, and her acting talent later, in her leading roles in "Hidden Figures" and "The Shack".

"Ma" is a different role for her. Usually she plays a good girl, but in "Ma" she's all evil. Admittedly, there's a back story which tells us how she turned bad. She was bullied as an ugly duckling in school, and now that she's a woman she wants revenge. We can sympathise with her, even though her actions horrify us.

It's a role that she plays credibly. She's a magnificent actress.

Success Rate:  + 10.2

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Wednesday, 1 January 2025

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3 (4 Stars)


I finally got round to buying "Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3" on Blu-ray, after almost two years. I've been waiting for the price to drop, but it didn't, so I weakened and paid 9.99 Euros for it. Usually I don't like to pay more than eight Euros for a film. "Wakanda Forever" is even more expensive, currently 12.50 Euros. It wasn't even reduced in Amazon's Black Friday sale. I'll be patient.

I'll repeat what I wrote in my last review. It's a good science fiction film, but it's a poor Marvel adaptation. Whoever the five characters in the picture may be, they're not the same people that we know in the comics. Maybe Groot comes close, but not the others.


The portrayal of Warlock makes me sad. In the comics he was a noble warrior, the only person that Thanos feared, but he's just a clumsy idiot in the film. Mantis is even worse. In the comics she's deeply spiritual, despite having worked as a prostitute in Vietnam. In the films she's stupid. Not naively stupid, just stupid.

I have a suggestion. Let's reboot the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Let's start again from the beginning. New actors, and let's have stories that closely follow what was written in the comics, especially those written by Stan Lee and Roy Thomas. And let's get the costumes right. How many films did we need before Wolverine finally put on his yellow spandex? I just counted. It took him ten films. In "Deadpool & Wolverine" he finally looks right.

I need to give this film yet another chance. The critics call it one of the better Marvel films. Maybe they're right. I need to make an effort to forget the comics when I watch it next time.

Success Rate:  + 1.4

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de