Blogging is all about momentum. For years I've been used to my daily rhythm of
watching a film every day, then writing about it.
Watch. Write. Sleep. Repeat.
What I'm trying to say is that after taking a short break from blogging it's difficult
to regain my momentum.
I took a break last week to catch up on watching TV series. I watched the third
season of "Vikings". At first I only wanted to watch a couple of episodes, but
it's so brilliant that I couldn't stop. The murder of the monk Athelstan by
Floki was a shock. For me, Athelstan was the series' most fascinating
character. A man caught between two religions. As he said at the beginning of
the third season, "I love Jesus, but I've chosen Odin". The whole
subject of the two religions, along with the strong character development, is
what makes "Vikings" so appealing. The Vikings and the English both consider
their respective religions to be the true religion, and there's no way for the
two to meet, except for Athelstan. His murder has destroyed the only bridge
between the two religions.
Today, most people only know the Norse religion – what's it called
anyway? Odinism? – from the Marvel films. Odin is Anthony Hopkins with
an eye patch and Thor is Chris Hemsworth strutting about arrogantly. I read
the Norse myths as a young teenager. I read them as stories, not taking
account of the religious aspects.
Maybe I should write more about "Vikings" at a later date. Maybe when I get to
the fourth season. I'm getting off topic now. I ought to be writing about
"Jurassic Park". Did you forget?
Oops! Wrong dinosaur! I had this unused screenshot from
"Bikini Jones" that I needed to share with you.
This is a dinosaur from "Jurassic Park". The difference in quality might not
be apparent from the two screenshots. To fully appreciate the superiority of
the computer animation, you have to see the dinosaurs moving. When the film
was made in 1993, "Jurassic Park" had the most realistic dinosaurs ever.
However, due to the restrictions in computer speed, they were used
sparingly.
Steven Spielberg might not be my favourite director, but I respect him as the
greatest living director. He knows how to make films, and a Film Studies
course could be wrapped around his films without mentioning any other
director. In the series
"Dawson's Creek"
the title character, Dawson Leery, was obsessed with Steven Spielberg. He made
frequent references to his films throughout the series, and his dream was to
become a director like Spielberg. His films all include strong character
development. There's a Spielberg Style, as I like to call it. His films
start off with an action scene to get the audience in the mood. Then the films
slow down, introducing the main characters, one by one. After that there's a
slow build up to the big action scenes. That's the pattern he follows in
"Jurassic Park". That's the pattern he followed in
"Jaws".
They're two excellent films, made 20 years apart, each using the best that the
technology of the day had to offer.
The characters in the film are stereotypes. I don't say that as a criticism.
By using standard stereotypes, the audience can relate to them. We know who
they are and what makes them tick, even before we see the details of their
characters. Dr. Alan Grant is a stuffy archaeologist. He would rather
sit alone digging than communicate with others, and he avoids children as much
as he can. Dr. John Hammond is the carefree millionaire. Dr. Ellie
Sattler is a friendly, sociable palaeobotanist who assists Dr. Grant in his
work. (For those of you who, like me, don't know what a palaeobotanist is, it's
someone who studies old fossilised plants).
Then there are the kids. Dr. Hammond's grandchildren are present in the
dinosaur park, adding human interest. Everyone can relate to young children.
If anyone thinks this is the best film ever made, I won't argue with you. It's
a candidate for the top spot. I have difficulty deciding which is better,
"Jurassic Park" or its sequel,
"Lost World", which I intend to watch tomorrow. "Lost World" has superior graphics, due
to the rapid advances in computer technology in the 1990's, but "Jurassic
Park" has a better story. Watching them back to back will help me judge them
better.
Success Rate: + 14.4
Order from Amazon.com | |
Order from Amazon.co.uk | |
Order from Amazon.de |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Tick the box "Notify me" to receive notification of replies.