This is the latest film in the
Best Of Cinema
series. It's unique among the 24 films already shown or announced so far, as
the only film that's less than 20 years old. Is that a mistake? Maybe it is,
but it's a welcome mistake. It's a brilliant film, and it's already included
in
my top 100 film list. It's in 94th place at the moment, but I think it should be higher. I'll
think it over next time I review my list.
Tonight I spoke with a few people in the cinema, and they'd all seen the film before.
I've watched it four times since I started my blog, probably twice before. I
wish I'd started my blog in 2003 when I first became a serious film fan. This
is the first time I've seen it on the big screen.
One thing I didn't mention in my previous reviews is my shock at French
executions in the 18th Century. Most countries used to hang criminals, and I
thought that France used the guillotine, but not in this film. Is it
historically accurate? The person is bound to a pillar and the executioner
hits him with a hammer in eight places on his arms and legs, breaking his
bones, after which he's left to die. Is it really necessary that the person
should die in such pain, whatever he's done?
I expect to be writing less, if at all, for the next two weeks, because I'm
going on holiday: one week in Borkum and one week in Karlsbad, on the northern
tip of the Black Forest. I'll be looking after my grandchildren, so I doubt
I'll have much time to write.
Success Rate: + 0.3
Order from Amazon.co.uk | |
Order from Amazon.de |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Tick the box "Notify me" to receive notification of replies.