When I heard that Guillermo del Toro was planning to film "Frankenstein", my
immediate thought was "Why? Hasn't it been done so often before?"
It's true. Mary Shelley's famous novel has been adapted for cinema so often
over the years, more or less accurately. The best known adaptations were made
by
Universal Studios in 1931, Hammer Horror in 1957 and
the Hollywood version in 1994. All three have their charm, but the 1994 version is the most accurate in
comparison with Mary Shelley's novel.
I don't want to include spoilers in this review, but I assume that my readers
have seen the three versions named above and many have also read the novel.
The version I watched today includes the story's outer frame that was omitted
in the first two versions. We see Victor Frankenstein and his creature on the
ice heading towards the North Pole. Then the rest of the story is told in two
parts: Victor's life up to the creation of the creature, and the creature's
life. The first half is greatly changed from the novel, making it less
accurate than the 1994 version, but it's so emotionally moving that it doesn't
matter. The second half, the creature's life, keeps close to the novel, even
more accurately than the 1994 version.
Guillermo del Toro has created a masterpiece. It's a horror film for people
who don't like horror films.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Tick the box "Notify me" to receive notification of replies.