Scream 2 (5 Stars)

Scream 2 – The Horror Sequel that Watches Itself Watching You

When Wes Craven released Scream in 1996, it revived the slasher genre by dissecting it – both loving and mocking its clichés. Its sequel, Scream 2, takes that self-reflexive impulse and amplifies it, becoming not only a horror film about horror films, but a horror sequel about the inevitability and predictability of sequels. It's a movie obsessed with its own status as cinema – what it means to depict violence, to consume it and to perform it again and again under the guise of entertainment.

The Meta of the Meta: Watching the Movie Within the Movie

The opening scene of Scream 2 is one of the most audacious metafilm gestures in mainstream horror. Set in a packed cinema showing Stab – a film based on the murders from the first Scream – we are thrust into a spectacle of spectatorship. The audience within the film, masked and gleeful, mirrors the audience watching Scream 2 in real life. Craven transforms the theatre into a mirror maze: viewers watching viewers watching murder as entertainment.

The scene literalises horror's self-awareness while critiquing its consumption. The boundaries between fiction and reality collapse in real time. When Jada Pinkett's character, Maureen Evans, is stabbed to death amid cheering crowds who think it's part of the show, Craven forces us to confront our complicity as horror audiences – our appetite for stylized death and our comfort with seeing certain bodies die first.

Race and the Periphery of the Frame

That opening sequence also foregrounds Scream 2's uneasy engagement with race. The choice to feature two black characters (Jada Pinkett and Omar Epps) in the prologue is not incidental – it's a deliberate metatextual gesture. Their dialogue critiques the horror genre's historical whiteness: Maureen complains that "Black people always get killed first", voicing a long-standing fan frustration and cultural truth about slasher films.

But Craven's choice is double-edged. By having them die in the very next moments, the film acknowledges that critique yet also reproduces it. It's both a self-aware nod and a failure of imagination – a knowing wink that doesn't save the characters from the same fate. This recursive irony is precisely what defines Scream 2's relationship to race: it sees the problem clearly but remains unable (or unwilling) to step outside the structure it mocks.

Beyond the opening, the film reverts to a predominantly white cast, situating its story in a college environment coded as upper-middle-class and implicitly white. The only black characters who speak meaningfully are relegated to brief, marginal roles. Scream 2 thus reflects a broader pattern of 1990's Hollywood diversity: inclusion through commentary, not transformation.

In other words, Scream 2 knows it's participating in exclusion, and calls attention to that fact, but still participates.

The Meta Frame as Social Commentary

What keeps Scream 2 so compelling, however, is that its metafilm sensibility extends beyond just genre rules; it becomes a mode of cultural reflection. The film within the film (Stab) mirrors how the media capitalises on real violence, transforming trauma into spectacle. For Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell), the survivor of the original film, the existence of Stab turns her pain into entertainment. She's forced to watch her own trauma fictionalised and sold – a meta-commentary on how real-life suffering, especially women's suffering, is endlessly recycled for cultural consumption.

This idea connects back to the racial dynamic of the opening: both Maureen and Sidney are victims of a system that aestheticises violence differently depending on who's watching. The Stab audience cheers Maureen's death; the media profits from Sidney's survival. Both are products in the machinery of spectacle.

Conclusion: Self-Aware but Not Self-Transcendent

Scream 2 remains one of the sharpest horror sequels ever made precisely because it knows it cannot escape its own reflection. It's trapped in the feedback loop of representation: critiquing what it reproduces, reproducing what it critiques. Its metafilm brilliance lies in this tension: the recognition that awareness alone doesn't equate to change.

When Jada Pinkett's Maureen dies screaming in a theatre full of spectators who mistake it for performance, Scream 2 asks us a haunting question: if horror knows it's problematic, and we know that it knows, why do we keep watching?

Success Rate:  + 5.2

	Order from Amazon.com
	Order from Amazon.co.uk