I was just asked what's happened to my reports of the Brian Farmer murder trial. Yesterday I was asked to cease posting daily trial reports on my blog. The reason is that what I post might influence the jury, leading
to the case being dismissed on a technicality. Since this was put to me
as a polite request I immediately agreed to comply, instead of getting
involved in a lengthy discussion about my blog. I do, however, consider
my posts harmless, and I shall present my reasons here.
First
of all, the jury has been instructed not to follow the court case by
reading about it in newspapers or online. There is, of course, the
danger that a juror might be a passionate film fan and accidentally
stumble on my posts on this blog. After all, this is a film blog, not
the place he would normally expect to find trial reports. I have already
taken this into account. My trial reports only include things said in
front of the jury. I have omitted the discussions held between the judge
and the lawyers while the jury is out of the room. I have also been
careful not to claim any of the defendants are guilty or innocent,
merely reporting what they say and what the five lawyers in the case say
about them. What I mean is, if a lawyer says that defendant X is lying I
make it clear that it's the lawyer's opinion, rather than just saying
"X was obviously lying".
Obviously I am not a
professional court reporter. I have never received training as a
journalist. Nevertheless, asking me to cease the reports shows that my
skills are being underestimated. I know what to write and what not to
write. I shall continue with my daily reports, but I shall no longer
make them available to the general public. I shall make
the reports public when the trial is over. I apologise to my regular readers for any inconvenience. This is a purely English problem. In America murder trials are broadcast live on the Internet, then posted to YouTube at the end of the day.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Tick the box "Notify me" to receive notification of replies.