Is this a depressing film or an uplifting film? It depends on the way you look
at it. It's supposed to be uplifting, but for me the depressing aspects
overweigh.
70-year-old Marion Harris, pictured above, is happy and loves life. Even
though she's wheelchair-bound and terminally ill with cancer, she regularly
visits her local community centre for choir practise. Her husband Arthur doesn't get
it. He thinks she should stay at home and relax instead of exerting herself.
The word cancer is never used in the film, even though it's obvious what's
meant. It's a terrible word that people are afraid to use.
Arthur loves his wife, there's no doubt about it, but he's a grumpy old man.
Because of her disability he has to bring her to the community centre, but he
doesn't go in. He stands outside by himself smoking. He listens to the songs
through the window, but he doesn't approve. They're too modern for him.
Halfway through the film Marion dies. Arthur becomes even more of a recluse
than he was before. Then he starts to think about Marion's singing. He goes to
the community centre and listens through the window, even though he has no
reason to be there. Elizabeth, the choir's teacher, encourages him to start
singing. At first she gives him private lessons, and then he joins the choir.
I think you can see the film's dichotomy. A man finds new hope through singing
after the death of his wife. That's uplifting. But she's dead. The film even shows her dying. I
have difficulty watching films about cancer.
In the film's favour, it has outstanding performances by the main actors.
Gemma Arterton is my favourite actress among all actresses who're
active today. Christopher Eccleston plays his part excellently as Arthur's
son. But Terence Stamp steals the show as Arthur. It's amazing how well he
portrays a man with pent up emotions. He's playing a man who's trying to hide
his emotions, but Arthur isn't 100% successful. Terence Stamp lets the
emotions seep through with an occasional flash of his eyes.
For the sake of realism, a complete amateur choir was used in the film. They
already knew one another, so they had natural chemistry. There were just a
couple of actors inserted into the choir for the speaking roles. As far as the
singing was concerned, they were acting naturally and doing what they did
best.
I can imagine that many of my friends will like this film. Maybe you can
concentrate on the film's uplifting aspects. I can't.
Success Rate: + 7.2
Order from Amazon.com | |
Order from Amazon.co.uk | |
Order from Amazon.de |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Tick the box "Notify me" to receive notification of replies.