Saturday, 3 November 2018

Bohemian Rhapsody (4½ Stars)


This is a film that was plagued with problems ever since its production began in 2010. At the beginning Sacha Baron Cohen was chosen to play Freddie Mercury – in my opinion an excellent choice – but he left the project in 2013 over differences with the script. For years it wasn't clear whether the film would be about Queen or about Freddie Mercury. In 2013 Brian May, Queen's lead guitarist, was still pushing for the film to continue after Freddie's death by telling the story of Queen's current success. I know that hardcore Queen fans will argue with me about this, but in my opinion Queen ran out of steam after Freddie Mercury's death. They're still touring, and I'm sure their concerts are highly enjoyable, but they haven't recorded an album for over 20 years. If Freddie were still with them today he'd be writing songs and there would be album after album.

That wasn't to be. The film I saw today was clearly about Freddie Mercury the man, not Queen the group. That's the film Sacha Baron Cohen wanted, and if he hadn't been so impatient he could have been in it. However, Rami Malek is an excellent replacement. I was amazed by his singing, although I read this evening that Freddie Mercury's original vocals were used in most of the songs. That's understandable. Where could they have found an actor with a four octave vocal range? An actor who looks like Freddie Mercury as well?

As far as the appearance goes, Rami Malek is a good choice. He has the right skin colour and stature, and whatever else was missing could be added with the aid of make up and prosthetic teeth. Rami learnt (supposedly after months of practise) how to walk like Freddie Mercury, a mixture of arrogant swagger and androgynous posing.

I didn't read reviews of the film before I went to the cinema today, but I checked what others have written as soon as I got home tonight. There seems to be a general consensus among the critics: they love Rami Malek's performance as Freddie Mercury and they love the songs, but they criticise the historical inaccuracies. I've read about what was "wrong" in the film, but I shan't repeat it here. Read the other reviews for yourself. All I'll say is that I'm rather puzzled. I don't understand why it was necessary to bend the truth to make a better film. Brian May, as executive producer, could have insisted on the truth being told.


The film begins with Freddie Mercury as a baggage handler at Heathrow Airport in 1970. He was born in Zanzibar, Tanzania's largest island. His traditional parents, especially his father, wanted him to make something good of himself. They didn't understand when he gave up his career to make music. Nevertheless, after teaming up with Brian May and Roger Taylor (John Deacon came later) his group went from success to success, and they finally accepted him.

I grew up with Queen. The first song I heard of theirs was "Seven Seas of Rhye" in 1974. I thought it was quite good, but not good enough to make me rush out and buy it. It was their third single; I missed the first two. I associated them with the glam rock movement. That was Freddie Mercury's image. Then they released "Killer Queen" later in the same year, and my reaction was "Wow! This is really good!" For me it wasn't just about Freddie Mercury's powerful vocals, I also liked the appropriately light guitar licks of Brian May. Then came "Bohemian Rhapsody".

I didn't realise until I watched the film today how badly this operatic single was received by the music press at the time. In the film the screen is plastered with quotes from magazines like Melody Maker saying how bad it was. I used to read Melody Maker regularly as a teenager, but I must have missed that article. All I remember is the effect it had on me and the people around me. When it was played on the radio people stopped to listen. It immediately topped the charts in England and most European countries. It didn't reach number one in America, but that's because the American charts weren't based on sales, they were based on the number of airplays on key radio stations. (That's an intrinsically corrupt way of fixing the charts, but that's a subject for another day).

"Bohemian Rhapsody" was Queen's biggest hit, but it didn't mean the band became any less popular. I followed their music until 1986, when they released the album "A Kind of Magic". There was an amusing story behind it. The band was asked by the director of the film "Highlander" to write a title song for the film. The band went away, and a few months later they returned with nine songs, a whole album. They were so enthusiastic about the story behind the film that they couldn't stop writing. Six of the songs were used in the film. One of the songs, "Who wants to love forever", is my personal favourite song by Queen.


I knew the music, but I didn't know what was going on behind the scenes. In the pre-Internet days I had to rely on rumours and random articles in music magazines. That's where the film steps in to assist me with its almost-true narrative. Freddie was in love with a girl called Mary Austin. They got engaged but never married, though they lived together for a few years. At the same time he began to have sexual feelings towards other men. Eventually he confessed to Mary that he was bisexual, but she rejected this and said, "You're not bisexual, you're gay". They split up, but she lived next door to him. He considered her the only love of his life, even though he preferred sexual relationships with men.

This is where Freddie's life started spinning out of control. By spending time with men he didn't love it was inevitable that he would be surrounded by men who didn't love him. They used him, and they separated him from the band members of Queen. Queen was his family, just as much as Mary was his family, and he distanced himself from them. It took him a few years to come to his senses, and he reunited for them for the Live Aid spectacular in 1985. The film gives the impression that this was the end of his time with Queen, but he actually made another three albums with them before his death.

Oops! I said I wouldn't name any of the inaccuracies in the story. Sorry!

I enjoyed the film greatly. I loved the music, I was impressed by Rami Malek's performance, and I was told enough about Freddie Mercury's personal life to satisfy my curiosity. I would probably have given the film a five star rating if it had been absolutely true. Nevertheless, I can recommend it to anyone, whether they're Queen fans or not. Maybe the film will make a fan of you.

Marvel Years 05.05 - May 1965


The Merry Marvel Marching Society advertises on the cover of some but not all of this month's comics.


Amazing Spider-Man #24

Title: Spider-Man goes mad

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Steve Ditko

Villain: Mysterio

Regulars: Aunt May, J. Jonah Jameson, Betty Brant, Frederick Foswell, Flash Thompson, Liz Allan


Mysterio poses as a psychiatrist and tries to persuade Spider-Man that he's going mad.

There's an advertisement for the MMMS on the cover.

The Crazy Credits tell us that Sam Rosen provides quantity, not quality.


But look at what Sam does here. He can even write upside down!




Fantastic Four #38

Title: Defeated by the Frightful Four

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Jack Kirby

Villain: Frightful Four (Wizard, Trapster, Sandman, Medusa)


Paste-Pot Pete has grown tired of his ridiculous name, so he now calls himself the Trapster.

The Frightful Four kidnap Susan Storm. Then they lure the remaining members of the Fantastic Four to a remote atoll on which there's a Q-Bomb. I have no idea what that is, but it sounds dangerous. The Frightful Four fly away before the bomb explodes. The Fantastic Four are protected from the blast by Susan Storm's invisible shield, but they're left unconscious, barely alive.


The Thing has the chance to shout his battle cry: It's clobbering time.

There's an advertisement for the MMMS on the cover.




X-Men #11

Title: The Triumph of Magneto

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Jack Kirby

X-Men: Cyclops, Angel, Beast, Iceman, Marvel Girl

Villain: Magneto, Toad, Mastermind, Quicksilver, Scarlet Witch

Regulars: Professor X

Guests: Stranger


Cerebro detects a very powerful mutant in New York. In a way, it's a false alarm. The person detected isn't a mutant, he's a very powerful being from another planet. He calls himself a stranger, which becomes his name in future stories.

Magneto tries to recruit the Stranger for his Brotherhood of Evil Mutants, but he refuses to join them. He easily defeats them in battle. The Stranger immobilises Mastermind by turning him to stone. Then he takes Magneto and Toad back with him to his home planet. Only Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch are left behind, and they swear to give up evil. They say that they want to retire to Eastern Europe, but this doesn't last long, as we see in this month's Avengers #16.

The Crazy Credits tell us that everything about this issue is exceptional, even Artie Simek's lettering.




The Avengers #16

Title: The Old Order Changeth

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Jack Kirby

Avengers: Captain America, Thor, Iron Man, Giant-Man, Wasp, Hawkeye, Quicksilver, Scarlet Witch

Villain: Masters of Evil (Enchantress, Executioner, Black Knight, Melter)
        Kang (cameo), Immortus (cameo), Mole Man (cameo), Black Widow (flashback)

Regulars: Rick Jones, Jarvis

Guests: Happy Hogan, Sub-Mariner


This is a landmark issue. It features a new line-up of the Avengers. The original group had very powerful members, as far as strength goes. The new team has weaker members who have to rely on their skill.

First the battle against the Masters of Evil is wrapped up. In the last issue Baron Zemo died in his battle against Captain America in South America. The other Avengers were left facing the Enchantress, the Executioner, Black Knight and the Melter in New York City. Thor creates a dimensional warp with his hammer to take them somewhere where there are no bystanders who might get hurt. The Enchantress and the Executioner escape just in time, but Black Knight and the Melter are transported to another dimension where they're quickly defeated.

That's the first four pages. The remaining 16 pages tell the comic's most important story.

Thor has to leave to face the Trial of the Gods. I assume that Journey into Mystery #114 and #115 took place between page four and page six of this comic.

Iron Man, Giant-Man and the Wasp decide to take a leave of absence from the Avengers.

Hawkeye, who is no longer associated with the Black Widow, joins the Avengers.

Quicksilver and the Scarlet Witch retired to Eastern Europe in X-Men #11, but it didn't last long. They return to America to join the Avengers.

Sub-Mariner is invited to join the Avengers, but he turns the offer down.

One strange thing is the way the Avengers' enemies are following the news of the membership changes. I can understand Mole-Man, the Enchantress and the Executioner sitting glued to their television sets, but why is Kang watching from the future? He lives in the 40th Century, so he ought to have known about all the changes in the Avengers from reading history books, long before he met them. The same applies to Immortus.


I can't help feeling that Stan Lee wants to say something bad about Artie Simek in the Crazy Credits, but it doesn't end up too bad. Lettering ought to be delicate. We need to be able to read the comics.




Tales to Astonish #67

Title: The Mystery of the Hidden Man and his Rays of Doom

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Bob Powell

Villain: aliens


An alien from another planet comes to Earth, attempting to steal the knowledge and abilities of human beings. To do this he uses a green ray.

There's an advertisement for the MMMS on the cove

According to the Crazy Credits Stan Lee, Bob Powell and Chic Stone are swinging, but Artie Simek is a square. Who cares as long as he does his work?




Title: Where strides the Behemoth

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Steve Ditko

Villain: Communists, bandits

Regulars: General Ross, Major Talbot

The Hulk is still behind the Iron Curtain in an unnamed country, probably Russia. He flees towards Mongolia, where he turns back into Bruce Banner. He's captured by bandits who hold him for ransom. Major Talbot travels to Mongolia to pay the ransom.


This is one of the more curious Crazy Credits boxes. "Stan Lee created the Hulk". That's true.

"Steve Ditko adopted the Hulk". That's also true, although he's scheduled to leave the comic next issue. Maybe we should say that he fostered the Hulk.

"Frank Ray fears the Hulk". That's probably true. Who wouldn't?

"Artie Simek looks like the Hulk". I doubt it. If he really looked like the Hulk Stan Lee would have more respect for him.




Journey into Mystery #116

Title: The Trial of the Gods

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Jack Kirby

Villain: Loki, Enchantress, Executioner

Regulars: Odin, Balder, Jane Foster

Guests: Avengers (Captain America, Iron Man, Giant-Man, Wasp), Rick Jones
        Frightful Four (Wizard, Trapster, Sandman, Medusa), Daredevil


The Trial of the Gods begins. Just like the Vikings' justice system, it's trial by combat. Thor and Loki are sent to the savage world of Skornheim, where they have to fight against one another and against the elements. Whichever one of them returns to Asgard first has proven that he is innocent of the charge of lying to Odin. I fail to see the logic in that.

To distract Thor, Loki sends the Enchantress and the Executioner to threaten Jane Foster, chasing her through the streets of New York. Balder travels to Earth to protect her.

There are continuity errors in this story on page 12. Look at the following pictures.


During the Trial of the Gods all of the other members of the Avengers are having a meeting.


But in Avengers #16, page five, the Avengers had a meeting just after Thor left for the Trial of the Gods. Captain America is missing because he hasn't returned from fighting with Baron Zemo in South America. Is it possible that the Avengers had another meeting after Captain America returned?


No. Because when Captain America finally returned on page 17 the Avengers already had new members. Any meeting with Captain America would have included Hawkeye, Quicksilver and the Scarlet Witch.

The mistake is that Captain America and Rick Jones are drawn with the Avengers on page 12 of the Thor story. Jack Kirby blundered, and nobody else noticed his mistake.


But as always, if a mistake is made we can always blame the letterer. In the Crazy Credits Jack Kirby is declared impregnable. Artie Simek is the one who's called impossible. Poor Artie! How did he ever put up with the constant abuse in the Bullpen?




Title: The Challenge

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Jack Kirby

Gods: Thor, Loki

Thor and Loki have been sent on a diplomatic mission to King Hymir. Loki persuades Hymir to challenge Thor to a fight.

There's a mistake on the splash page. This time it's Stan Lee's fault. The text at the top reads "In Thor #63 we saw how Loki won himself an ally". There's no such comic as Thor #63. The story he's referring to was in Journey Into Mystery #115. Maybe if Stan Lee and Jack Kirby stopped picking on the letterers they would make less mistakes.




Tales of Suspense #65

Title: When Titans Clash

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Don Heck

Villain: Weasel Wills (a burglar)

Regulars: Pepper Potts, Happy Hogan


Anthony Stark goes on a business trip and leaves his attache case with his armour behind. A burglar steals the case and learns how to operate the Iron Man suit. He carries out many successful robberies until Stark returns and puts on his old armour to fight him.

There's an advertisement for the MMMS on the cover.

The Crazy Credits have another new word for me. I don't know what persnippy means, but I'm sure it's nothing good.




Title: The Red Skull Strikes

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Jack Kirby

Villain: Red Skull

This is the third story in a row that has been rewritten from Captain America Comics #1 (December 1940). Unlike the previous two stories, which closely followed the originals, this story has a few subtle plot changes.

The Red Skull is a Nazi saboteur who's working in America to weaken the American military.




Strange Tales #132

Title: The Sinister Space Trap

Writer: Larry Ivie
Artist: Bob Powell

Villain: Professor Jack (a scientist)

Regulars: Reed Richards, Susan Storm, Doris Evans


A scientist is suspected of sabotaging a new space program. Johnny Storm goes undercover as a young astronaut to see if the suspicions are true. When he's trapped in space the Thing has to come to his rescue.


The Thing yells his battle cry: It's clobbering time! Did you notice that he also says it on the cover?


Also on the cover is an advertisement for the MMMS. But that's not enough. It's also mentioned in the story. It's good that Johnny Storm and Doris Evans are Marvel fans. Wouldn't it be terrible if they preferred to read DC comics?


While everyone else goes about their work with energy and zeal, the Crazy Credits tell us that Sam Rosen has a soggy pen. I don't believe it. His lettering is much too clear.




Title: Face-To-Face at last with Baron Mordo

Writer: Stan Lee
Artist: Steve Ditko

Villain: Dormammu, Baron Mordo

Regulars: Ancient One, Hamir (unnamed), Clea (unnamed)

This is the third part of the Doctor Strange-Dormammu-Baron Mordo epic. Doctor Strange returns to his sanctum in New York, where Baron Mordo challenges him.

The Crazy Credits tell us that Stan Lee and Steve Ditko are unique, whereas Artie Simek was the last choice for this comic. Why's that? Was Sam Rosen too busy lettering the latest Spider-Man story?



Other comics published this month:

Millie the Model #128 (Stan Lee, Stan Goldberg)
Kid Colt Outlaw #122 (Stan Lee, Jack Keller)
Two Gun Kid #75 (Stan Lee, Dick Ayers)
Sgt. Fury and his Howling Commandos #18 (Stan Lee, Dick Ayers)




Here's a special announcement from the Merry Marvel Marching Society. From next month onwards all the names and addresses of the members will be printed in the comics. Gee whiz! Stand up and be counted!

Friday, 2 November 2018

The Wicker Man [2006 version] (4½ Stars)

Once meek, and in a perilous path,
The just man kept his course along
The vale of death.
Roses are planted where thorns grow,
And on the barren heath
Sing the honey bees.

Then the perilous path was planted,
And a river and a spring
On every cliff and tomb,
And on the bleachèd bones
Red clay brought forth;

Till the villain left the paths of ease,
To walk in perilous paths, and drive
The just man into barren climes.

Now the sneaking serpent walks
In mild humility,
And the just man rages in the wilds
Where lions roam.


As promised, I've watched both versions of the Wicker Man back to back. I can't say which of the two is a more accurate adaptation of the novel on which they're based, "Ritual" by David Pinner, so I'll have to judge them by the merits of the films themselves.

Edward Malus (Nicolas Cage) is a traffic policeman in southern California. He lives halfway between San Francisco and Los Angeles, judging by the maps on the wall of his police station. He receives a letter from his ex-fiancée Willow telling him she needs his help because her daughter Rowan has gone missing. She lives on a private island called Summersisle in Washington's Puget Sound. When he arrives he finds out that the missing girl is also his own daughter. He runs around the island flashing his Highway Patrol badge pretending he's there on official police business, but nobody believes him.

First the islanders deny that they know Rowan. When he finds proof of her existence they say she's dead, but he can't find a body. Convinced that she's still alive he continues the search, hampered by the uncooperative islanders.


Both films were box office failures, but the 1973 version was the bigger failure. (The 1973 version has a success rate of -11.1, whereas the 2006 version has a success rate of only -1.0). The 1973 version is rated higher by critics. A lot of film fans that I've talked to call the 2006 version awful, but I don't think that it's bad at all. They only think it's bad because they're comparing it with the 1973 version. So what qualities does each film have?

The 1973 version contains a fascinating element of religious conflict. Sgt. Howie is a deeply religious man, whereas Edward Malus has no interest in Christianity. The 1973 version has more colour to it, i.e. more fanciful costumes at the Mayday celebrations. It's also a lot more sexual, with frequent nude scenes.

The 2006 version has more of a human edge to it, making us sympathise with the policeman. Sgt. Howie was just doing his job, whereas Edward Malus has personal reasons for his investigations. The biggest difference is that the 2006 version shows Summersisle as a matriarchal community. It's a women's community, and men are only allowed to live in order to do menial labour and breed. Men receive no school education, and they're not even able to talk.


In the 1973 film the island was ruled by Christopher Lee as Lord Summerisle, but here we have Ellen Burstyn as Sister Summersisle. It's hard to believe she was 74 when she appeared in the film. She looks a lot younger.

I'm biased, I admit. I find the concept of a society ruled by women fascinating. It would be unpleasant if I weren't allowed to put my intellect to use. I don't just want to be able to speak, I want to be able to write my blog. On the other hand, being used for breeding purposes is a fate I could deal with.

The 2006 film has an element of comedy bubbling below the surface. Edward Malus is nowhere near as important as he wants everyone to think. He's a fool, and he doesn't realise it.

I can appreciate both films. I said in the past that I preferred the 1973 version, but after watching them back to back I've changed my mind. I like them both equally, and I've given them the same rating.

Success Rate:  - 1.0

Thursday, 1 November 2018

The Wicker Man [1973 version] (4½ Stars)


Today I'm finally keeping a promise that I made two years ago. I promised to watch the two versions of the Wicker Man back to back. I watched the 1973 film today and I'll watch the 2006 film tomorrow.

I seem to be one of the few people who actually likes the 2006 version. Some people call it a remake, but that's incorrect. A film is a remake if it's a copy or adaptation of a previously made film. If two films are both based on the same book, the second film can't be called a remake. They're just different versions of the same story. Both Wicker Man films are based on the novel "Ritual" by David Pinner.

Putting it a different way, if a film has an original screenplay all future films that tell the same story are remakes. If a film has an adapted screenplay all future films that tell the same story are new versions. For instance:

"City of Angels" (1998) is a remake of "Wings of Desire" (1987).

"Dracula" (1958) isn't a remake of "Nosferatu" (1922), it's a new version.


Christopher Lee made more than 250 films in his lifetime. He's best known for playing Count Dracula in various films. Younger people might know him better as Saruman in the Lord of the Rings Trilogy. However, he claimed at the end of his life that "Wicker Man" was his best film. I don't know what criteria he used for this judgement. Maybe he only meant that it's the film he most enjoyed making. Whatever the reason was, he appreciated it more than all his other more famous roles.


Although Edward Woodward appeared in many films he's best known for his television roles. Some people like him best in the title role of "Callan", others prefer him as Robert McCall in "The Equalizer". When he was asked to play the spy boss Mr. Jones in "La Femme Nikita", his character was based on David Callan from the TV series.

In the film Edward plays Neil Howie, a sergeant in the Highland Police Force. It's not stated where he comes from (at least not in the film, maybe in the book), but I assume that as a senior officer he would have been based in Inverness. He travels to Summerisle, a fictional island in the Outer Hebrides, after receiving a letter asking him to find a missing girl.

The islanders are very uncooperative. First they claim they don't know the girl. When Sgt. Howie finds proof of her existence, they say that she's dead. He visits the cemetery, and her coffin is empty apart from a rabbit. His investigations go round in circles.

For Sgt. Howie it's not just about solving the case. He's a deeply religious Christian, and he's horrified by the paganism and sexual immorality that he sees on the island. He's engaged to be married, and he's still a virgin because he considers sex before marriage to be a sin. The sexual temptations are great.


He manages to resist Britt Ekland, the innkeeper's daughter, even though the sweat is pouring off his face.


He even manages to resist Ingrid Pitt, the librarian. I couldn't have resisted her. No way!


Even the village schoolgirls are over-sexualised. When he visits the school they're being taught about phallus symbols. He gets nervous and yells that it's disgusting.


At the centre of everything is Christopher Lee as Lord Summerisle. He's polite and well spoken, and he promises full cooperation in the investigations, but his answers are always evasive, as far as the inquiries into the missing girl are concerned. When it comes to the matter of religion he's more open and speaks at length. He defends the paganism practised on the island. It all makes more sense than the religion that Sgt. Howie follows. The islanders bring yearly sacrifices to the Gods, and in return they have a good harvest.


When it was released in the cinemas "The Wicker Man" was a commercial failure. Not even the big names in the cast could tempt people into the cinemas. Maybe the posters were confusing and people didn't know what to expect. Whatever the reason, it failed. In later years it acquired a cult following and now has ardent admirers.

Success Rate:  - 11.1

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

The Villainess (5 Stars)


I don't know why this film is called "The Villainess". Sook-hee, pictured above, isn't a bad person. The people around her are the villains, not her.

Admittedly, Sook-hee kills 59 men in the film's first five minutes, before we even find out her name, but that doesn't make her a bad person. We find out later that she was getting revenge on the gang responsible for her husband's death. She did what any other woman would have done. She grabbed her guns and her knives and went on a killing spree. When she was finished she surrendered to the police. But that's just the beginning.


At the eight and a half minute mark we see the title screen, as shown above. According to the subtitles this word means "Villainess". Is that correct? Do I have any Korean readers who can verify it?

Sook-hee never goes on trial. The newspapers report that she committed suicide before she could be arrested. She finds herself in a secret facility surrounded by other young women. They're all being trained as assassins, although after seeing Sook-hee's initial performance it doesn't look like she needs much training. The organisation is never named, it's just called the Agency. They're the good guys, or so they claim. They have very doubtful methods to reach their goals. It's similar to the film "Nikita" and even more similar to the TV series based on it, "La Femme Nikita".

After her training is complete she's allowed to move out and live a normal life. She finds a career as a stage actress. All that's expected is that for the next seven years she carries out assignments whenever necessary. After that she's free to go.


Sook-hee's first assignment is an easy success. The second assignment causes problems. The man she's told to kill looks like her dead husband. Is it possible it really is her husband?

Ironically, the second assignment is on the day of her second wedding. She doesn't even have time to change out of her dress. Her new husband is a nice young man that she met the day after she left the Agency. What she doesn't know is that he's really an Agency employee who has been assigned to look after her. That crosses the line of decency, in my opinion.

I've never liked Korean films, but this is different. It well deserves its five star rating.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de