Thursday, 9 February 2023

Smallville 2.05 - Nocturne



A misty graveyard at night. A lone figure riding a horse. Television viewers could be forgiven for thinking they've tuned in to an episode of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer". No, this is "Smallville", and it's Lana Lang visiting her parents' grave on horseback. It's strange for a young girl to be out so late at night, especially since she has school the next morning. I assume she was working late at the Talon, the cafe she co-owns with Lex Luthor. She finds a letter on her parents' grave addressed to her. It contains a poem:

Beneath this moon, beneath this star,
Shimmering sirens gather from afar,
But upon your sight, upon your graces,
They have closed their lips and silenced their voices.

And through the woods, through the trees,
Ravishing nymphs scurry to be seen,
Making mischievous as they go,
They stop in awe at this wondrous glow.

Taking in your beauty and your sight,
They realise the falsehood of their plight
And surrender their ways and their worshippers too.
Forgive them, for they are only envious of you.

Lana sees someone watching her, but he runs away.

The next day at school Lana tells her friends. Chloe finds the poem and the way it was given her romantic. Pete warns that it might be a stalker. Clark just finds the poem mushy. Lana still doesn't know what to think, so she takes the poem to the Talon with her after work. Lex finds the poem and is impressed. "The imagery's a little naive, but the meter's actually quite sophisticated". Lex quotes a poem to her from memory:

Take me to you, imprison me,
For I never shall be free,
Nor ever chaste, except you ravish me.

Lana recognises it immediately as a poem by John Donne, one of her favourite poets. She's cleverer than me. I'd never heard of him. I looked him up, and he was a contemporary of William Shakespeare. The styles of their sonnets are similar. The main difference is that Donne was a religious man, which is reflected in his poetry, whereas Shakespeare was profane.

Clark interrupts Lana and Lex in the Talon. Is he there for a coffee or to see Lana? That's a rhetorical question. The following conversation is amusingly ironic:

Clark: "Don't you think it's weird? The guy's sneaking around watching you".
Lana: "Come on, Clark, don't tell me you've never watched somebody from afar".

If I'd been in Clark's place I would have blushed furiously. He's been watching her with his telescope for years. We've only seen him watching her on the porch, but I'm sure he's also been looking at her bedroom window, hoping she'll leave the curtains open. What else do you expect from a teenage boy? When I was young there was nobody I could spy on. There were trees at the back of my parents' garden that blocked the view of the houses opposite. I had a friend, the same age as me, whose house overlooked a school playing field. I shan't embarrass him by naming him, but if he's reading this post he knows who he is. He used to sit at his window with his binoculars watching the girls doing sports. I used to grin and say he was being naughty, but secretly I was jealous of him. I can admit it now. As a teenager I was shy, but now that I'm older I'm open about my feelings.


The poet is a young man called Byron Moore. He took part in medical experiments at Metcon, a Luthorcorp subsidiary, aimed at curing the behaviour of anti-social children. Six of the children died, but Byron experienced a strange change. Whenever he's in the sunlight he transforms into a monster. His parents keep him locked in their cellar, and to avoid investigations they've faked his death. He's been in the cellar for eight years, but he's dug a hole to get in and out at night.


When Clark rescues Byron from his cellar. the sensitive boy who writes poetry turns into a vicious monster. It's a similarity with Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, but Al Gough says that his primary inspiration was the Hulk. It's the first time that Clark has been confronted by someone whose strength matches his own. Byron tosses Clark through the air like a rag doll.

Byron wants revenge on Lionel Luthor for his condition. Lionel is currently residing in his son's mansion while he's blind. Is the blindness permanent or temporary? The doctors don't know, but they say he should prepare for the worst by learning how to deal with blindness. It's interesting to see that he can still play piano. Is it usual for piano players to be able to play without looking at the keys? Maybe top concert pianists, but Lionel is just an amateur.


Lionel needs a personal assistant to help him while he's blind. Lex has sent four young graduates to him, but Lionel has rejected them all. Then there's a happy coincidence. Lionel is sitting in the garden with an electronic reader for his newspaper, getting annoyed by the emotionless mechanical voice. Martha Kent arrives to discuss Lex's order for biological farm produce. She sits and reads the newspaper aloud for Lionel. Then she gives her comments on what she's just read in the business section, and Lionel is amazed by her understanding. He hires her as his new assistant.


Clark's mother is a woman of many talents. What did she do before she married Jonathan? What was her education? DC comics fans should be able to tell me the answer. Unless, of course, the television series has given her a different background. Maybe the television series has been modernised. She first appeared in the comics in 1939, so she may have been a lot more timid.


Martha was featured on the first page of Superman #1 in 1939. She's portrayed as an old woman. I'm glad she looks different in the television series.




Martha Kent, as played by Annette O'Toole, is a beautiful woman. She's also a strong woman who doesn't just do what her husband tells her to do. She's the sort of woman I like.

Lionel wants to fly to Metropolis in his helicopter, but Byron arrives and stops it taking off. Clark comes and challenges him. Clark always turns up at the right time. Clark pushes him into a well, and he turns back into his normal self in the darkness.


Now to the podcast itself. It's the first episode that Michael and Tom have recorded this year, even though it was only broadcast yesterday. That means there's about a four week delay after their recordings. That must make it difficult for people who want to ring in with questions.

Michael can't remember the episode at all. He confesses that he didn't watch the episodes after making them. Not being the main character, he wasn't in all the scenes anyway. Tom also remembers very little about the episode. His only clear memory is the scene where Pete Ross was thrown through the air by Byron. Sam Jones didn't do the stunt himself, of course. His stuntman jumped off a building and through the front window of a car. Tom remembers watching the stunt and worrying that the stuntman might be dead, but he just climbed out of the car and said it hurt a bit. Stuntmen are crazy. Does anyone doubt it?

The helicopter was the episode's most expensive scene. Tom assumes that they needed all day to film it, but once again, he can't remember. Helicopters were used a few times in the series, and they always took a huge chunk of the budget.

Michael spontaneously rang Al Gough to ask him about the episode. He says that he'll often do it again in future. He'll ring Al if there are any questions, and he'll either answer or he won't. Michael spoke to Al for about four minutes. Michael finds it strange that Martha Kent should work for Lionel Luthor, since her husband doesn't like him, but Al defended the decision to write this story. He said it was important for him to develop Martha as a character. He wanted to show that she's a strong, independent woman.

Unlike Michael and Tom, Al has a good memory of the episode. He admits, in retrospect, that it was "not one of our finest hours". The whole Byron character is corny. Why should he have the same name as the real life English poet Lord Byron? It's a strange coincidence. Why should Lana visit her parents' graves at 2 am? Why should Byron's parents keep him locked in the cellar instead of talking to him and explaining that he should stay indoors? There are so many little details about the episode which you'd miss on casual viewing, but when you sit down and talk about it you notice the mistakes.

There are two Easter eggs in the episode, plumply inserted by the writers, Al Gough and Miles Miller. Firstly, when Clark says that he doesn't like the poem written by Byron, Lana calls him a man of steel. Secondly, when Clark sees his mother getting into a helicopter with Lionel Luthor, he says "My family doesn't fly much", to which Lex replies, "Trust me, that's about to change". Michael Rosenbaum discussed the first Easter egg at length, calling it too direct, but he missed the second Easter egg.


The Talon is advertising a silent film festival. Didn't they already have one?


Wait a few seconds as the camera pans downwards. Have you seen that man and woman before? Yes, they were walking past the Talon in the episode "Stray", carrying the same basketball. It looks like the director is cutting costs by re-using old establishing shots.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Wednesday, 8 February 2023

Searching (3 Stars)


This is a low budget thriller that was very successful when it was released in 2018. It's a film about a father who desperately searches for his missing daughter by hacking into her emails and social media accounts. He's aided by a police detective, but he finds that he's more effective in finding clues than she is.

The gimmick of this film is that it all takes place on computer and smartphone screens. Unlike "Unfriended", it doesn't take place in real time. Another difference to "Unfriended" is that the computer screen doesn't always fill up the whole picture. Sometimes it does, but at other times the picture pans from left to right to highlight different parts of the computer screen.

The story about the missing girl is interesting, and there are several twists and turns, leading to dead ends, before the mystery is finally solved. But it's all about the gimmick. That's what I want to judge, and in my mind it's badly done. There are too many mistakes. In text chats we don't only see the father typing live, we also see the person on the other end typing and correcting himself before he sends the text. That's wrong. It doesn't happen in any text program I know. Sometimes when the father is brooding we see his face as if he's filming himself. That's technically possible, of course, but why would he sit in front of his computer watching himself? The live television broadcasts are shown on a computer screen, again technically possible, but because the father is in the broadcasts, the question is whose computer screen is being shown? Is it some random character who we never see in the film?

These discrepancies spoiled my enjoyment of the film. Obviously the critics disagree, based by their glowing reviews. Maybe they aren't as well acquainted with computers as I am.

Success Rate:  + 83.9

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk

Yes, the information in my Amazon box is correct. The film has never been released in Germany. I bought the film while I was in England last year, based on the reviews, and I didn't watch it until today. I shouldn't take reviews so seriously. That's more wasted money.

Tuesday, 7 February 2023

Asylum (3 Stars)


This is a film I'd never heard of until a few days ago, when I saw it in the bargain bin at DM (Drogerie Müller) in Stuttgart. Four Euros for a Blu-ray with Peter Cushing and Britt Ekland's names on the cover was a tempting price. Stuttgart's biggest stores for films on Blu-ray used to be Saturn and Media Markt, but now Media Markt has closed and Saturn has down-sized. Saturn used to have a whole floor for music and films, but now there's just a small area for films in the corner of the lower floor. As far as I can tell, Saturn no longer sells 4K discs at all. Now DM is the only store left. It's true, I buy most of my films from Amazon, but I enjoy the atmosphere of walking through a store and flipping through the Blu-rays. Occasionally there's a special offer at DM which I can't refuse. For instance, "Asylum" would have cost be 12 Euros from Amazon, three times as much.

Now that the White Nights Festival is over I had time to watch it. It's an Amicus film made in 1972. In the 1960's and 1970's Amicus was considered the main contender to Hammer, particularly Hammer Horror. As far as the style goes, it's difficult to tell Amicus and Hammer Horror apart, because they had the same actors and directors. It's a shame that Amicus didn't last. Maybe the time was wrong for this type of film. Hammer also ceased operations in the 1970's.

I admit to feeling sentimental about Peter Cushing. He was an incredible actor, even though he spent most of his career acting in low budget films. (Yes, the Hammer Horror films were low budget films, but they were still extremely good). Ironically, most people know him for his appearance in "Star Wars", which was an untypical film for him. I was disappointed that he only appears briefly in "Asylum".

The film is about a young psychiatrist, Dr. Martin, applying for a job at Dunsmoor mental asylum. Today the word asylum is considered a slur, so there are more politically correct ways to describe it, such as a psychiatric hospital. But whatever it's called, it's still a place where the incurably ill are locked up for the rest of their lives. He's told that the previous head of the asylum, Dr. Starr, has had a mental break down. He's invented a new personality for himself and now lives as one of the patients. Dr. Martin is told that he'll be hired if he can recognise which one of the patients is Dr. Starr.

Dr. Martin speaks to four patients. The following film has the form of an anthology, even though the stories are original. Each of the patients explains why he's in hospital, and the stories of the first three patients involve lengthy flashbacks. The stories are told from the viewpoint of the patients, not necessarily what really happened. There are supernatural occurrences, which Dr. Martin dismisses as paranoid schizophrenia.


For instance, one of the patients sees a woman called Lucy who isn't really there. I wish I could see a woman as sexy as Britt Ekland in my bedroom.


But then again, Lucy makes the patient kill her brother. Why does paranoid schizophrenia always have to be about killing? Couldn't I just have an affair with an imaginary woman?

I've given the film a low rating because I don't like the anthology format. There are four self-contained short stories. I prefer full length films. And I want to see more than 20 minutes of Peter Cushing.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Monday, 6 February 2023

Smallville 2.04 - Red



This is a new look for Clark Kent: a black leather jacket and dark sunglasses, riding a motorbike with a beautiful blonde. No, it isn't Chloe. It's Jessie, a new girl in Smallville High. What nobody knows is that Jessie and her father are in witness protection. He intends to testify against financial fraud, and he has the evidence on computer discs that he's carrying with him. Wouldn't it have been more sensible to leave them with the police? Maybe he was worried about the police being corrupt.

Clark's story starts with the school's Ring Day. Is this a common thing in America? I know that high school students wear rings at graduation, but Clark is only in tenth grade. Apart from that, the purchase of the rings is voluntary. Ruby rings are offered to the students for $350 each. Clark's father says that the ring is a waste of money, but he leaves the decision up to Clark, expecting him to make the right decision. Clark doesn't. He buys the ring.


This is the ring as Clark puts it on.


21 years later Tom Welling still has a Smallville ring. When I watched the podcast, I thought it was the same ring that he'd kept as a memento, but they look different. One is squarish, the other is round. Or is it just the angle in the photos?

But the ring isn't a genuine ruby. The company that sold the rings cut costs by using worthless red meteor rocks instead of rubies. Worthless? As it turns out, they're much more valuable. When Clark puts the ring on it changes his personality. The expression "Bad Clark" has been used for the way he acts, but he isn't really evil. All that happens is that he loses his sense of responsibility. Maybe that really is evil. It's a matter of definition.

As we see in the episode, Clark says and does things that he always thought about, but he was too responsible to act on his thoughts. Maybe too timid as well.


Clark finally makes a move with Lana, the girl he's been pining over for years. He asks her out on a date, and then he pulls her into his arms to kiss her passionately. That's a good thing, isn't it? Lana is surprised by Clark's untypical behaviour, but she likes it.


The trouble is that he's also flirting with the new girl Jessie. Why have one girl when you can have two?


Maybe Jessie is the better match for the new Clark. She shares his lack of responsibility. When Clark takes Lana on the date he's disappointed that Lana doesn't want to drink alcohol – she's only 15 – but Jessie likes to drink. He sends Lana home so he can have fun with Jessie instead.


Clark takes his father's credit card and goes on a spending spree. He says it doesn't matter "because we don't have to pay for it yet". Believe it or not, I have a friend who defends her credit card debts with exactly the same words. In contrast, I use credit cards all the time, but I pay off the balance in full every month. Some people are responsible, some aren't.

When Jonathan tries to talk sense into his son, Clark throws him against his truck. Not hard enough to kill him, of course. That would be really evil. It's only enough to give him a sore back. Pete Ross has to help him stand up.


Back on the farm, Martha has to put an ice pack on her husband's back. This is the first time we get a look at John Schneider's manly naked chest. That's gratuitous semi-nudity for the ladies.

Clark borrows Lex's Ferrari to go on his date. The acting by Michael Rosenbaum is outstanding. He says more with his facial expressions than he could with a long speech. At first he's appreciative of Clark's new assertiveness, but then he realises that something is wrong. He goes to the farm to tell Clark's parents about his concerns. In this episode Lex shows that he's a true friend for Clark.

This is also the episode in which Lionel Luthor first meets Clark. He's suffering from (temporary) blindness, but he realises that there's something special about Clark.

Without going into too many details, Clark is healed in a confrontation with Pete and Jonathan. Pete weakens Clark with green meteor rocks while Jonathan smashes his ring.


In an epilogue, Clark visits Lana to apologise for the way he was acting. It's not a satisfactory apology, as far as Lana is concerned. Clark tells her that he regrets what he did, but he can't tell her why it happened, because he'd need to tell her about his powers. She's disappointed. She thought they could finally have a relationship, but now they're back to way things were before.

The Blu-ray has not one, but two audio commentaries. The first is by Al Gough, Miles Miller and Jeph Loeb, while the second is by Greg Beeman, Tom Welling, Michael Rosenbaum and Kristin Kreuk. There's no date on the commentaries, but they talk about the series as ongoing and frequently mention the third season My guess is that the commentaries were recorded for the season two DVD, which would have been about a year after the episode was made. Everything is still fresh. The cast haven't forgotten the episode yet. In the podcast Tom Welling says that he can't even remember kissing Kristin in the episode. That is so strange. What he does remember is the motorbike scenes. Tom couldn't ride a motorbike, so his stunt double had to alternate with him.


The podcast's special guest is Jeph Loeb, the writer of the episode "Red". This was the first episode he wrote, and he wrote many more episodes as the series continued. Unlike Michael and Tom, he has no trouble remembering his time on the series. Admittedly, he was detached from the filming. He worked in an office in Los Angeles, while the episodes were filmed in Vancouver.

Jeph began his career as a comic book writer. Most of his early work was for DC, and his later work was for Marvel. Interestingly, his mini-series "Superman For All Seasons" was the inspiration for "Smallville". After watching the podcast I read the series, and I can see the influence. It's appropriate that he was asked to write episodes for the series. It was a new experience. This was his first job writing for network television. He had to grow accustomed to the four-act rhythm from one commercial break to the next. Each part had to build up to a semi-climax before the break, and then continue slowly after the break.

Supposedly "Red" is one of the highest rated episodes in the series. I assume they're talking about the IMDB rating. Tom agrees, and he gave this episode the highest rating since the Pilot. Michael disagrees. He says it's a good episode, but not one of the best. Ryan Tellez is somewhere in the middle.

One thing worth pointing out is the excellent acting by Tom Welling in this episode. Each week in the podcast he emphasises that he was a novice actor, not up to the level of the show's other cast. I understand that. However, in "Red" he shows real maturity. He manages to play Clark as a completely different character. It's not just about putting on dark sunglasses; the way he talks and everything else in his personality has changed. He's become a different person.

I apologise for my delay in writing this week's review. I had it all planned out. I scheduled time to watch the episode and the podcast on Friday evening, then write my review before the White Nights Festival. It wasn't until I turned on my Blu-ray player that I saw there were two audio commentaries. That meant an extra 90 minutes, and when I finally finished the podcast it was too late to write anything.


This week the Talon is advertising a monster movie marathon. Is the cinema still operational?


I would have been a regular at the Talon, if only to ogle the beautiful girls. Lana is the waitress, and Chloe is a regular visitor. Oh wait, I forgot they're only 15. I should be ashamed of myself!

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

VFB Stuttgart Season 2022 Match 19


VfB Stuttgart – Werder Bremen

Date: 5th February 2023, 3:30 pm

Result: 0 – 2

While I was sitting watching films yesterday, the football team that I support, VfB Stuttgart, was losing against Werder Bremen. I didn't check the result until I was on the bus on the way home. It wasn't just a loss, it was a decisive loss. It's the first home game for two years in which Stuttgart didn't score a goal. It's looking more difficult than ever for Stuttgart to climb out of the cellar.

1. Bayern München 40
2. Union Berlin 39
3. Dortmund 37
4. RB Leipzig 36
5. Eintracht Frankfurt 35
6. SC Freiburg 34
7. Wolfsburg 29
8. Werder Bremen 27
9. Mönchengladbach 26
10. Leverkusen 24
11. Köln 23
12. Mainz 23
13. Augsburg 21
14. Hoffenheim 19
15. VfL Bochum 19
16. VfB Stuttgart 16
17. Hertha BSC 14
18. Schalke 04 11

Sunday, 5 February 2023

Satan's Slaves 2: Communion (2 Stars)


This is the ninth film in the Stuttgart White Nights Festival.

The film begins in 1955. A reporter is shown that all the bodies from a cemetery have been dug up and moved into a nearby building. They've been set up neatly in lines and rows. What's disturbing is that there are muddy footprints, as if the corpses have walked into the building.

Then the story continues in 1984. A high rise building has been built on the site of the cemetery. That would never happen in England or other civilised countries. The residents of the building don't know about the cemetery, and they definitely don't know about the moving corpses.

What follows is a confusing story of deaths in torrential floods and an elevator accident in the building. A mystery is unravelled of a cult that used to worship on the site, before the cemetery was built. There are ghosts and other apparitions in the building, and.....

Stop!

This film is awful. The story goes nowhere, despite hurried explanations in the final scenes. There are repeated jump scares, but they're the result of random unrelated occurrences. I have nothing against jump scares, but they shouldn't be used as a substitute for a well written story.

Nocebo (4½ Stars)


This is the eighth film in the Stuttgart White Nights Festival.

A nocebo is the opposite of a placebo. To quote Wikipedia:

A placebo effect is the tendency of any medication or treatment, even an inert or ineffective one, to exhibit results simply because the recipient believes that it will work.

A nocebo effect is said to occur when negative expectations of the patient regarding a treatment cause the treatment to have a more negative effect than it otherwise would have.

Christine is a successful fashion designer who specialises in children's clothing. One day, while she's displaying a new collection, a sick dog approaches her. The dog shakes itself, and she's covered with ticks. As a result she develops a mysterious illness that makes her weak and have memory lapses. The doctors are unable to recognise the illness, but they suspect it's only psychological, so they give her a large cocktail of multi-coloured tablets to take every day.

Several months later a Philippine woman called Diana rings the doorbell and says that Christine has hired her as a housemaid. Christine can't remember speaking to her, but she accepts her into the house. In addition to fulfilling her normal duties, Diana has herbal remedies that cure Christine's illness. But all is not as it seems.

This is a very complex film. There are mysteries in the opening scenes that aren't explained until the end. There are frequent flashbacks to Diana's life in the Philippines. It's a film that needs to be watched more than once to be fully appreciated.

Limbo (3 Stars)


This is the seventh film in the Stuttgart White Nights Festival.

Based on the audience reaction, this was the most popular film of the festival. There was loud applause after the film was shown. I wasn't as impressed as the others around me.

The two detectives Will Yam and Cham Lau are trying to catch a serial killer in Hong Kong. At first it isn't clear whether he's a killer or not. Severed hands are found in the city, always the left hand of a woman. How do they know it's a woman? The DNA tells them. In countries like Scotland the police wouldn't be able to decide whether it's a woman, because they need to find the person and ask her whether she identifies herself as a man or a woman.

Cham has problems that hinder his work. His wife was accidentally killed by a car thief on the run. The thief, a young woman called Wong To, is imprisoned, but when she's released Cham tries to kill her, so his partner has to intervene. Wong To is sincerely sorry and offers to assist as a police informer. Will is glad of her help, but Cham still can't forgive her.

It's a very well made film, and it was the right decision to make it in black and white. The story takes place in the city's dirtiest slums. That's what disturbed me. The city looks too dark and too dirty. Objectively speaking, my fellow festival visitors were right in praising the film, but it's not my taste.

Soft & Quiet (unrated)


This is the sixth film in the Stuttgart White Nights Festival.

"Soft & Quiet" is one of the rare films that I'm incapable of rating. It's not just a matter of the film's quality. If I'm unable to say whether a film is good or bad, I get out of it by giving it a three star rating, i.e. average. But in this film it's a bigger problem. I found the film personally disturbing. I can understand what the director is trying to say, and I'm sure that she wants to make the viewer feel uneasy, but I feel too uneasy to pass judgement.

Let's get the technicalities out of the way first. The film is shot in a single take, so it runs in real time for 90 minutes. It starts with Emily, a kindergarten teacher, meeting five other women in a church social room. They sit drinking coffee and eating cake, discussing one another's relationship problems. Then we find out that they're a group called the Daughters Of Arian Unity. They're a white supremacist group, and they soon move on to discuss their problems with people of other races: Blacks, Asians, Jews, they're all the enemy.

The problem I have should be obvious already. There have been many films about racists, but it's rare for the main characters to be racist. Even then, the racist usually goes through a character arc, learning to abandon his racism. In "Soft & Quiet" nobody is reformed. If anything, the young women encourage one another to greater extremism as they turn their beliefs into actions.

I'm a female supremacist. I agree with the beliefs of radical feminism that all women are superior to all men, even if they sometimes fail to live up to their potential. That makes it all the more difficult for me to accept a film in which almost all of the characters are women with poor personalities. The only men are the church pastor, who throws the women out when he overhears their conversation, and Emily's husband, a weak man who's also a racist.

I'll probably watch the film again. I might decide to rate it next time. Or maybe not.

Saturday, 4 February 2023

Project Wolf Hunting (5 Stars)


This is the fourth film in the Stuttgart White Nights Festival.

I can't write too much about this film, because it's a genre buster. For the first half of the film you think it's one type of film, and then it turns into something else.

The film is about the extradition of violent criminals from the Philippines to South Korea. A large number of Korean criminals who had been hiding in the Philippines are transported by ship back to South Korea to stand trial. But they free themselves and a battle with the police guards ensues.

Is this a good film or a bad film? It depends on what you're looking for. I spoke to two people after the film. One said it was the best film of the festival so far. The other said that the story is stupid. They're both right. The film has violence for the sake of violence, with one person dying after another. In a typical last-man-standing film you can guess at the beginning who'll survive; it's the person who's given the most character development. That's not what happens in "Project Wolf Hunting". Every time a character is highlighted and we grow to like him, he's killed in the next scene. But I can appreciate the film as a gorefest.

The gore is extreme. It's not for the faint of heart. Be warned.

Evil Eye (4 Stars)


This is the third film in the Stuttgart White Nights Festival.

The film starts with the tale of three girls, triplets, who were threatened by a witch. Two of them are seduced into following evil ways, while one remains pure.

That was in the past. In the present day, Luna is a young girl with an incurable illness. Having given up on doctors, her mother Rebecca takes her and her older sister Nala to live with their grandmother Josefa, who claims to be a witch. Rebecca hopes that Luna can be cured by supernatural methods. Nala suspects that her grandmother wants to do Luna and the whole family harm.

This is a beautiful film that I intend to watch again, when I get a chance. I need to watch it again. There's a plot twist at the end that I didn't really understand. I think my concentration was lacking because I was getting tired after three films.

Hit Big (2 Stars)


This is the second film in the Stuttgart White Nights Festival.

Marjaleena owns a bar in the Costa Del with her husband Mikko and her son Vili. She was crowned Miss Finland in 1985, but that was a long, long time ago. Now she spends her days drinking cheap Spanish wine.

Her ex-husband Worm, an Albanian gangster, is released after 20 years in prison. He insists on buying the bar off her. His offer isn't very generous, but Worm threatens her into accepting it. Shortly after Marjaleena moves out she discovers that Worm had buried millions of Euros below the bar. Together with her family she attempts to rob him.

The story itself isn't bad, but I found the alcohol annoying. I don't mind drinking in films, but in "Hit Big" it's ridiculously exaggerated. The family goes out to battle gangsters, and the first thing they do is drink themselves into a stupor. It just doesn't make sense.

Lockdown Tower (4 Stars)


This is the first film in the Stuttgart White Nights Festival.

The White Nights Festival is a two-day film festival that takes place every year, usually in January. It was cancelled the last two years because of the Coronavirus pandemic. With a title like "Lockdown Tower" you might think that the film is about the pandemic. Not at all. The original French title is simply "La Tour", i.e. "The Tower".

The tower in question is a high rise building for people dependent on welfare payments. In the English subtitles it's one of a series of towers called "The Projects". I didn't make out what the original French expression was, but in America "The Projects" are housing for residents with low income.

One day the tower is blacked out. Nobody can see out of the windows or the doors. Anyone who leaves is gone. Anything that partially leaves is also gone, i.e. if you stick your hand out of the window, your hand is severed when you pull your arm back in.

What follows is a psychological thriller in a claustrophobic environment. Gangs form to protect their own ethnic communities at the expense of all others. Some people plant vegetables in their apartments. Others eat dogs and cats. Some even become cannibals.

No explanation is given for the blackout. It just happens, and it never goes away. The film doesn't want to answer questions like that. It just shows how people react. It shows how bad human nature can be.

Wednesday, 1 February 2023

Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (3 Stars)


My personal definition of a good film is that it's a film that I want to watch at least three times. Please don't misquote me. I didn't say that it's a film that I've watched three times, it's a film that I want to watch three times. There are many films that I like a lot, but I haven't had time to watch them more than once. There are also films that I've watched three times, but if I saw the film today for the first time I wouldn't want to watch it another twice. "Into the Spider-Verse" is such a film. I rated it four stars when I watched it in the past, but after watching it today I dropped my rating to three stars.

I was being generous. I'm biased in favour of Marvel films. When I go to the cinema to see a Marvel film I want to like it. After watching "Into the Spider-Verse" twice already, I'm finally able to watch it with an open mind. It's not a good film. It's too silly. The whole way that Marvel handles the multiverse in its films is nonsensical. Added to that, the film has scenes that hurt my eyes. Either the colours are too bright, or the picture is blurred.


Peter Parker is Spider-Man. Spider-Man is Peter Parker.


I'm not so fussy about villains. I don't mind Olivia Octavius taking the place of Otto Octavius as Doctor Octopus.


But I don't want to see Peni Parker ever again. Or is her name Penny Parker? Or Peeny Parker?

I've been told that this is the first film in a trilogy. I hope the sequels are better.

Success Rate:  + 2.2

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Marvel 1976.09 - Captain Marvel #46


Captain Marvel #46

Title: Only one can win!

Writer: Steve Englehart, Chris Claremont
Artist: Al Milgrom

Villain: Supreme Intelligence

Regulars: Rick Jones

Flashbacks:
    Drax, Captain America, Sub-Mariner
    Blazing Skull, Original Vision,  Original Human Torch
    Cyclops, Angel, Iron Man, Black Bolt, Medusa
    Thor, Reed Richards, Ben Grimm, Spider-Man


This comic was hit by Steve Englehart's sudden departure from Marvel, which I discussed in my review of Doctor Strange #19. Fortunately, it hasn't been harmed too much. Steve Englehart plotted the story before leaving, so Chris Claremont only had to write the dialogue. 

At the end of the last issue Captain Marvel, Rick Jones, Fawn and the cyborg Rambu left the Mind Gem. Now they're flying through space towards Hala, the Kree homeworld. I'm not sure exactly how they're flying, because Captain Marvel isn't fast enough to fly such long distances in less than a year. Maybe they're being assisted by the Supreme Intelligence. Steve Englehart would have explained it if he'd written the dialogue himself. My guess is that they weren't trying to fly to Hala, they were just heading towards the Kree battle cruiser in orbit around Deneb IV. That ship could carry them to Hala in minutes.

The Supreme Intelligence teleports Captain Marvel and Rick Jones. They arrive at different destinations. Captain Marvel is in the Supreme Intelligence's chamber, facing a physical representation of the Supreme Intelligence.


He sure is ugly! Note that it isn't the Supreme Intelligence himself, because we can still see him in the machine behind him. 


Rick Jones is in the Kree battle cruiser, and he's also facing the physical representation of the Supreme Intelligence. Note that he's standing in the same pose and speaking almost the same words.

The two heroes fight the Supreme Intelligence in two separate fist fights. Whenever one of them is winning, the other is losing. It's the same problem as in the last issue. Captain Marvel and Rick Jones share the power of the nega-bands, so when one of them uses more of the power, the other weakens.

Fawn and Rambu enter the battle cruiser. Fawn uses an energy blast against the Supreme Intelligence. He says that the power matches his own, but it came from nowhere. He can't see Fawn. He's puzzled when he sees Rick Jones talking to an unseen person. Then he realises what's happening. Rick displayed his power to create superheroes in Avengers #97. Now he's unwittingly used his nega-band to create the perfect woman. Using this knowledge, the Supreme Intelligence is able to see her. He fires an energy blast that kills her.

Captain Marvel feels Rick's anguish. This distracts him, and the (other) Supreme Intelligence knocks him out.

The Millennia Bloom is now blossoming in the chamber of the Supreme Intelligence. He says that when it's in full bloom it will sing, and the song will remove the will of both Mar-Vell and Rick Jones. They will become slaves of the Supreme Intelligence. Rick will be sent to destroy the Earth.

Mar-Vell stands up. He was feigning unconsciousness. He fights the Supreme Intelligence with his natural strength alone, letting Rick use the full power of the nega-bands. Mar-Vell telepathically sends a message to Rick, telling him to fire the battle cruiser's missiles at Hala's sun. There's a massive sun flare, threatening to destroy Hala. The Supreme Intelligence has to use all his power to protect the planet.

Hala is badly damaged, but still exists. The Supreme Intelligence's screen is blank. He's probably recovering. Rick Jones finds Captain Marvel, who suggests that they return to Earth.



I'll stop reviewing the Captain Marvel comics at this point. In Captain Marvel #47 Gerry Conway takes over as writer. In the letters page he says that he's bringing Captain Marvel back to Earth to bring him into contact with Earth's superheroes, especially Spider-Man. The mind boggles. Doesn't Gerry Conway have the least idea what Captain Marvel is about? He's a cosmic superhero, not someone who hangs out in New York.

Fortunately, Gerry Conway left the series after two disappointing issues. Scott Edelman took over, definitely an improvement, but his stories reminded me more of Roy Thomas' early Captain Marvel comics, not the cosmic hero as created by Jim Starlin. After that, Doug Moench stepped in as writer. He obviously knew something was wrong with the comics, because he turned the character around. He made him a cosmic superhero again. I have mixed feelings about the stories written by Doug. His ideas were the right ones, but it's like he was pushing it too far. He was too cosmic, if that's possible. I'll re-read his stories this week, even if I don't review them.

Summing up, I liked Captain Marvel when Roy Thomas was the writer, but Jim Starlin turned him into a completely different character. Steve Englehart took over by maintaining the Jim Starlin character, but developing him in his own way. In retrospect, Jim Starlin and Steve Englehart were the only writers who had a feeling for Captain Marvel. The writers who followed them tried their best, but none of them came close.



I'll take a short break from writing about Marvel. I have to concentrate on the White Nights film festival. I'll resume my Marvel reviews next week. I've already mapped out the comics I want to review for the next three years. When I finish them I might return and add others. I don't know yet.