Friday, 31 January 2025

The Street Fighter's Last Revenge (4 Stars)


This is the third and final film in the Street Fighter series. I've heard the main character, Takuma Tsurugi, described as an anti-hero. That's not true. He isn't any sort of hero. He's a villain.

The film begins with Tsurugi accepting a contract for 10 million Yen to rescue a criminal, Go Owada, from a police raid. Tsurugi disguises himself as a policeman and participates in the arrest. He puts the criminal in his car, but instead of returning to the police station with Owada he drives away and delivers him to his brother. Owada is carrying a tape of a company executive boasting about the politicians he's blackmailed. The Owada brothers want to blackmail the company executive for a billion Yen. If they're expecting so much money, they shouldn't be cheap. If they'd paid Tsurugi it would be the end of the story, but they double cross him by giving him a suitcase filled with paper. Tsurugi takes the tape back and says he wants 100 million Yen for it. Still a good deal.

After this the story becomes more complex. It's not just Owada, there are other crooks who want the tape. Tsurugi is repeatedly under attack by enemy gangs, all of which are experienced karate fighters.

I can understand why people call Tsurugi an anti-hero. He spends the film fighting against criminals. What they forget is that he doesn't have noble motives. He only fights them for purely selfish reasons. He wants money, and he wants revenge for being betrayed.

I'm happy to say that Sonny Chiba doesn't imitate Bruce Lee as he did in the second film. It was totally unnecessary and only distracted from the action.

Wednesday, 29 January 2025

Rome 1.07 - Pharsalus


The last episode ended with the ships carrying the 13th Legion being battered by storms on their way to join Caesar in Greece. This episode opens with the aftermath. All the ships have sunk. Lucius Vorenus and Titus Pullo are washed onto a small island in the Adriatic Sea, surrounded by dead bodies. There's no way for them to survive. There are about 1200 small islands in the Adriatic Sea between Italy and Greece, and this island is no bigger than the others. Pullo attempts to catch fish, but Vorenus points out that there's no fresh water, so they'll die of thirst, not hunger.

Without the 13th Legion, Caesar's is outnumbered by Pompey's army approximately three to one. Pompey suggests that he should leave Caesar alone, because his army is running out of food and the soldiers will soon desert. The senators at Pompey's side, primarily Cato and Scipio, say that this isn't a noble strategy for a great warrior. He should attack Caesar directly.

There's a battle at Pharsalus. Against all expectations, Caesar wins. As Pompey explains later in the episode:

"The battlefield was on a plain by a river at the foot of some low hills. My men held their ground well, so I sent my horses at his right flank, which is perfectly correct. But the cowards were repulsed. Repulsed by a single cohort of reserves. They turned and fled. 200 horses. They crashed directly into my left flank. They rolled up my line like a carpet and put the whole damned army to flight. That's how Pompey Magnus was defeated. That's how the Republic died".

Pompey flees with a small band of soldiers, heading to Amphipolis. From there he intends to sail to Egypt, because he was a friend of the ruler, Pharaoh Ptolemy XIII. On the way his soldiers desert him, leaving him with only his family and a few slaves.


Brutus and Cicero ride to Caesar's camp and surrender. They expect to be punished, but Caesar welcomes them as friends. Caesar is glad to hear that Pompey has survived. He says he'll show him mercy if he also surrenders.

Back on their miniature island, Vorenus sees that the bodies of dead soldiers are floating in the water. He says this is because their bodies have been filled with Plutonic Aether. I don't know what the name for this phenomenon is in modern medical science, but the two men build a raft out of wooden planks and dead bodies. They paddle towards Greece, arriving at the Greek shore more out of luck than skill. As always, good fortune is with them. They're seen floating unconscious by Pompey's children. They're pulled out of the water and fed by Pompey's guide.

Pompey himself claims to be a merchant, but Vorenus and Pullo immediately recognise him. When it becomes clear that they'll take him captive, he begs that they'll show mercy to his wife and children. Vorenus takes mercy on him and lets him go.

When Vorenus and Pullo go to Caesar, they're told that out of the 5000 men in the 13th Legion, only 14 have survived. Caesar is angry with Vorenus for letting Pompey go, but he doesn't punish him. He says that they found his standard, they survived a storm and they landed at Pompey's feet. "They have powerful Gods on their side, and I will not kill any man with friends of that sort". Now Caesar breaks camp to follow Pompey to Egypt.


Pompey arrives in Egypt in a small boat. Instead of the Pharaoh, he's only greeted by Lucius Septimius, a former centurion who now works as a mercenary in Egypt. They shake hands, but Lucius stabs him in the chest and cuts off his head.


The ignoble death of a great general and defender of Rome. If he'd won the battle at Pharsalus, all of human history would have run differently. Think about it. Rome would have remained a Republic. The dynasty of Caesars would never have ruled. As a Republic, there would have been centuries of peace. Christians wouldn't have been persecuted. Instead of the dark ages, there would have been a golden age of science and enlightenment.

But Pompey was slain by a base traitor and lay headless in the Egyptian sea.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Monday, 27 January 2025

Drive-Away Dolls (3 Stars)



This is a film I wanted to watch in the cinema last year, but I skipped it because it was only shown with German dubbing. Now it's streaming on Amazon Prime Video, so I can catch up.

Two young lesbians have rented a car to take a trip from Philadelphia to Tallahassee, Florida. What they don't know is that the car should have been picked up by other customers who've placed a case of valuable equipment in the trunk. The road movie follows the budding relationship of the two women. Jamie is a stereotypical lesbian who wants sex with any woman she meets. Marian is a serious woman who wants a lasting relationship. Can the two women come together?

I wasn't sure whether I should reveal what's in the case, but I need to do it in order to explain what I don't like about the film. It contains plaster casts of the erect penises of five politicians and business leaders. They can be used to blackmail the men.

Or can they? It's ridiculous. How would the penises be recognised by anyone? I know the film is intended to be a comedy, but this is just silly.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.de

Sunday, 26 January 2025

Die Drei ??? und der Karpatenhund (4 Stars)


The film's title is pronounced "Die Drei Fragezeichen und der Karpatenhund", i.e. "The Three Question Marks and the Carpathanian Dog". It follows directly from last year's "The Legacy of the Dragon". In last year's review I wrote about the background of the series, so check it out to find out what's going on.

It's a German film, but the three young detectives live in America. They solve any problems, from murders to runaway cats. This time they're hired by Mr. Prentice, a man who's being haunted by a howling sound in his apartment. The film deliberately throws hints that it's a supernatural occurrence, but anyone who's read the last 238 books knows that the supernatural occurrences in the stories always have rational explanations. Nevertheless, the film's early scenes have the nature of a horror film, complete with jump scares. My grandson Oliver was terrified and had to cover his eyes several times.

The Carpathian dog in the title is a glass statue built by an artist before his death. He bequeathed it to his cousin, Mr. Prentice, but now it's been stolen. Is this connected to the haunting or just a coincidence? Watch the film to find out. Or read the book.

There was a long delay between the second film (2009) and the third (2023). Now there's a regular schedule. Exactly 12 months till the fourth film, and at the end of the credits the fifth film is announced for a release on 26th January 2025. That's good news.

Saturday, 25 January 2025

Swan Song (2 Stars)


This is a film based on true events, or at least based on a real life character. Udo Kier plays Pat Pitsenbarger, a retired hairdresser in Sandusky, Ohio. In his younger years he was also a performer in a gay bar. He's hired to do the hair of a former customer who recently passed away. She has to look beautiful in her coffin, and Pat's the best. The film follows the mishaps as Pat attempts to gather the materials for his job. Some are no longer on sale, and others are too expensive for his meagre budget.

It's a pleasant little story, and I've always been a fan of Udo Kier, but I couldn't relate to the character. Did the events really happen the way they're portrayed? It's hard to believe that a weak old man would be entrusted with such a ridiculous job.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

But I'm a Cheerleader (4 Stars)


My friend Anna introduced me to this film today. It's difficult to believe that I'd never heard of it. It's described as a comedy, but the humour is very subtle. The humour isn't so much in what the film says directly, but what it suggests.

Megan is a 17-year-old cheerleader. She seems like a normal teenage girl, but her parents suspect her of being a lesbian, so they send her to True Directions, a camp that carries out gay conversion therapy. At first she strongly denies being a lesbian, because she's been dating a boy for two years, but after intensive counselling she realises that she really does have lesbian tendencies. This shocks her, because she's a Christian and homosexuality is evil, but after recognising her lesbianism she agrees to the conversion program. After all, homosexuality is an illness that can be cured. Right? Or is it a sin? Or is it both?

The other young people in the group are less willing to be converted. Megan observes the boys kissing each other in secret, and a girl called Graham attempts to seduce her. That's a weird name for a girl. The whole group sneaks out to visit a gay bar after dark.

I shan't shy away from spoilers, because I'm sure you can guess what happens. The therapy fails, not just for Megan but for the whole group. They all become comfortable with their homosexuality, much to the horror of the camp's leaders.

I've heard of gay conversion camps in the USA. Are they ever successful? I doubt it.

The only thing that confused me is that True Directions doesn't seem to be a Christian camp. I've always assumed that gay conversion therapy is carried out by Christian fundamentalists. The participants in the therapy are encouraged to simulate heterosexual sex with one another. I can't imagine that happening at a Christian camp.

Success Rate:  + 0.6

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk

Tuesday, 21 January 2025

Inland Empire (4 Stars)


"Inland Empire" is the final film made by David Lynch in 2006. Today is the fourth time I've watched it.

I wanted to watch it in the cinema in 2006, but it wasn't shown in any cinemas in Birmingham. That made me sad. I bought it from Amazon immediately after its release on DVD in October 2007. That was a rarity for me. I usually wait a few months until the price has dropped. It cost me £20.66, which was a horrendous sum for me at the time. Usually I paid no more than £5.

I watched the film as soon as the packet dropped through my letterbox. I enjoyed it, but I didn't understand it, so I watched it a second time, taking a break only to make a cup of coffee. That was a mammoth sitting, watching a three-hour film twice. The second time round I understood it even less, so I watched one of the German "Schoolgirl Report" films to get over it. I've forgotten which one it was, probably a later film in the series, but it was easy to understand: it was about schoolgirls having sex.

I didn't watch "Inland Empire" again until 2014, when it was released on Blu-ray. I've forgotten what my impression was, but based on my brief review I still didn't understand much.

And today I finally watched it again, almost eleven years later. I've reduced my initial rating to four stars. After watching it back to back with "Lost Highway" and "Mulholland Drive" I can see that it's not on the same level.

Maybe the problem is that I'm looking for an explanation that isn't there. When David Lynch was asked to explain the film he only said that it was about a woman in trouble. Nothing else. The actress Nikki Grace plays the lead role in a remake of an unfinished Polish film called "47". The film was abandoned because the two leading actors, male and female, were murdered. Now there are rumours that the film's script is cursed.

As the filming progresses, Nikki finds it increasingly difficult to distinguish between her character in the film and her real life. She staggers around, meeting the cast of the original Polish film. Is she having a mental breakdown, or is she caught up in a supernatural curse? I don't think it really matters. There are multiple layers of the story: her real life in Hollywood, her role in the film and her life in Poland. When we think we're seeing one layer, we suddenly become aware that it's another.

I found the picture quality poor today, not up to Blu-ray standards. Parts of the film, especially in the early scenes, looked unpleasantly fuzzy. While reading about the film afterwards, I found out that David Lynch filmed parts of the film in SD. That's not good, but I assume it was a deliberate decision. Supposedly the film was upscaled to HD using an AI algorithm in 2022, supervised by Lynch himself. That's the version I want to see.

I'd be glad to discuss "Inland Empire" with any of my readers. Let's start in the comments box below.

Success Rate:  - 0.5

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Sunday, 19 January 2025

Mulholland Drive (5 Stars)


To remember David Lynch after his recent death, I've decided to watch his last three films. I might even rewatch "Twin Peaks", but it won't be now. Maybe later this year.

Today was the first time that I watched the bonus features on the Blu-ray. There's an interview with Richard Kelly, the director of "Donnie Darko". He said that he first saw the film in the cinema with Jake Gyllenhaal. Two films were being shown that evening. On one screen it was "Donnie Darko", probably the reason they were at the cinema, and on the other screen it was "Mulholland Drive". Richard felt honoured to see the name of his film written next to a film by David Lynch, and they decided to watch "Mulholland Drive". He says that he and Jake were blown away. Understandable. After this they went to visit Jake's parents, who lived on Mulholland Drive. It was a surreal experience.

Richard Kelly also said that he immediately understood the film. He must be smarter than me. I understand the film's main outline, but I still don't understand all the details. For me it's a more complex film than "Lost Highway". But that doesn't mean I don't enjoy it.

As I've said in an earlier post, the BBC has voted "Mulholland Drive" the best film of the 21st Century so far (2000-2016). I can't disagree with that, although I find some of the other inclusions on the BBC's top 100 list remarkable.

Success Rate:  - 0.7

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Saturday, 18 January 2025

Das Grüne Wunder: Unser Wald (5 Stars)


I intended to watch another David Lynch film this evening, but this DVD was pressed into my hand with the words that I really need to see it. Its title means "The Green Miracle: Our Forest". All I can say is that it's incredible. It's a nature film by Jan Haft, who also made "Die Wiese" ("The Meadow"). The real miracle is that the film was made at all. How is it possible to film events like these? For instance, we see male beetles fighting with one another to win the right to pair with a female. We see a female fox (a vixen) giving birth. How is it possible to set up a camera so close without scaring the animals away? We also see a caterpillar entering a cocoon and a butterfly emerging. Okay, that's a bit easier, because the caterpillar doesn't move. But it's still a brilliantly filmed scene.

I really need to see more films like this. They're wonderful.

And tomorrow I can return to David Lynch.

Friday, 17 January 2025

Lost Highway (5 Stars)


David Lynch is dead.

I read the news late last night, and it hit me like a bombshell.

He's best known for the TV series "Twin Peaks", which he made in 1990. I didn't watch it until 20 years later, but I was already aware of it. I had friends who talked about it. Based on their descriptions, I thought it was nothing for me. I couldn't have been more wrong.

The first film I watched made by David Lynch was "Mulholland Drive". I forget when. Probably round about 2004. After that I bought all his films in quick succession. "Lost Highway" immediately became my favourite film, knocking "Donnie Darko" off the top spot. I've often changed my mind about my favourite film, but it doesn't look like "Lost Highway" will be removed from the top spot any time soon. It's a masterpiece.

"Lost Highway" isn't an easy film to understand. There are different theories about its meaning. The most commonly held opinion is that it's a story about a man who's killed his wife and spends his final days lying in his cell making up a fictional story about her while he waits to be executed. The other theories are variations on a supernatural time loop. Interestingly, in an interview David Lynch said that he'd read the explanations of "Lost Highway" in forums and nobody had got it right. I'm glad that he rejected the fictional story theory, because it always seemed absurd to me. That leaves the many variations of the explanations based on a time loop. I have my own explanation, which I've never read in any online forum, so maybe I'm right.

On the other hand, a friend of mine who also loves "Lost Highway" says that there's no explanation. He says that David Lynch makes films for himself and doesn't intend them to be understood.

Lynch has hardly made any films in the last 25 years. His only major work was a third season of "Twin Peaks". Maybe he was put off by the poor reception of his last film, "Inland Empire"

But now he's gone.

David Lynch
January 20, 1946 – January 15, 2025

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Wednesday, 15 January 2025

The Raid 2 (5 Stars)


"The Raid 2" is being shown as my local cinema's Weird Wednesday feature today. I would have gone to see it, but the weather is awful today. There's ice on the pavements. Even with my biggest boots on I was slipping when I went to buy pretzels this morning. I don't mind falling on my butt, it's big and soft, but I've already cracked my head open in a fall and I don't want to do it again. So I've decided to stay at home and watch the film on Blu-ray in the comfort of my home. It's not the same experience as the big screen, but it's safe.

"The Raid 2" has been called the greatest action film ever. That's a matter of opinion, but it is a truly great film. It has a slightly different style to the first film. "The Raid" is a police drama, a mixture of guns and martial arts. The second film concentrates on martial arts fighting, which makes it better, in my eyes. Anyone can pull a trigger, but to kill a man with your bare hands requires skill.

The main characters use the Indonesian fighting style Pencak Silat. I've tried to find out how it differs from other fighting styles, even watching videos, but I'm not a martial arts practitioner and can't tell the difference. All I can say is that Wing Chun, the original fighting style of Bruce Lee, focuses on close up strikes, whereas Pencak Silat uses long range attacks before coming close. If any of my readers can say more about it, please leave a comment.

I enjoyed the film, as always, and I look forward to seeing it on the big screen again.

Success Rate:  - 0.5

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Monday, 13 January 2025

Shadow of the Vampire (5 Stars)


After watching "Nosferatu" on Saturday I felt inclined to rewatch the 1922 version of the film for comparison. I changed my mind and picked up "Shadow of the Vampire" instead. When's the last time I watched it? It was before I started writing my blog, so I have no exact date. I remember seeing it in the cinema in 2001, at a time when I rarely visited the cinema. It was one of the first films I bought on DVD, probably in 2003. I know I watched it a few times, but it was long, long ago. For this reason it was a good idea to choose it today.

The film follows F. W. Murnau and his filming of "Nosferatu" in 1922. Rather than tell the true story as a biopic, it tells a fantasy version of the story. Max Schreck, the man who was to play Count Orlok, wasn't an actor; he was a real vampire. After discovering him, Murnau asked him to appear in his film in exchange for being given the German actress Greta Schröder as his bride.

All went well on the film set, until Schreck got hungry and started to eat other members of the cast and crew. Murnau fights to keep Schreck's true identity a secret.

From my description the film might sound like a comedy, but it's played seriously. Willem Dafoe is genuinely scary as Max Schreck the vampire. It's tragic that this magnificent film has been forgotten with the passing of time. Despite its critical success, it's no longer available for purchase except for a Spanish Blu-ray. It has the original English version.

Success Rate:  - 0.6

Saturday, 11 January 2025

Nosferatu [2024] (4½ Stars)


"Nosferatu" is a curious candidate for a remake. It was made in 1922 by the German director Friedrich Murnau. He wanted to make a film based on Bram Stoker's novel "Dracula", but he needed permission from the owner of the book's rights, Florence Balcombe, Stoker's widow. Since she was a racist who hated Germans, she refused to allow Murnau to make the film. Refusing to be put off, he made a film based on the story, changing the names of the characters and the locations of the events. For instance, Count Dracula was renamed Count Orlok. He thought he could get away with it, because his film was only planned to be shown in Germany. Balcombe found out and sued him. The court ordered that all copies should be destroyed, but several copies were rescued. In retrospect, "Nosferatu" (the 1922 version) is considered one of the greatest horror films ever made, while Florence Balcombe's name lives on in infamy.

In 1931 she allowed the book to be adapted by an American director. The film was called "Dracula", and the characters had the correct names. Since then more than 50 adaptations of the novel have been made, not counting the many films in which Dracula appears as a character. It's the most frequently adapted book ever. I own several of the films on disc. It's interesting to see which ones are more accurate and which ones leave out details.

But "Nosferatu" stands alone as an adaptation that deliberately changed the details. Why should something incorrect be copied? Nostalgia?

In 1979 Werner Herzog made a film called "Nosferatu the Vampyre", but I don't count it as a remake of the 1922 film. Not quite. He copied the visuals of the 1922 film, but he called the characters by their correct names.

The new film is a dedicated remake of the 1922 Nosferatu film. The wrong names are used throughout. The only reason I can think of for calling it "Nosferatu" is to set it aside from all the other films called "Dracula". The suspense is outstanding. Instead of slavishly following the 1922 film it adds several details from the book.

I'm happy to say that despite being in its second week the cinema was packed, about 90% full. I don't know how it's doing in other countries, but in Germany it's a big hit.

Friday, 10 January 2025

SE7EN (4 Stars)


This is the January selection for the "Best Of Cinema" series. Usually the film is shown on the first Tuesday of the month, but it's been shifted to Friday this week for reasons unknown to me.

It's a film I've never seen before. I admit that I was put off by the film's title. It's pronounced seven, but it's written with a 7 instead of the V. Some people might think it's cool; I think it's stupid. The only advantage of misspelling the title is that it won't be confused with the Andy Sidaris film called "Seven".

"Se7en" – I hate typing that word! – was filmed in Los Angeles, but according to reviews it takes place in an unnamed fictional city. Why not just call it Los Angeles? The action takes place in grubby little streets, carefully avoiding any well known landmarks. Morgan Freeman plays William Somerset, a detective seven days before his retirement. He's joined by David Mills, a young, impulsive detective who's been transferred from a smaller city. Somerset wants to get away from violent crime, Mills is looking for it. They spend Somerset's last week working together.

There are a series of seemingly unrelated deaths. The victims have no connection to one another and come from all walks of life. At the scene of the first death the word "gluttony" is written on the wall. At the scene of the second death the word "greed" is written on the floor. The detectives surmise that they're the first two victims of a serial killer who's basing his murders on the seven deadly sins.

The killer might seem mad, but he's a very calm, religiously motivated man. He doesn't care if he's captured, as long as he can carry out his seven murders first. He wants to send the world a message that committing any of the seven deadly sins is a greater sin than traditional crimes and should be punished accordingly.

It's a good film, but is it best of cinema? That's a matter of taste. It won't ever enter my top films list.

Success Rate:  + 7.9

Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Sunday, 5 January 2025

Better Man (4½ Stars)


Have you ever had one of those days when you feel you're going to see the wrong film? When I arrived at the cinema today it was packed. The queue was so long that it stretched out of the foyer and into the entrance area. That always warms my heart. I'm happy to see cinemas doing well. Cinema attendances took ages to recover after the Corona pandemic.

But what were the people going to see? At the door where the tickets were checked, almost everyone headed straight on to watch "Nosferatu" on the largest screen downstairs. I was one of a few who went up the stairs to watch "Better Man". In fact, the theatre upstairs was almost empty. There couldn't have been more than twenty of us watching "Better Man". That's understandable. Robbie Williams was a big star in Britain, but only moderately popular abroad. In America he was almost unknown.

Nevertheless, those of us who sat watching "Better Man" were greatly entertained.

It was moving for me to see Robbie's childhood in the streets of Stoke-on-Trent. It was an important city for me in my teenage years, and the scene of one of the most dramatic events of my life. It was the place where I attempted suicide when I was 18. It was something I'd been planning for weeks. I never talked about it to anyone. I always say that people who talk about suicide won't go through with it. It's just a cry for help. There's nothing wrong with that. People who want help shouldn't be ashamed of asking for it.

I took a train to Stoke-on-Trent in the morning. I was careful not to carry anything with me that would identify me. I went onto a hill overlooking the city and swallowed a packet of rat poison, washing it down with lemonade. It had a bitter taste, difficult to swallow. Then I sat watching boys playing football lower on the hill, until I grew tired. Eventually I lay down to sleep, happy in the knowledge that I would never wake up.

But I did wake up. I don't know how long I'd been sleeping. I didn't have a watch with me. The sun was still shining, but it was summer, so it could have been two hours later. I don't know. I didn't feel bad, so I went to the train station and travelled home.

In the evening I was watching television with my mother, as if nothing had happened. Then I developed stomach cramps, so I told her what I'd done. An ambulance came. In hospital my stomach was pumped. I was told that I was very lucky. Lucky? I considered myself unlucky. I was surrounded by people asking me why I'd done it. That was a nightmare. I never told anyone the truth, even when I spent six weeks in a lunatic asylum.

I'd attempted suicide because of my mother. Growing up we'd always been close. She wasn't just a mother, she was my best friend. That changed in my mid teens. She became addicted to alcohol. She was drunk every night when she came home, and it was impossible to talk to her. This broke my heart. I'd lost her. Death was the only way out.

But I survived. Things didn't get better with my mother, but I carried on. Two years later she left my father to live with another man. I felt like she was leaving me, not him. Ironically, she never moved in with the man. They rented a small apartment together, but he got cold feet at the last moment and didn't leave his wife. I still thought about suicide, but I didn't try it again. I was terrified that I'd fail again. The aftermath of a suicide attempt is awful.

One thing though. I never returned to Stoke-on-Trent. I had friends there, but I never visited them again. I've avoided it all my life. It was emotional to see the city today. It gave me a feeling of melancholy.

I could hardly bring myself to write a review. I've backdated this post to January 5th, the day I went to the cinema, but I'm writing it a week later. I needed time to overcome myself.

Friday, 3 January 2025

Mufasa: The Lion King (4 Stars)


This is the first time I've gone to the cinema with my grandson Oliver since October. That's a long time. Usually I try to go with him twice a month.

There are a lot of children's films being shown over the Christmas holidays, but he's been busy with other things. What my friends might not know is that the Christmas holidays last longer in Germany than in other countries. Most companies are closed from 23rd December to 6th January. The reason is that the 6th of January is also a national holiday, the Holy Three Kings day, usually called the Epihany in English. It's an important day in Germany, because the skeletons were buried in the Cologne Cathedral after being passed around for centuries.


The shrine is now on an elevated platform behind the altar, and it's become a place for pilgrims to visit. I find it strange. The three kings went to Bethlehem to worship Jesus. Today the kings themselves are worshipped by Catholics, at least in Germany. This isn't right. If the kings were alive today they'd tell us they don't want to be worshipped.

Now to the film. It serves as a prequel to the classic Disney film, "The Lion King". The story seems to repeat the plot. I found the film interesting, but what fascinated me the most was the beautiful imagery. I visit the zoo in Stuttgart frequently (in some months more than others), but the animals looked more beautiful in the film than anything I've seen in the zoo.

Oliver greatly enjoyed the film. That's the most important thing. I need to encourage him to watch the glorious 1994 animated film.

Thursday, 2 January 2025

Ma (4½ Stars)


Octavia Spencer is one of my favourite actresses. I've forgotten in which film I first noticed her, but it was a long time ago. Was it "Spider-Man"? Maybe. She only has a small role, but she's very noticeable. I can't be sure. She started her career with minor roles in a few films, such as "Being John Malkovich" and "Never been kissed". I think I noticed her for her beauty first, and her acting talent later, in her leading roles in "Hidden Figures" and "The Shack".

"Ma" is a different role for her. Usually she plays a good girl, but in "Ma" she's all evil. Admittedly, there's a back story which tells us how she turned bad. She was bullied as an ugly duckling in school, and now that she's a woman she wants revenge. We can sympathise with her, even though her actions horrify us.

It's a role that she plays credibly. She's a magnificent actress.

Success Rate:  + 10.2

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Wednesday, 1 January 2025

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3 (4 Stars)


I finally got round to buying "Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3" on Blu-ray, after almost two years. I've been waiting for the price to drop, but it didn't, so I weakened and paid 9.99 Euros for it. Usually I don't like to pay more than eight Euros for a film. "Wakanda Forever" is even more expensive, currently 12.50 Euros. It wasn't even reduced in Amazon's Black Friday sale. I'll be patient.

I'll repeat what I wrote in my last review. It's a good science fiction film, but it's a poor Marvel adaptation. Whoever the five characters in the picture may be, they're not the same people that we know in the comics. Maybe Groot comes close, but not the others.


The portrayal of Warlock makes me sad. In the comics he was a noble warrior, the only person that Thanos feared, but he's just a clumsy idiot in the film. Mantis is even worse. In the comics she's deeply spiritual, despite having worked as a prostitute in Vietnam. In the films she's stupid. Not naively stupid, just stupid.

I have a suggestion. Let's reboot the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Let's start again from the beginning. New actors, and let's have stories that closely follow what was written in the comics, especially those written by Stan Lee and Roy Thomas. And let's get the costumes right. How many films did we need before Wolverine finally put on his yellow spandex? I just counted. It took him ten films. In "Deadpool & Wolverine" he finally looks right.

I need to give this film yet another chance. The critics call it one of the better Marvel films. Maybe they're right. I need to make an effort to forget the comics when I watch it next time.

Success Rate:  + 1.4

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de