Showing posts with label Zoe Saldana. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zoe Saldana. Show all posts

Wednesday, 1 January 2025

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3 (4 Stars)


I finally got round to buying "Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3" on Blu-ray, after almost two years. I've been waiting for the price to drop, but it didn't, so I weakened and paid 9.99 Euros for it. Usually I don't like to pay more than eight Euros for a film. "Wakanda Forever" is even more expensive, currently 12.50 Euros. It wasn't even reduced in Amazon's Black Friday sale. I'll be patient.

I'll repeat what I wrote in my last review. It's a good science fiction film, but it's a poor Marvel adaptation. Whoever the five characters in the picture may be, they're not the same people that we know in the comics. Maybe Groot comes close, but not the others.


The portrayal of Warlock makes me sad. In the comics he was a noble warrior, the only person that Thanos feared, but he's just a clumsy idiot in the film. Mantis is even worse. In the comics she's deeply spiritual, despite having worked as a prostitute in Vietnam. In the films she's stupid. Not naively stupid, just stupid.

I have a suggestion. Let's reboot the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Let's start again from the beginning. New actors, and let's have stories that closely follow what was written in the comics, especially those written by Stan Lee and Roy Thomas. And let's get the costumes right. How many films did we need before Wolverine finally put on his yellow spandex? I just counted. It took him ten films. In "Deadpool & Wolverine" he finally looks right.

I need to give this film yet another chance. The critics call it one of the better Marvel films. Maybe they're right. I need to make an effort to forget the comics when I watch it next time.

Success Rate:  + 1.4

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Saturday, 13 May 2023

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 3 (3 Stars)


This is the 32nd film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU). It's a difficult film for me to rate. It depends on my criteria. As a sci-fi comedy it's a great film, worth five stars. As a Marvel adaptation it's awful. My three star rating is an average of the two extremes, but also a sign that I don't know how to rate it.

Adam Warlock is one of my favourite heroes in the comics, but what's happened to him? Roy Thomas portrayed him as the Messiah of Counter-Earth, but in the film he's a buffoon. And wasn't the High Evolutionary a good guy in the comics? He's been totally distorted in the film.

The members of the Guardians themselves are nothing like their incarnations in the comics, but I've already got used to it, so I won't comment on them here. The only character in the film who's true to the comics is Howard the Duck, but his appearance is so brief that it's hardly worth mentioning. Seth Green isn't even included in the credits.

The critics like the film, which I find curious. "The best Marvel movie in years"? That's only because the last few films have been so bad.

Just one small spoiler: At the end of the film Star-Lord (Peter Quill) leaves the Guardians of the Galaxy, but a few minutes later we read the words "The legendary Star-Lord will return". Does this mean he'll have a solo film?

As always, I'll return to the film when it's released on disc. It deserves another chance.

Wednesday, 29 January 2020

Avengers: Endgame (5 Stars)


Stan Lee didn't create the character Thanos. He was created by the writer/artist Jim Starlin in 1973, when Stan had already given up most of his writing activities at Marvel. Nevertheless, Stan Lee laid the foundation for the Marvel Universe, and he created the Avengers and most of the other heroes in the film. His contribution to comics and modern culture overall can't be underestimated.

The Blu-ray disc of "Avengers Endgame" that I watched today has a short tribute to Stan Lee. It's not a full tribute, it's just a review of his cameo appearances in the Marvel Cinematic Universe films.


These words, spoken by director James Gunn, express my thoughts precisely:

"My hero. The greatest man alive".

Stan Lee has passed away since this photo was taken, and the world is a poorer place without him. However, for me he still lives on in his writing. In the course of writing my Marvel Years posts I read his comics regularly. I'm up to mid 1971, close to the end of his regular writing. Other less capable writers stepped into his footsteps. Some of Marvel's writers were good, some were average, some were poor, but even Marvel's best writers weren't Stan Lee. He had a spark of genius that others could only dream of.

The most touching part of the tribute is when Robert Downey Jr kneels before Stan Lee and kisses his hand. That wasn't an empty affectation, it's a sign that he truly loved him. As do I.


Asking whether there will ever be another Stan Lee is like asking if there will be another William Shakespeare. It's not impossible, but it's highly unlikely.


On an unrelated matter, I've been running into the limitations of Google's Blogger (Blogspot). I add labels to posts to list the actors who appear in a film. Not every actor, just the ones that I consider to be the major actors. That's five or six actors per film, on average, but the last two Avengers films, "Infinity War" and "Endgame", have an overwhelming ensemble of big actors. Blogger limits me to a maximum of 20 labels per post, so I've been forced to omit some of the actors. Originally I omitted the actors who play smaller parts. Now I've decided to do the opposite. I've omitted the labels for the actors who play the biggest roles, because people know they're in the film anyway. The actors that I have omitted from the labels are:

Chris Evans (Captain America)
Chris Hemsworth (Thor)
Mark Ruffalo (Hulk)
Robert Downey Jr (Iron man)
Scarlett Johansson (Black Widow)
Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury)

Nuff said!

Success Rate:  + 5.8

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Wednesday, 31 July 2019

Avengers: Endgame (5 Stars)


This is the third time I've seen "Avengers: Endgame". The first time I saw it was in a German cinema. The second time was in an English cinema. Today I watched it in a friend's house, in beautiful 4K resolution and supposedly Dolby Surround Sound. I say supposedly, because I wasn't aware of being surrounded by the sound. It seemed to be coming to me from the front, like a normal stereo soundtrack. I'm saying that as a compliment. If I'm watching a film that's taking place in front of me, I don't want to hear the noises behind me.

I feel quite jealous of the beautiful movie system that I enjoyed today. It's not a matter of money. I could afford it if I wanted to. My trouble is the size and layout of my room. The furthest I can sit away from the screen is 135 cm (53 inches), so the largest screen that would be sensible for me is 49 inches.

Yesterday I watched "Avengers: Infinity War", which helped me to appreciate "Avengers Endgame" in its context. "Infinity War" has action all the way, whereas "Endgame" is slow and  mournful, with only occasional action scenes, all of which are splendid when the action breaks out. For the first hour very little happens at all. We meet the characters, and we share their sorrow after having lost so many friends.


I'm pleased to see that Captain Marvel's powers haven't been toned down in the film. Of the highly powered heroes, she's the only one who lives up to her strength in the comics. This makes her the most powerful hero in the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe), unlike the comics, where several heroes have greater power, such as Warlock and the Silver Surfer. The original male Captain Mervel in the comics was also stronger than her.

Where do the Avengers go from here? Where does the MCU go from here? Kevin Feige, the producer of the MCU, has promised that there won't be an early reboot, starting the Avengers again from the beginning with younger actors. In "Endgame" several characters were killed, and others will disappear because the actors haven't renewed their contracts, so now they've gone for good. They'll be replaced by other Marvel characters; there are so many to choose from. This is a good idea, but we can't go on like that forever. The best, most appealing characters are the ones that Stan Lee invented in the 1960's, and cinema audiences will grow bored when they've disappeared. A reboot is inevitable, but when will it happen? I don't know yet. The Marvel bosses will make a decision based on the viewing figures.

"Avengers Endgame" has become the highest grossing film ever, if the figures aren't adjusted for inflation. That's one of the advantages of my Success Rate. It's a relative number from comparing the budget and the box office takings, so inflation doesn't play a role. My way of calculating the Success Rate makes "Endgame" the most successful film in the MCU, but less successful than the non-MCU Marvel film "Venom", which scored + 6.6.

Success Rate:  + 5.8

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

In the review I wrote yesterday about "Avengers: Infinity War" I said that Thanos would never retire and become a hermit or a farmer. One of my friends sent me a message, saying that I was mistaken. He pointed out, quite correctly, that after he lost the Infinity Gauntlet to Adam Warlock he became a farmer, "scraping out a living from the soil". However, this is what he became after losing the Gauntlet. He would never have become a farmer if he had remained the universe's supreme being. He was exiled to live alone on a remote planet by Adam Warlock, so what else could be do except to farm the land?


As we can see, he's become very stoic. He accepts his new position in life. However, I don't believe he would have taken this position voluntarily.

The story of Thanos continues in Marvel comics, some of them written by Jim Starlin, but for me this page isn't just the end of the Infinity Gauntlet saga, it's the final end of what I consider to be Marvel canon.

Tuesday, 30 July 2019

Avengers: Infinity War (5 Stars)


Despite my love for this film, I have to point out – yet again! – that it's not the same Thanos that we know in the comics.

In the comics written by Jim Starlin, Thanos' motivation for killing half of the universe isn't to achieve a cosmic balance or to solve the problems of overpopulation. It's a sacrifice for the woman he loves, Death. He thinks it's something that will please her and make her love him. I don't know whether I'll get as far as the Infinity Gauntlet comics in my Marvel Years posts. That's in 1991, and I'll probably stop when I get to 1984. I'm not sure yet.

Thanos would never retire and become a hermit or a farmer. If he destroyed half of the universe he would want to rule over the other half.

So much to his motivation. As for the Snap, it wasn't a magical act powered by the gloves. He could have killed half of the universe merely by thinking about it. The finger snapping is just a gesture to show that killing trillions of people is as easy as snapping his fingers.


What I likie about this film is its epic quality. There are battles taking place at the same time all over the world, and all over the universe. Some of the battles are very close, and we expect the good guys to win. In other battles it's obvious that they're too weak, but all the battles are enjoyable.

We can almost like Thanos. He's an environmentalist who is carrying out a plan to save the universe. In the film at least. Maybe he's not Thanos as we see him in the comics, but his benevolent nature is suitable for the film. Films profit from having villains that we can sympathise with. That's not so necessary in comics. It's just an added plus.


"You can't be a friendly neighbourhood Spider-Man if there's no neighbourhood".

Don't worry, Peter Parker, there will still be a neighbourhood after Thanos snaps his fingers; there will just be less children playing in the street.


Is there anyone else who disagrees with the German translation of "Wakanda Forever"?


This character isn't named in the film, but in the credits she's listed as Proxima Midnight, a post-canon servant of Thanos. She was played by two actresses: Carrie Coon in facial close-ups, and Monique Ganderton when her full body was shown. She returns in "Avengers Endgame", but in that film she's only played by Monique Ganderton. I think that she has a fascinating face. Fascinatingly evil.

I intend to rewatch "Avengers Endgame" tomorrow. I can judge the films better if I watch them back to back.

Success Rate:  + 4.5

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Thursday, 16 May 2019

Avengers: Endgame (5 Stars)


While I was in Birmingham this week I went to see "Avengers: Endgame" again. It was suggested by my daughter Fiona. She saw it last week, but she didn't understand it. That's not surprising. The first MCU film that she watched was "Black Panther". "Endgame" – I'll shorten the title – refers to so much of the early films that it must be totally incomprehensible to any johnny-come-latelys. Or should that be spelt johnny-come-latelies? I don't know if there's a special rule for the plurals of adverbs.

I sat explaining to Fiona the previous 21 MCU films, concentrating on the ones most prominently referenced in "Endgame": "The Avengers", "Thor: Dark World" and "Guardians of the Galaxy". At first she sat attentively, but as I continued she was overwhelmed by the long list of names and her face went blank. She found a full review of "Endgame" in YouTube and listened to the first minute, but it was awful. The reviewer was just rattling off the plot at a breakneck speed, which confused her even more.

So we went to the cinema. There was a 4DX screening at Cineworld on Broad Street, which we chose because neither of us have seen 4DX films before. If you don't know this technology, it's a way to immerse the viewer in a film by provoking his other senses, not just sight and sound.


This is the 4DX theatre in Cineworld Broad Street. Eight rows with 20 seats each, arranged in groups of four. The gap at the front left is possibly for wheelchair users, but I would have to ask about that. I don't consider 4DX suitable for wheelchair users, unless the functionality is limited.

I know that it's officially been allowed to give away "Endgame" spoilers now, but I shan't. I'll just review the 4DX experience.

There are extensive warnings on the door before you enter. You shouldn't use 4DX if you're pregnant, you shouldn't use 4DX if you're shorter than 1.30 meters (4'3"), plus many seemingly random restrictions. The cinema obviously wants to protect itself from all possible lawsuits.

When you sit down you're supposed to put your head on the headrest and your feet on the footrest. The only controls on the seat itself are for the water. You can turn off the water sprays to stop yourself getting wet. That's a setting for wimps. Why would anyone want to stay dry in a cinema?

The most enjoyable feature was the chair motion. The chairs move in all directions at different speeds. When there are fights the motion is fast and jerky. I found it effective that when a plane was flying the chair very slowly tilted forward, giving the impression of movement.

There was frequent wind blowing, mainly from my left. That's possibly because I was sitting on the left of the four-chair group. It gave me the impression of being outside. This was mostly appropriate.

One strange feature is the vibration of the chairs. This was usually done whenever there was a loud noise. I found it somewhat arousing, because the vibrations went straight through my testicles. I suspect that it might be even more exciting for women. However, I have to admit that despite the cheap thrill this did nothing to enhance the movie experience.

During the fights I was sometimes poked by a rod underneath my right shoulder blade. When I checked the chairs afterwards I found two rods, on the left and the right, but the left rod was never used. Maybe it was broken on my chair. This was a weird feeling. It would have had to hit me a lot harder to simulate a fight.

There was a very pleasant smell in the scene where Thanos is walking in his garden. I liked it a lot. The scent feature was only used in this one scene. I would like to experience it in a film more often, so I can compare the scents, whether they change from scene to scene.

One thing I didn't like was the lights that flashed on the sides of the theatre when there was an explosion or something similar. This was highly annoying.

What about the water? "Endgame" isn't a very wet film, but I experienced it in one of the opening scenes. When Hawkeye killed the Japanese Yakuza boss I felt his blood splashing on my face. That was a nice touch. In a later scene, when it was raining, I felt a few drops of rain on my face. That wasn't enough. I should have walked out of the cinema with my t-shirt dripping wet.

My overall impression is that 4DX is a nice gimmick, but it's not something I like enough to want to do it often. 4DX costs £4.70 more than the normal ticket, and for that price it's really not worth it.

Thursday, 2 May 2019

Friday, 1 February 2019

Avengers: Infinity War (5 Stars)


This is the 19th film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, released in April 2018. It's the big film that Marvel has been working up to, ever since "Iron Man" in May 2008. The ten years of planning have  paid off. Despite the big differences from the comics it's an exciting film with the atmosphere of a mega-crossover-event.

I'll only talk about one difference between Thanos in the comics and Thanos in the films. It's a matter of his motivation. In the comics Thanos was in love with Mistress Death, the personification of Death, and he was prepared to do anything to win her love. This led to him killing half of the sentient beings in the universe. In the film Thanos has noble motives. He wants to solve the problem of overpopulation and the resulting poverty by removing half of the universe's population. It might sound twisted, but it's logical. If there isn't enough food to go round the problem can be solved immediately by killing half of the people.


In the comics it's Thanos' love for death that causes him to fail in his ambitions. This makes him a tragic character. In contrast, Thanos in the films is an eco-warrior.


Captain America returns with a beard. It doesn't suit him. He's a traditional old-fashioned sort of guy. The beard makes him look sort of cool. He's not cool.


Black Widow has changed her hair colour. Does this have any significance?


Iron Man looks the same as he always does.


Bruce Banner is unable to turn into the Hulk. That's possibly a mental block, because he was traumatised by spending two years as the Hulk in "Thor: Ragnarok". I would have liked to see the Hulk. If anything, Bruce Banner's futile attempts to become the Hulk are annoying.


Part of the battle is fought in Wakanda, so we see the Black Panther again.


We also see Okoye. Did I ever mention that I find her sexy?


But the film is all about Thanos. By the end of the film we're almost sympathising with him. He gives up the person he loves the most in order to save the universe. He's not quite the same Thanos that we know from the comics, but he's still a fascinating character.

I'll say something about Stan Lee's appearance before you think I've forgotten him. He's the driver of a New York school bus. The children start to panic when they see one of Thanos' space ships hovering over the city. Stan takes it in his stride, saying "Have you never seen a space ship before?"

Success Rate:  + 4.5

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Monday, 28 January 2019

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol 2 (5 Stars)


"There are two types of beings in the universe: those who dance, and those who do not".

This is the 15th film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, released in May 2017. It's a family drama of a different kind. Peter Quill, aka Star-Lord, has never met his biological father. This has been troubling him ever since he was abducted by Yondu's spaceship in 1988. Now he meets his father, and he finds out that his father is a planet. Only in Marvel films.....

Things don't run smoothly after he meets his Dad, who has the tell-tale name Ego. After initial mistrust Peter thinks they can live together forever, because Ego tells him he's inherited his immortality. Then Peter finds out that his Dad wants to destroy all life in the universe, apart from the two of them. Even his friends in the Guardians of the Galaxy will be snuffed out. That's not the sort of Dad I'd want to be with either.


You only have to look at his face to know he can't be trusted.


Ego takes on the form of David Hasselhoff to make Peter like him more. Is that really an improvement?


Does Ego look better as Kurt Russell? Yes, that's a friendly face that might win me over. Deceptively friendly.


But what about Stan Lee? In this film he appears in two different scenes, a 10-second scene in the middle of the film and a 17-second scene after the credits. Rather than being just another cameo it's a significant role. It ties together all of his MCU appearances. He's sitting on a rock in space talking to three Watchers. Do I really have to explain to you what Watchers are? They're one of the most highly advanced races in the universe, but they've sworn never to get involved in the affairs of lesser races. They just watch. They're scattered around the universe stationed at significant points of activity, although they leave their posts when something of importance is happening somewhere else. There's a Watcher who lives on the Moon called Uatu. He's a rebellious Watcher, because he loves the human race and repeatedly acts to protect humanity against attacks from alien races.

Stan Lee is sitting with the Watchers discussing things he's seen and done. We overhear him saying, "At that time I was a Federal Express Man", referring to his appearance in "Captain America: Civil War". That's interesting. Can we deduce from this that he's playing the same character in every film, someone who is gathering information for the Watchers? Let's not think about it too much, because there might be contradictions when we try to thread all his appearances together. It's just a humorous theory.


This film gets my vote for the best opening credits scene ever. While the names flash onto the screen, telling us who's in the film and who's worked on the film, Groot is dancing, oblivious to the fact that his team members in the Guardians of the Galaxy are fighting for their lives.


My recent reviews of the MCU films have been more like picture galleries than verbal descriptions, and I don't intend to change now. Here's a photo of Star-Lord, a character created by Steve Englehart in 1976. I was a big fan of Steve Englehart in the 1970's and owned most of the comics written by him, including Marvel Preview #4 featuring Star-Lord. Unfortunately my son Norman destroyed all my comics to make room in the cellar while I was in America. That was one of the most foolish things he's ever done. He could at least have sold them. My collection was worth at least $200,000 but probably closer to $500,000. My most valuable comic was a near mint copy of Giant-Size X-Men #1.

Star-Lord is played by the actor Chris Pratt, a real life gun nut. He says he owns 40 guns for home defence. Anyone who needs that many guns has serious problems.


This is Gamora, a character created by Jim Starlin in 1975. I also owned every comic he ever wrote for Marvel prior to 1997.


On the subject of guns, Gamora is the character in the film who carries the biggest gun. Size matters!


Don't you think that Gamora's gun looks like a severed male phallus?


Drax is a character created by Jim Starlin in 1973, but he's so unlike the comic book character that Jim wouldn't recognise him. The only thing that links him with the comics is his name.


Rocket was created by Bill Mantlo in 1973, but forgotten for more than 30 years before returning to comics in a slightly altered form.


Groot was created by Stan Lee in 1960 as a one-off character, but he was re-introduced in 2008 by Dan Abnett.

Those are all five members of the Guardians of the Galaxy, but I'll add one more photo.


Ayesha is loosely based on a character called Paragon, created by Len Wein in 1977. Very loosely. The Australian actress Elizabeth Debicki was picked for the role because a tall actress was needed, and she's 6'3". Wow! Does that make her the tallest actress in mainstream films?

Both Guardians of the Galaxy films are all about music. In the first film Peter Quill carried a Walkman with a mix tape given him by his mother. At the end of the film he finally opened a present given him by his mother, and it contained a second mix tape, the tape used in the second film. Neither of them are quite the mix tapes I would have made from the 1970's, but overall they're good mixes. I prefer the first mix tape.

Ego calls "Brandy" by Looking Glass the best pop song ever written. Tastes are different, I suppose. It's a song I heard when I was young and forgot until I watched the film. If it weren't for its prominence in the film I would have had no reason to ever think about it again. To me it's a cute song, pleasant background music with no lasting value. Here's the full text, which I'm quoting because of its relevance to the film.



Brandy by Looking Glass

There's a port on a western bay,
And it serves a hundred ships a day,
Lonely sailors pass the time away
And talk about their homes.

And there's a girl in this harbour town,
And she works laying whiskey down,
They say, "Brandy, fetch another round",
She serves them whiskey and wine.

The sailors say, "Brandy, you're a fine girl,
What a good wife you would be,
Yeah your eyes could steal a sailor from the sea".

Brandy wears a braided chain,
Made of finest silver from the North of Spain,
A locket that bears the name
Of a man that Brandy loved.

He came on a summer's day,
Bringing gifts from far away,
But he made it clear he couldn't stay,
No harbour was his home.

The sailor said, "Brandy, you're a fine girl,
What a good wife you would be,
But my life, my love and my lady is the sea".

Yeah, Brandy used to watch his eyes
When he told his sailor's story,
She could feel the ocean fall and rise
When she saw his raging glory,
But he had always told the truth,
Lord, he was an honest man,
And Brandy does her best to understand.

At night when the bars close down
Brandy walks through a silent town
And loves a man who's not around.
She still can hear him say,

She hears him say, "Brandy, you're a fine girl,
What a good wife you would be,
But my life, my love and my lady is the sea".

He said, "Brandy, you're a fine girl,
What a good wife you would be,
But my life, my love and my lady is the sea".

Success Rate:  + 2.3

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de