Showing posts with label Daniel Radcliffe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Daniel Radcliffe. Show all posts

Thursday, 2 June 2022

The Lost City (4 Stars)


Today's the first time I've been to the cinema since 10th April. Almost eight weeks without cinema visits. I've missed going to the cinema. Many people are happy sitting at home watching Netflix on their television, or worse still on their laptop, but not me. Seeing films on a big screen is an immersive experience that should be enjoyed as often as possible. My usual goal is twice a week, depending on what's being shown. Today's a special day, the end of my cinema abstinence, so I've planned two films back to back. This is the first.

Loretta Sage (Sandra Bullock) is a widowed romance novelist. She writes action stories that star an adventurer called Dash. A model called Alan Caprison (Channing Tatum) appears on the cover of her books portraying Dash. He accompanies her on a book tour, and she's shocked to find that her readers are more interested in him than the books. Have they only been buying the books for his picture on the cover? Possibly.

After the first stage of the book tour Loretta is kidnapped by a millionaire called Abigail Fairfax, played by Daniel Radcliffe. Yes, I thought Abigail was a woman's name as well. After reading Loretta's latest book, "The Lost City of D", he's recognised that the city described is based on researches carried out by Loretta's late husband, an archaeologist. He sends her to the remote island described in her book to search for hidden treasure.

Alan follows Loretta to the island to rescue her. Loretta's publisher, Beth Hatten (Davine Joy Randolph) also follows her in order to protect her investment. Loretta is her best selling author, even if the books are only being bought for the covers.

The film is a comedy with some slapstick action. A lot of humour is based on Alan Caprison's lack of intelligence, but at least he has a good heart. "The Lost City" isn't funny enough to make me laugh out loud, but it's still enjoyable.


The film's cast at the premiere: Patti Harrison, Daniel Radcliffe, Davine Joy Randolph and Sandra Bullock. Channing Tatum couldn't make it. Daniel (5'4") looks so tiny when he's surrounded by big women wearing high heels to make themselves look even bigger.

Monday, 14 March 2022

Imperium (4 Stars)


How long will it take for people to stop associating Daniel Radcliffe with Harry Potter? It was the Harry Potter films that made him famous as a teenager, but he's made so many good films since then. "Imperium" is one of them. He plays a young FBI agent who infiltrates right extremist groups. I say that in the plural, because he uses the visible groups as stepping stones to make contact with the hidden, more serious groups. The skinheads are just loud-mouthed idiots who run around town beating up foreigners and getting themselves arrested. The higher groups are made up of fine, genteel people that might be sitting next to you in church. They're intellectuals who make plans to incite a race war that will eradicate everyone in America that they consider unworthy.

I've written about "Imperium" in the past. If you know how to use my alphabetical list of posts you can find the reviews. Today I want to talk about a (semi) off topic subject.

I'm sure that anyone who watches modern films has noticed the vignettes inserted at the beginning of films. In the past (pre-1990) there was just the name of one studio, like Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, 20th Century Fox or Universal. Now several companies are listed, usually three or four per film. These are the production companies that invested in the film. Some of the bigger companies take an active role in the making of the film, looking over the producer and director's shoulders. The smaller companies just hand over their money and sit back, waiting to see what happens. Some production companies are formed just for one film. For instance, the film "Upside Down", which I watched two days ago, was supported by TMG (Tele München Group), Concorde and Upside Down Films.

The big blockbusters are still financed by a single studio. When it comes to smaller films, would-be directors and screenwriters run around trying to get support for their projects. As a rule of thumb, the more vignettes are shown at the beginning of a film, the less it was expected that a film would make money. No single production company expected the film to make a profit enough to finance the film, so several companies made a smaller donation to the budget. As I said above, three or four production companies is a usual number. But what's the film that used the most production companies?

I have two films in my Blu-ray collection which have a noticeably large number of production companies. "Imperium" is one of them. I'll watch the other tomorrow, so I can see which has the most. "Imperium" has seven production companies.








The order of the companies isn't random. The company that invests the most money is put first.

As a rule of thumb, a film has to earn double its budget at the box office to make a profit. That's the figure I use to calculate the Success Rate at the bottom of most of my film reviews. If the Success Rate is positive it's made a profit, if it's negative it's made a loss. If the Success Rate is missing from a post, it's either because it's a new film (still in the cinema) or I don't have the details.

One thing missing from my Success Rate is disc sales. Some films do badly in the cinema, but a large number of DVDs are sold. I can't use this in the calculation, because exact sales figures are rarely published. One example is "Donnie Darko", a box office flop with a Success Rate of -0.3. It became popular after being released on DVD, earning another $10 million (estimated), which would push its Success Rate up to 1.9.

I can't calculate the Success Rate for "Imperium" because I don't have the details. All I can say for certain is that it made a loss at the box office. Maybe it earned money from disc sales. I don't know.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Sunday, 30 January 2022

Kill your Darlings (4 Stars)



Name: Allen Ginsberg
Lived: 3 June 1926 – 5 April 1997
Film dates: 1943 to 1945
Film made in 2013

"Like all lovers and bad people, I am a poet".

This quote from the film is interesting. I noticed today for the first time that the English subtitles are different to the spoken text. In the subtitles the words are "like all lovers and sad people", and this is the quote listed in IMDB's quote section. I can guarantee you, Daniel Radcliffe says "bad people". It seems like he blundered, but I like the quote the way he spoke it.

"Kill your Darlings" is about Allen Ginsberg's formative years at university. He studied Literature at Columbia University, but he was expelled before graduating. (Note: he was re-admitted to Columbia University a year later, after the events of the film).

The main purpose of the film is to show Allen's relationship with his best friend, Lucien Carr. Lucien was a rebel, as far as literature was concerned. He wanted the banned books of the day to become compulsory reading at university. Lucien encouraged Allen to share his rebellion. The problem is, Lucien was a poor student with no writing abilities. He only had good grades because a former university professor, David Kammerer, wrote his essays for him. David and Lucien had been lovers, and now David was stalking him, working as the university janitor so he could be close to him. Lucien rejected his advances as a lover, but he still profited from David's help with his essays.

The film ends with Lucien killing David. Allen writes a defence for Lucien, which Lucien rejects. Then Allen submits the defence as his end of term paper. He's warned that if he doesn't retract the paper he'll be expelled, but he refuses to back down. The problem is that the essay dealt with the subject of homosexuality, which was a taboo subject at university.


Today is the third time that I watched the film. I can't say that it helps me understand Allen Ginsberg any better than I already knew him from his poetry, but it gives me a fascinating insight into American university life in the 1950's. I wish I'd been there. I wouldn't have been a rebel, but I would have enjoyed sitting on the sidelines watching the rebellion.

Success Rate:  - 3.5

Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Monday, 29 June 2020

Guns Akimbo (4½ Stars)


Daniel Radcliffe plays Miles Lee Harris, a computer programmer trapped in a boring job writing code for a computer game about a squirrel that steals money. Wow! And I always thought programming computer games would be fun. In the evening he sits alone playing computer games that really are fun. He comes across Skizm, a game that looks real. He joins the chat and begins to insult the other people he's talking to. He's a troll, in the real sense of the word: a person who makes provocative statements online just to get a reaction.

The Skizm administrator enters the chat and tells Miles he knows his IP address. Later that night people break into his apartment and knock him out. When he finally wakes up he finds that guns have been bolted to his hands. He can't put them down. He's told that he has to prove he's a big man by playing Skizm for a day. He has 24 hours to kill Nix, the game's reigning champion. In parallel, Nix has been told by the game admin that if she kills Miles within 24 hours she can leave the game.

Miles can't dress himself without the use of his hands, so he stumbles into the street wearing his underpants, a bathrobe and a pair of slippers. Nix is already tracking him. He should have left his mobile phone at home. There are drones filming everything Miles and Nix are doing, streaming it live to the Internet. Soon there are millions of people watching. Most are cheering for Nix, as the popular champion, but as Miles manages to survive, more by luck than by skill, his popularity begins to rise.

This is an absolutely ridiculous film. It's difficult to take it seriously at all. Nevertheless, it's packed with so much action that it's more than just a comedy. Once we've suspended disbelief and have accepted the premise of a real life killing game, we're cheering for Miles.

Daniel Radcliffe is a fantastic actor. Whatever he touches turns to gold. How did he get from Harry Potter to here? Did he have innate acting skill that the casting directors recognised before the first film, or was he rigorously trained in between films for 10 years? Either way, he's become an amazing actor, and he has a long, successful career ahead of him.

Saturday, 21 July 2018

Imperium (4 Stars)


Despite its critical acclaim this film was a box office flop. Most cinemas didn't even want to show it. Why not? It's about racism in the USA, which is an unpleasant subject matter, but other films about racism have been more successful. I think that the reason for this film's failure is the way that racism is presented. It doesn't show racism the way people want to see it.

Daniel Radcliffe plays Nate Foster, a quiet young FBI agent who's assigned the task of going undercover in white power organisations. He's picked for the task over all his older more experienced colleagues because he can understand the people he deals with. Nate doesn't just rush in with guns blazing shouting "Racism is wrong". He sits down with racists and tries to understand why they think the way they do. That's also the intention of the film. It wants to help the viewer to understand why racists are racists. That's too much like hard work for the typical anti-racist. It's easier to go to an anti-racism demonstration and throw bricks at racists.

"Imperium" shows that not all racists are the same. Different groups are presented. There are the skinhead thugs that we associate with racism. They're loud-mouthed and brash and get the most publicity. There are also Christian groups that use their religion as justification for being anti-black and anti-Jewish. These groups don't necessarily get on with one another. Then there are the polite intellectuals who sit at home listening to classical music and invite their friends round to discuss the inferiority of other races. The film's message is clear: it's this last group which is the most dangerous. You might have a next-door neighbour who fits into this category, but you would never suspect him of being racist because he's such a nice person. These people aren't seen on the streets demonstrating, not even in peaceful protests. Violent anti-racist or anti-fascist demonstrations just persuade them that they're correct.

One small digression: today the terms fascism and racism are often used as synonyms. There's a lot of overlap, because fascists are usually racists, but not all racists are fascists. Racism is just what the word says: the prejudice against other races, usually identified by skin colours. Fascism is based on three principles: nationalism, dictatorship and government control. Apart from that, the word "fascist" is often used as an insult by people who don't even know what it means.

Understanding racism doesn't mean agreeing with racism. I would go as far as to say that if you oppose something that you don't understand you're an extremist yourself, no better than the ones you're opposing.

Order from Amazon.com
Order from Amazon.co.uk
Order from Amazon.de

Monday, 11 September 2017

Jungle (4½ Stars)


This is the 20th film in the Stuttgart Fantasy Film Festival.

There were two films that I was especially anxious to see at this year's Fantasy Film Festival. The first was "IT", and the second is "Jungle".

This is a true story that takes place in Bolivia in 1981. On his trip through South America, young globetrotter Yossi (Daniel Radcliffe) meets the two like-minded adventurers, Kevin and Marcus. From strangers to friends, the three travel deep to the heart of the green continent. A chance meeting finally sends them on an expedition to still undiscovered parts of the sheer endless rainforest where things take a sudden dramatic turn for the worse. The ordeals of the hike take larger tolls on Marcus than expected, and the raft ride on the seemingly calm river becomes a hell-ride through whirls and rocks. However, for Yossi’s unpleasantly skin-crawling survival trip through the green hell, this is only the beginning.

Daniel Radcliffe puts on an amazing performance, worthy of winning his first Oscar. The only possible hindrance is that the film could be accused of copying "The Revenant", but I can guarantee you that Daniel Radcliffe is more convincing in the role of a stranded adventurer than Leonardo DiCaprio. Thomas Kretschmann is also outstanding as the tour guide.

Several people that I talked to called this the best film of the festival so far. Let's wait and see how the film is received when it goes on general release in the awards season at the end of the year.

Tuesday, 25 October 2016

Swiss Army Man (4 Stars)


I went to see this film at the Metropol cinema in Stuttgart today. It's fortunate that I live in Germany, as far as films go. This is the second Daniel Radcliffe film in a row that's been boycotted by UK cinemas. The first was "Imperium". Maybe people who lived in London had a chance to see them, but my friends who live in the tiny little town Birmingham missed out on these two films, each remarkable in its own way.

The film starts with a man on a deserted island. He calls himself  Hank, although as we later find out that's not his real name. It's not clear how long he's been there, but he's in a state of depression. He's about to hang himself when he sees a corpse washed up on the beach. He tries to revive the corpse by giving it the kiss of life, but it's too late. When the corpse farts Hank thinks that there's some life left in it, so he takes the corpse back to the beach and they become friends.

Note: I did some research on the subject, and corpses really do fart, especially if they've been in the water.

This is a buddy movie of a different kind. Two men bond after meeting under extreme circumstances. The only problem is that one man is alive and the other is dead. Hank talks to the corpse as he carries him around the island. After a while the corpse talks back and introduces himself as Manny. It's not giving anything away to say that the corpse is only talking in Hank's imagination. Hank sees Manny as only half dead and thinks he can reanimate him by encouraging him to talk about his previous life. Hank even dresses as a woman whose photo he finds on Manny's mobile phone and teaches Manny how to flirt with her.

It's a ridiculous comedy, but it does have a serious side. Hank and Manny engage in conversations about the meaning of life, raising many important questions. Towards the end of the film there are some surprises, i.e. plot twists, that tell the audience that things weren't exactly as Hank portrayed them in his conversations. Was he imagining them, in the same way that he saw Manny as alive, or deliberately lying to his new friend? That's not certain. Watch it for yourself and make up your own mind.


I still haven't decided what I think about Paul Dano as an actor. He's been in a few films, but the first time I paid attention to him was in his role as Brian Wilson in "Love & Mercy", one of the best films of 2015. It's not easy to judge him on his goofy role as Hank in "Swiss Army Man". I'll watch out for him in the future. If anything, the best actor in this film is Daniel Radcliffe, especially in the scenes where he isn't talking and he's only a corpse.

Sunday, 11 September 2016

Imperium (4 Stars)


Daniel Radcliffe stars as Nate Foster, a young FBI agent in Washington, DC. Four barrels of Caesium-137 have been stolen and the FBI fears a terror attack is imminent. Most of the FBI believes that radical Moslems will attack, but one lone voice, agent Angela Zamparo, suspects that the stolen material is in the possession of right wing extremists. The main suspect is Dallas Wolf, the code name of an unknown man who posts audio broadcasts on the Internet each night. He seems to be promoting a race war that has the goal of removing Jews, blacks and Hispanics from the USA.

Nate is sent undercover, disguised as a skinhead, to get close to Dallas Wolf. He finds out that something big is happening. Different white power groups are meeting to form an alliance. Nate's first contact is with other skinheads, rowdy thugs who beat up blacks just because they look different. But there are others. The Aryan Alliance is a Christian group which incorporates religion into their fanaticism. Then there are intellectual groups that have come to white supremacy through reading books. They're polite well-mannered people who sit sipping tea and eating cupcakes. We also see the Ku Klux Klan, who seem to prefer brash displays of unity to taking action against their enemies. Each group is critical of the others, but they're united by their belief in white supremacy.


Unlike other films about white power, such as "American History X" and "Green Room", "Imperium" doesn't attempt to lecture the viewer on the evils of extremism. It assumes that the viewer already knows that white power movements are wrong. Instead, the film attempts to help us understand the different movements. It's true, the skinheads are completely revolting, but the members of the other groups are presented as human beings with strengths and weaknesses, people we can relate to. Racists aren't just dim-witted lunatics, they're also university graduates.


This is a thought-provoking film which I strongly recommend. Daniel Radcliffe puts on an amazing performance as a young man gets drawn ever deeper into a world that he hates.

Wednesday, 8 June 2016

Trainwreck (4 Stars)


Everybody's left a dog in a hot car at some point in their lives.

I can't think of anything to say about this film that I didn't already write in my original review. Amy Schumer is a genius. If this is supposed to be a trainwreck I want to jump on a train with her and break all the speed limits.


P. S. I've never left a dog in a hot car. Not literally, anyway. I need to think about how I can apply that to my life.

Wednesday, 13 January 2016

Kill your Darlings (4 Stars)


This is a film about the events that led up to the murder of David Kammerer by Lucien Carr on August 13th, 1944. It's based on the book "And the hippos were boiled in their tanks", co-written by William Burroughs and Jack Kerouac in 1945, but not published until 2008 after Carr's death. Burroughs and Kerouac were both closely acquainted with the case, because Carr confessed to them immediately after the murder, but he used lies in his defence in court, so Burroughs decided to keep the truth secret for as long as possible.

William Burroughs (Ben Foster) and David Kammerer (Michael C. Hall) were childhood friends. Kammerer was working as a university English professor when he met Lucien Carr (Dale DeHaan), who was only 14 at the time. The two became lovers. Lucien's mother attempted to separate them by moving around the country, but wherever they went Lucien contacted Kammerer, and they met at the new place. The film begins in 1943, when Lucien was 18, studying English Literature at Columbia University in New York. Lucien wasn't very good at his studies and was in danger of failing, but he had help. David Kammerer was working as a janitor in the university just to be close to Lucien, and he was writing his papers for him.

At first this situation went well, but then it became too much for Lucien. He began to have feelings for boys his own age, including Allen Ginsberg (Daniel Radcliffe). Lucien was a user. He didn't break up with Kammerer until Allen promised to take over as the one who would write his university papers. Kammerer wasn't happy, and he continued to pursue Lucien. Eventually Lucien attacked Kammerer with a knife, then tied him up and threw him in the river while he was still alive.

Lucien's defence was that the killing was an honor slaying. The legal definition is as follows:

Honor Slaying: Relating to a lethal attack committed when the accused is defending himself against a known homosexual. If the accused is a heterosexual, he shall be pardoned. But if the accused is a homosexual, the charge of murder in the first degree shall stand.

This doesn't refer to killing someone in self-defence against a violent attack. The words "defending himself" refer to preventing sexual advances from a homosexual. What it means, effectively, is that a heterosexual is allowed to kill a homosexual who touches him in a sexual manner. If a homosexual is touched by another homosexual he isn't allowed to kill him.

The law was really biased against homosexuals in 1944, wasn't it? In actual fact, Kammerer didn't even make sexual advances on the night of his death. It was a premeditated murder by Lucien Carr. He merely invented the sexual assault story as a defence. There were no witnesses to the murder itself, but Kammerer was known to be homosexual. Lucien was homosexual, of course, but he denied this in court, and there were no witnesses to contradict him.

Lucien Carr had to go to prison for 18 months. For the rest of his life he pretended to be heterosexual and stuck to his story that David Kammerer was pursuing him against his will. Only his closest friends knew the truth, and they kept quiet.

Dale DeHaan as Lucien Carr

Michael C. Hall as David Kammerer

The film is also Allen Ginsberg's story. I can relate to him. He was a good, hard-working boy. When he went to university he met and admired wild, unruly boys, in particular Lucien Carr. He wanted to be like them. That was just like me when I went to university. At school I had always studied hard and only allowed myself a limited social life. When I went to university I saw the other students drinking and partying, so I wanted to be like them. I pretended to be like them, and I was accepted into their circles, but inside I still felt like an outsider. They accepted me more than I accepted them. Allen Ginsberg went a step further than me. He became one with the rebellion, and eventually he was expelled from university. In his case there was the additional issue that at university he realised for the first time that he was homosexual, so he associated with other students who had the same sexuality as himself.

Daniel Radcliffe as Allen Ginsberg

Ben Foster as William Burroughs

The acting is superb throughout. Michael C. Hall is a lovesick fool who has given up everything to be with the boy he loves, even though their relationship was illegal. Dale DeHaan is a rebellious teenager confused by his own sexuality. Daniel Radcliffe is an innocent, not quite sure if he should side with the establishment or the rebels, but eventually picking the latter. Ben Foster is a mysterious character, wandering around quoting poetry, relying on drugs to make himself happy, outwardly friendly with Allen and Lucien but inwardly detached.

Monday, 7 December 2015

Victor Frankenstein (4½ Stars)


Before going to see this film I was warned that it wasn't very good, according to the reviews of the clever film critics who know everything. This is probably the reason why hardly anyone from my film club went to see it. There were just two of us sitting together. And guess what? We both loved it! I've said it before, and I'll probably say it again: don't trust the critics! Go to see films yourself and make up your own mind.

The film is an exciting adventure story that deviates strongly from Mary Shelley's novel and the previous Frankenstein films, but it's close enough to remind us of what's gone before, especially the 1930's films made in America by Universal Studios. It's carried by the magnificent acting of the main characters, James McAvoy as Victor Frankenstein and Daniel Radcliffe as Igor.

The biggest difference from previous stories is that Igor isn't a dim-witted hunchback, he's an equal partner in the creation of the monster. Despite the name of the film, Igor is the main character, and the whole film is told from his perspective.

The film is set in London in the late 19th Century. Igor is a clown who has grown up in a circus. When he's not performing he reads medical books. Victor Frankenstein, who is an undergraduate student, not a doctor or a baron, recognises Igor's brilliance and takes him away from the circus. Together they work to create a living human being from dead tissue. Of the two, Igor is the cool-thinking sane person who sees and understands the consequences of their actions. Victor is the madman who wants to create life as if he were God. "There is no Satan, no God, only humanity, only me".

It's difficult for me to understand why the reviews are so bad. Maybe it's because "Victor Frankenstein" is so unlike the films that have gone before. This is a very enjoyable film that I'm sure I shall watch again and again.


There was some excitement going on at the cinema away from the screen. The film finished at five past six. As we were walking out a member of the cinema staff rushed in and told us that we should leave the building quickly because there was a fire next door. It wasn't just us who had been watching "Victor Frankenstein", everyone had to leave, even those who were in the middle of their films. Cineworld has 12 screens. When I got outside the fire was already under control. The fire brigade was extinguishing the last few flames. The fire wasn't next door, it was the same building, but the fire was above ground. One of the signs on the outside of the building had burst into flames, causing the metal above it to buckle and fall to the ground. The fire wasn't as bad as the photo makes it look. Nobody was harmed, and there was never any danger to anyone who wasn't standing directly below the sign.

Monday, 24 August 2015

Trainwreck (4½ Stars)


This is one of the funniest films I've seen for a long time. It's a romantic comedy that follows the pre-defined rules of rom-coms, but the comedy element is in the foreground. It's a romantic comedy with a small R and a capital C. It was written by Amy Schumer, who also has the lead role. The character in the film is called Amy, which points to the fact that she's playing herself, as far as the personality is concerned.

Amy is a writer for a magazine called S'Nuff. Please don't forget the apostrophe. She leads a promiscuous lifestyle, because she believes that monogamy is unnatural. Her preference is for big strong men, all muscle and no brains. She has a selfish attitude to sex. She likes men to go down on her, but afterwards she often pretends to fall asleep, because giving a man pleasure bores her. Even if she does have intercourse with a man it's her rule that they don't spend the night together. No romance after the sex is over, it's not allowed.

Of course, like in the classical German Novellas, there has to be a turning point, leading to a chain of events over which the protagonists have no power. Amy has to interview a sports doctor for her magazine. He's not like the men she usually dates. He's intelligent and has a smaller build, but she falls in love with him. Of course, she doesn't use the L word, because she's in denial, but the audience knows it's love.

I would probably have given the film five stars if the doctor, played by Bill Hader, weren't such a dull character. I realise this is deliberate, a straight man as a contrast for Amy's comedy antics, but I think it's overdone. Bill could have played the role with a bit more spice.

Amy, on the other hand, is brilliant. I'd never even heard of her until recently, when she created a scandal by posing as Princess Leia in a photo shoot for GQ magazine. This was done without permission from Disney, the company which owns Star Wars, and possibly makes the magazine guilty of copyright infringements. That's a question for lawyers to decide.


Another recent incident was the red carpet at the Time 100 Gala, where Amy Schumer deliberately fell over in front of Kanye West, the "greatest living rock star on the planet". The photo says it all. Everyone in the room was laughing. Even Kim Kardashian cracked a smile. Only Kanye kept a straight face. If he had laughed with everyone else he would have retained his pride, but by being the only person in the room with a glum face it made him look like a fool.


Also worth mentioning is John Cena, better known as a WWE wrestler. Did Amy write the role of her boyfriend Steven with him in mind? I suspect so. He's a very intelligent, articulate man in real life, but in the film he's the complete opposite, a stupid person incapable of putting words together to make appropriate sentences in any situation.

Then there's the film within a film, starring Daniel Radcliffe as the Dog Walker. I hope this mini-film will be available as an extra feature on the Blu-ray.


P. S. I've repeated the rules of romantic comedies so often, but here they are once more for anyone who's too lazy to search my old posts:
  1. Girl meets boy.
  2. The girl doesn't like the boy, but as time goes on she grows to like him.
  3. Girl and boy go different ways. (Sometimes geographically, sometimes she returns to an ex-lover).
  4. Girl realises she can't live without the boy and returns to him.
Don't make me repeat myself again!

Thursday, 6 November 2014

Horns (3½ Stars)


People say you should do the right thing, but sometimes there is no right thing, so you have to pick a sin you can live with.

This is a low key black comedy. It starts off the same way as "Gone Girl". Ignatius Perrish's girlfriend Merrin has been killed, and he is the main suspect, hounded by television crews and neighbours. That's where the similarity between the two films ends. In "Gone Girl" the main character is motivated by the desire to clear his name, whereas Ignatius is consumed by a desire for revenge. He wants to kill whoever has taken his girlfriend from him. His negative emotions pull him over to the dark side. Horns sprout from his head, and he begins to have a profound effect on the people around him. His friends and acquaintances reveal their evil tendencies that they usually keep hidden. It's not that they have become evil, the evil was always there, but they lose their self control and let it out. As well as that, Ignatius finds that when he suggests evil deeds to people they do them.

As Ignatius continues his investigations into his girlfriend's death his appearance becomes ever darker. Snakes accompany him wherever he goes. On the one hand he's shocked by the evil forces overwhelming him, but he's prepared to use them in his quest for revenge.

It isn't really a horror film. It's not scary. The demonic aspects of the film made me laugh. It's difficult to say whether I enjoyed it or not. It wasn't at all what I expected. I expected more horror, or at least more suspense. The film is a curiosity that I need to see again before I make my mind up. The one thing that I can say for certain is that I'm very impressed by Daniel Radcliffe's acting abilities. I expected him to disappear after the Harry Potter films, but now it looks like he'll be with us for years to come.

Monday, 1 September 2014

What if? (4 Stars)


This film was released in America as "The F Word". I prefer the English film title, because the smirks raised by the American title are unnecessary. Yes, the F word that the title refers to is "friends", but the fewest people would draw that connection before seeing the film. On the other hand, "What if?" says absolutely nothing as a title to someone who doesn't already know what the film is about, so both titles seem somehow wrong. How about "Let's be friends" or "Just friends"?

The film takes place in Toronto. A young man called Wallace (Daniel Radcliffe) has moved to Canada to study medicine, but after breaking up with his girlfriend he dropped out and is now doing a boring job writing technical manuals. At a party he meets Chantry (Zoe Kazan), a young woman who works in film animation, a job that she greatly enjoys. The two immediately hit it off, due to a multitude of common interests, but there's a problem: she has a boyfriend that she's been living with for five years. The two agree to be "just friends", even though Wallace wants more. Wallace confesses his feelings to his best friend Alan (Adam Driver), who happens to be Chantry's cousin. At first Alan tries to dissuade Wallace from making a move, but as time goes by he attempts to push the two together, much to Wallace's dismay.

Chantry's boyfriend, Ben, has a highly important job at the United Nations, mediating for international agreements. The job takes him to Dublin for six months. During this time Wallace and Chantry see even more of one another. Will they remain friends or shift into a relationship? I think that everyone who has ever seen a romantic comedy knows the answer from the beginning of the film, but the predictability doesn't spoil it at all. When the expected finally happened I had tears in my eyes, it was so moving.

As a romantic comedy the film doesn't keep exactly to the rules of the genre, but it remains close to them. For those who don't know how romantic comedies work, they have the tightest, most repetitive rules of any film genre:
  1. Girl meets boy.
  2. The girl doesn't like the boy, but as time goes on she grows to like him.
  3. Girl and boy go different ways. (Sometimes geographically, sometimes she returns to an ex-lover).
  4. Girl realises she can't live without the boy and returns to him.
The film is carried by the high quality of the acting. Daniel Radcliffe never ceases to surprise me. I expected him to fade away after the Harry Potter films, but he has considerable acting talents. Zoe Kazan, an actress that I hardly know, puts on an impressive performance. It's amazing how young she looks. She's 30, but doesn't look a day over 16. After seeing Adam Driver in "Tracks" I knew immediately that he has a big career ahead of him. Watch out for him in the future. Jemima Rooper is also noteworthy in her small role as Wallace's sister. With a cast like this the film couldn't possibly go wrong.

If you go to see this in the cinema, please don't leave when the credits start. During the credits the story is continued in an animated sequence. Don't walk out too soon or you'll miss it.

Saturday, 15 February 2014

The Woman in Black (4 Stars)


I'm reviewing the 2012 version of this film starring Daniel Radcliffe as Arthur Kipps. My guest writer Con already reviewed it here. I still haven't seen the original version, so I'll judge it on its own merits.

The London lawyer Arthur Kipps is sent to the town Crythin Gifford in the far north of England to deal with the estate of Alice Drablow, a woman who has recently died. He is told by the locals that nobody will buy her house because they think it's haunted. Arthur doesn't believe in the supernatural and dismisses the stories, but when he's there he sees a mysterious woman in black clothing wandering in the grounds, and sometimes even inside the house. Soon after his arrival mysterious deaths occur. He remains in the town, not just to do his job but also to solve the mystery.

This is one of the new Hammer horror films that have been recently released, and will hopefully continue to be released. I have to say then, with some shame, that the film has never been released in England in its original form. The BBFC (British Board of Film Classification) originally gave the film a 15 certificate, so the studios cut 82 seconds from the film in order for it to be given a 12 certificate. (Some reports say only 6 seconds were cut, while 76 seconds were darkened to hide details). The censored version is what was shown in the theatres and released on DVD in the UK. That's disgusting. Ironically, even after the cuts were made there were many complaints from parents who thought the film unsuitable for 12-year-olds. It was necessary for me to buy the film from Germany, where the film has been released uncut with a 16 certificate.

This is selling out at its lowest level. I don't blame the BBFC. They have their guidelines, and even if I don't always agree with the decisions they make, they're only doing their jobs. I am opposed to film studios dumbing down a film just to increase the box office takings by allowing younger visitors. They should be ashamed of themselves, sacrificing art for the sake of money.

I don't know whether any cuts were made to the American version. Can anyone tell me?

Tuesday, 17 December 2013

Kill your Darlings (4 Stars)


This is a film that I knew from the start I had to see. I discovered Allen Ginsberg's poetry while I was at university. His books were printed in small black paperback editions, square instead of rectangular, and they used to fit easily into my coat pockets. They made good reading during my bus rides to and from university. I read his books over and over again until they were worn out. I remember annoying at least one of my girlfriends by quoting Ginsberg at her.

I went into "Kill your Darlings" with false expectations. I thought it would be the true story of Allen Ginsberg's early years. In fact, it's only the story of his very early years, from 1943 to 1945, before he began to write the poetry that I loved so much. During these two years he studied at Columbia University. Arguably these were his formative years. He became close friends with a fellow literature student called Lucien Carr. Lucien inspired Allen to reject conventional poetry and try to write something revolutionary. When the film starts we get the impression that Lucien is a budding poet in his own right, but as the film progresses we see that he has no poetic talent or even any academic skills. Lucien's university papers are being written by his gay lover, David Kammerer, a former university professor who has taken a job as Columbia University's janitor in order to be close to Lucien.

The situation comes to a head when Lucien finds a new lover, the poet Jack Kerouac, and wants to break off his relationship with Dave. Together with Jack Lucien decides to join the U.S. Navy, but in the night before he enlists Dave tries to persuade him to stay, and Lucien murders him. The 1940's were dark days for justice in America. Lucien claimed that he was a heterosexual who was being unwillingly stalked by a homosexual man, so he was only sentenced to 18 months in prison. After all, by killing a gay man he was doing the world a favour.

The film concentrates on the friendship between Allen Ginsberg and Lucien Carr. Daniel Radcliffe and Dane DeHaan bring these characters to life. Michael C. Hall, best known for his role as the television psychopath Dexter, puts on a superb performance as David Kammerer, ably portraying him as a lovestruck fool. I was somewhat confused by William Burroughs in the film, played by Ben Foster. It was unclear to me why he was hovering around the university library. I know him as a poet and author, of course, but what was he doing at the time of the film, apart from experimenting with drugs and exerting subversive influences on young students?

Allen Ginsberg
June 3, 1926 – April 5, 1997



Howl Part 1, by Allen Ginsberg

I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked,

dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix,

angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the machinery of night,

who poverty and tatters and hollow-eyed and high sat up smoking in the supernatural darkness of cold-water flats floating across the tops of cities contemplating jazz,

who bared their brains to Heaven under the El and saw Mohammedan angels staggering on tenement roofs illuminated,

who passed through universities with radiant cool eyes hallucinating Arkansas and Blake-light tragedy among the scholars of war,

who were expelled from the academies for crazy & publishing obscene odes on the windows of the skull,

who cowered in unshaven rooms in underwear, burning their money in wastebaskets and listening to the Terror through the wall,

who got busted in their pubic beards returning through Laredo with a belt of marijuana for New York,

who ate fire in paint hotels or drank turpentine in Paradise Alley, death, or purgatoried their torsos night after night

with dreams, with drugs, with waking nightmares, alcohol and cock and endless balls,

incomparable blind streets of shuddering cloud and lightning in the mind leaping toward poles of Canada & Paterson, illuminating all the motionless world of Time between,

Peyote solidities of halls, backyard green tree cemetery dawns, wine drunkenness over the rooftops, storefront boroughs of teahead joyride neon blinking traffic light, sun and moon and tree vibrations in the roaring winter dusks of Brooklyn, ashcan rantings and kind king light of mind,

who chained themselves to subways for the endless ride from Battery to holy Bronx on benzedrine until the noise of wheels and children brought them down shuddering mouth-wracked and battered bleak of brain all drained of brilliance in the drear light of Zoo,

who sank all night in submarine light of Bickford's floated out and sat through the stale beer afternoon in desolate Fugazzi's, listening to the crack of doom on the hydrogen jukebox,

who talked continuously seventy hours from park to pad to bar to Bellevue to museum to the Brooklyn Bridge,

a lost battalion of platonic conversationalists jumping down the stoops off fire escapes off windowsills of Empire State out of the moon,

yacketayakking screaming vomiting whispering facts and memories and anecdotes and eyeball kicks and shocks of hospitals and jails and wars,

whole intellects disgorged in total recall for seven days and nights with brilliant eyes, meat for the Synagogue cast on the pavement,

who vanished into nowhere Zen New Jersey leaving a trail of ambiguous picture postcards of Atlantic City Hall,

suffering Eastern sweats and Tangerian bone-grindings and migraines of China under junk-withdrawal in Newark's bleak furnished room,

who wandered around and around at midnight in the railroad yard wondering where to go, and went, leaving no broken hearts,

who lit cigarettes in boxcars boxcars boxcars racketing through snow toward lonesome farms in grandfather night,

who studied Plotinus Poe St. John of the Cross telepathy and bop kabbalah because the cosmos instinctively vibrated at their feet in Kansas,

who loned it through the streets of Idaho seeking visionary indian angels who were visionary Indian angels,

who thought they were only mad when Baltimore gleamed in supernatural ecstasy,

who jumped in limousines with the Chinaman of Oklahoma on the impulse of winter midnight streetlight smalltown rain,

who lounged hungry and lonesome through Houston seeking jazz or sex or soup, and followed the brilliant Spaniard to converse about America and Eternity, a hopeless task, and so took ship to Africa,

who disappeared into the volcanoes of Mexico leaving behind nothing but the shadow of dungarees and the lava and ash of poetry scattered in fireplace Chicago,

who reappeared on the West Coast investigating the FBI in beards and shorts with big pacifist eyes sexy in their dark skin passing out incomprehensible leaflets,

who burned cigarette holes in their arms protesting the narcotic tobacco haze of Capitalism,

who distributed Supercommunist pamphlets in Union Square weeping and undressing while the sirens of Los Alamos wailed them down, and wailed down Wall, and the Staten Island ferry also wailed,

who broke down crying in white gymnasiums naked and trembling before the machinery of other skeletons,

who bit detectives in the neck and shrieked with delight in policecars for committing no crime but their own wild cooking pederasty and intoxication,

who howled on their knees in the subway and were dragged off the roof waving genitals and manuscripts,

who let themselves be fucked in the ass by saintly motorcyclists, and screamed with joy,

who blew and were blown by those human seraphim, the sailors, caresses of Atlantic and Caribbean love,

who balled in the morning in the evenings in rosegardens and the grass of public parks and cemeteries scattering their semen freely to whomever come who may,

who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob behind a partition in a Turkish Bath when the blond & naked angel came to pierce them with a sword,

who lost their loveboys to the three old shrews of fate the one eyed shrew of the heterosexual dollar the one eyed shrew that winks out of the womb and the one eyed shrew that does nothing but sit on her ass and snip the intellectual golden threads of the craftsman's loom.

who copulated ecstatic and insatiate with a bottle of beer a sweetheart a package of cigarettes a candle and fell off the bed, and continued along the floor and down the hall and ended fainting on the wall with a vision of ultimate cunt and come eluding the last gyzym of consciousness,

who sweetened the snatches of a million girls trembling in the sunset, and were red eyed in the morning but prepared to sweeten the snatch of the sunrise, flashing buttocks under barns and naked in the lake,

who went out whoring through Colorado in myriad stolen night-cars, N.C., secret hero of these poems, cocksman and Adonis of Denver -- joy to the memory of his innumerable lays of girls in empty lots & diner backyards, moviehouses' rickety rows, on mountaintops in caves or with gaunt waitresses in familiar roadside lonely petticoat upliftings & especially secret gas-station solipsisms of johns, & hometown alleys too,

who faded out in vast sordid movies, were shifted in dreams, woke on a sudden Manhattan, and picked themselves up out of basements hungover with heartless Tokay and horrors of Third Avenue iron dreams & stumbled to unemployment offices,

who walked all night with their shoes full of blood on the snowbank docks waiting for a door in the East River to open to a room full of steamheat and opium,

who created great suicidal dramas on the apartment cliff-banks of the Hudson under the wartime blue floodlight of the moon & their heads shall be crowned with laurel in oblivion,

who ate the lamb stew of the imagination or digested the crab at the muddy bottom of the rivers of Bowery,

who wept at the romance of the streets with their pushcarts full of onions and bad music,

who sat in boxes breathing in the darkness under the bridge, and rose up to build harpsichords in their lofts,

who coughed on the sixth floor of Harlem crowned with flame under the tubercular sky surrounded by orange crates of theology,

who scribbled all night rocking and rolling over lofty incantations which in the yellow morning were stanzas of gibberish,

who cooked rotten animals lung heart feet tail borsht & tortillas dreaming of the pure vegetable kingdom,

who plunged themselves under meat trucks looking for an egg,

who threw their watches off the roof to cast their ballot for Eternity outside of Time, & alarm clocks fell on their heads every day for the next decade,

who cut their wrists three times successively unsuccessfully, gave up and were forced to open antique stores where they thought they were growing old and cried,

who were burned alive in their innocent flannel suits on Madison Avenue amid blasts of leaden verse & the tanked-up clatter of the iron regiments of fashion & the nitroglycerine shrieks of the fairies of advertising & the mustard gas of sinister intelligent editors, or were run down by the drunken taxicabs of Absolute Reality,

who jumped off the Brooklyn Bridge this actually happened and walked away unknown and forgotten into the ghostly daze of Chinatown soup alleyways & firetrucks, not even one free beer,

who sang out of their windows in despair, fell out of the subway window, jumped in the filthy Passaic, leaped on negroes, cried all over the street, danced on broken wineglasses barefoot smashed phonograph records of nostalgic European 1930's German jazz finished the whiskey and threw up groaning into the bloody toilet, moans in their ears and the blast of colossal steamwhistles,

who barreled down the highways of the past journeying to the each other's hotrod-Golgotha jail-solitude watch or Birmingham jazz incarnation,

who drove crosscountry seventy-two hours to find out if I had a vision or you had a vision or he had a vision to find out Eternity,

who journeyed to Denver, who died in Denver, who came back to Denver & waited in vain, who watched over Denver & brooded & loned in Denver and finally went away to find out the Time, & now Denver is lonesome for her heroes,

who fell on their knees in hopeless cathedrals praying for each other's salvation and light and breasts, until the soul illuminated its hair for a second,

who crashed through their minds in jail waiting for impossible criminals with golden heads and the charm of reality in their hearts who sang sweet blues to Alcatraz,

who retired to Mexico to cultivate a habit, or Rocky Mount to tender Buddha or Tangiers to boys or Southern Pacific to the black locomotive or Harvard to Narcissus to Woodlawn to the daisychain or grave,

who demanded sanity trials accusing the radio of hypnotism & were left with their insanity & their hands & a hung jury,

who threw potato salad at CCNY lecturers on Dadaism and subsequently presented themselves on the granite steps of the madhouse with shaven heads and harlequin speech of suicide, demanding instantaneous lobotomy,

and who were given instead the concrete void of insulin Metrazol electricity hydrotherapy psychotherapy occupational therapy pingpong & amnesia,

who in humorless protest overturned only one symbolic pingpong table, resting briefly in catatonia,

returning years later truly bald except for a wig of blood, and tears and fingers, to the visible madman doom of the wards of the madtowns of the East,

Pilgrim State's Rockland's and Greystone's foetid halls, bickering with the echoes of the soul, rocking and rolling in the midnight solitude-bench dolmen-realms of love, dream of life a nightmare, bodies turned to stone as heavy as the moon,

with mother finally fucked, and the last fantastic book flung out of the tenement window, and the last door closed at 4 a.m. and the last telephone slammed at the wall in reply and the last furnished room emptied down to the last piece of mental furniture, a yellow paper rose twisted on a wire hanger in the closet, and even that imaginary, nothing but a hopeful little bit of hallucination --

ah, Carl, while you are not safe I am not safe, and now you're really in the total animal soup of time --

and who therefore ran through the icy streets obsessed with a sudden flash of the alchemy of the use of the ellipse the catalog the meter & the vibrating plane,

who dreamt and made incarnate gaps in Time & Space through images juxtaposed, and trapped the archangel of the soul between 2 visual images and joined the elemental verbs and set the noun and dash of consciousness together jumping with sensation of Pater Omnipotens Aeterna Deus

to recreate the syntax and measure of poor human prose and stand before you speechless and intelligent and shaking with shame, rejected yet confessing out the soul to conform to the rhythm of thought in his naked and endless head,

the madman bum and angel beat in Time, unknown, yet putting down here what might be left to say in time come after death,

and rose reincarnate in the ghostly clothes of jazz in the goldhorn shadow of the band and blew the suffering of America's naked mind for love into an eli eli lamma lamma sabacthani saxophone cry that shivered the cities down to the last radio

with the absolute heart of the poem of life butchered out of their own bodies good to eat a thousand years.

Monday, 25 February 2013

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 (3½ Stars)

This is Harry Potter's seventh year of school. This would be the upper sixth form, the last year of school for him, except that he's dropped out of school. He's gone underground after the events of the last film. Now he's on a mission to find parts of the Dark Lord's souls hidden in mystical objects called "horcruxes". From the previous film I understood that there were seven horcruxes, but now Harry only speaks about five. Maybe I missed a detail somewhere.

The film moves very slowly. I can't help feeling it would have been better to make one film out of the seventh Harry Potter book instead of two. Why was it split into two films? Was it for artistic or commercial reasons? I suspect the latter, but I haven't read a reliable answer anywhere.

Thursday, 21 February 2013

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (3½ Stars)

Though visibly the most appealing film so far, very little seems to happen. Rather than being packed with action like all the previous films it moves slowly. And what happened with the blossoming romance with Cho that we saw developing in the last two films? I have a feeling that the film has omitted something that the book explains.

I was also disappointed to see Severus Snape take the side of the Dark Lord. Until now he was my favorite teacher at Hogwart's. I liked to see him as being strict and unfriendly, but on the side of good. Just like a normal teacher! In contrast, I found Dumbledore's familiarity with Harry Potter alienating.

Getting back to the maturing of the characters, just look at Tom Felton in the poster above. He's no longer a child, he has the facial features of a man.

Tuesday, 19 February 2013

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (4½ Stars)

A storm is coming.

Harry Potter is coming of age. I don't just mean the character, I mean the film series as well. I'm glad that the swearing has been toned down since the last film. It's restricted to one exclamation from Ron's lips.

Harry is now 15 and in the 5th form (commonly called Year 10 to align it with the school systems in other European countries). He has his first kiss with Cho. Ah, that brings back memories. I had my first kiss when I was in the 5th form as well, though I was already 16 at the time. It was a clumsy kiss with Mandy Stickland, a friend of my sister's, outside her house in Aldridge after I walked her home. It was nowhere near as romantic as Harry's first kiss. My second kiss, a few days later, was better. Not as hurried, and more passionate. And yet it's the first kiss that I'll always remember. In fact, even though my relationship with Mandy lasted three months it's that one kiss that I remember more clearly than anything else.

Non-Americans probably don't realise that Dolores Umbridge is based on Mary Whitehouse, the bigoted anti-immorality and anti-progress campaigner of the 1970's and 1980's. History will remember her as a person who did evil in the name of good. If she were alive today she would be campaigning to ban the Internet because of its adverse effect on morals. When I was young she scared me; I thought that she would harm the society I was growing up in. Fortunately my fears were unfounded. She faded into obscurity after an injury in 1988 and died in 2001, having failed to bring about changes in any of the issues that meant so much to her.

This is the darkest of the Harry Potter films so far, and contains hints for the following stories. I'm glad that I'm watching them at last. But I'm still not tempted to read the books.