The third film in the Spider-Man trilogy is strongly criticised by film
critics and fans alike. Many call it awful. I don't understand it. I find it
very good, even if it's not up to the quality of the first two films. I
included it in
my list of my top 100 films
in 93rd place. In retrospect I think it should have been higher in the list.
"Spider-Man 3" has so much in its favour. It neatly brings the Harry Osborn
storyline to a close. The Sandman is brought to the big screen as a villain we
can sympathise with. The pathos of Peter Parker's on-off relationship with
Mary Jane Watson tugs at our heartstrings. My only criticism of the film is
that it's too short to do Venom justice. It should have lasted three hours to
give bigger battles with Venom.
I'm glad I had enough time to watch the whole trilogy without interruption
over the last three days. I haven't written much about the films. Do I need
to? I'm not a professional writer. I'm not paid to write 2000 words a day. If
I have something on my mind I'll write it, and if I don't I shan't force
myself.
The singer Prince was notorious for his sexual activities. At every party
he visited he picked up another woman. His songs were also very sexual.
In an interview he was asked what he liked doing most: having sex or writing
songs about sex. His initial reaction was to laugh and call it a silly question.
Then he became pensive and said that he didn't know the answer. Both were
important to him. In the same way, I can be asked whether I prefer watching
films or writing about films. I prefer watching films, but after eleven years
of writing my blog I find that writing about films is also very important
to me. Sometimes I write a big post, and the writing takes up more time than
I spent watching the film. I enjoy watching films. I enjoy writing about films.
I can't separate the two.
Success Rate: + 1.5
Order from Amazon.com | |
Order from Amazon.co.uk | |
Order from Amazon.de |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Tick the box "Notify me" to receive notification of replies.